Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting
Mailing Lists: lists.debian.org > debian-user-digest > 07 > 100791.html (Request Expert lists.debian.org Support)

debian-user-digest Digest V2007 #2706

From: <debian-user-digest-request(at)lists.debian.org>
Date: Tue Oct 30 2007 - 12:25:27 EDT


Content-Type: text/plain

debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2007 : Issue 2706

Today's Topics: 

  Re: Problems with installing Debian   [ "Orestes Leal"  ]
  suexec policy violation: see suexec   [ schemelab  ]
  Re: getting sound to stick in Etch..  [ Florian Kulzer  ]
  Re: iptables and virtual hosts probl  [ Andrew Sackville-West 

Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:58:53 -0500 (CST)
From: "Orestes Leal" <orestesleal13022@cha.jovenclub.cu>
To: "Triskal" <stefan.ploch@gmx.de>


Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org


Subject: Re: Problems with installing Debian Linux on a SATA hard disc

Message-ID: <62859.192.168.250.8.1193720333.squirrel@correo.ciudad.jovenclub.cu>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


With ETCH Everything will be OK!!



Greetings from Cuba.


olr


=3D=3D=3D




El Lun, 29 de Octubre de 2007, 12:30 pm, Triskal escribi=C3=B3:

> Hi there!
>
> I did a search for my problem, but couldn't find the answer. If I
> overlooked it, I apologize. Also, I'm quite new to Linux (I've used it
> for LaTeX, but not much else, and I'm an absolute novice at installing
> Linux.)
>
> About my system:
>
> 1. I have a Dell Dimension 5150 with a 320 GB SATA hard disc; on this
> disk, there is Windows XP (three partitions on the hard disc).
>
> 2. I bought a new internal hard disc (Samsung SATA2 160 GB
> (HD160/1HJ)) to install Debian Linux on it (Sarge 3.1r0a, which came
> on two DVDs which were part of one of the two main books in German on
> Debian Linux).
>
> The problem:
>
> The installation program didn't recognize either of my two hard discs
> (neither the one with Windows on it nor the new one): "no partitions
> found".
>
> Now, I'm currently downloading DVD iso images with Etch on it in the
> hope that Etch can handle SATA hard discs (since Sarge could not). Is
> there any point in doing this (i.e., does Etch still have the same
> problems with SATA discs)? Or what should I do?
>
> Please note that I'm still quite new to Linux. I have used it in the
> past to compile LaTeX documents, but that's about it. And I have only
> little experience with installing Linux.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Do you need help?X

love, peace and fuck the police ;-)



Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:58:38 -0700


From: "Todd A. Jacobs" <nospam@codegnome.org>
To: Debian User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: ssh into chroot

Message-ID: <20071030085838.GA29548@penguin.codegnome.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline


I'm using schroot to run a sid chroot inside of etch, and have run into
a problem. I googled around, and found the following:



  1.   use bind to mount /proc inside the chroot
  
  2.   run sshd inside the chroot
  
  3.   connect




Only when I do these things, ssh seems to hang during the login process:


    debug1: Authentication succeeded (password).
    debug1: channel 0: new [client-session]
    debug1: Entering interactive session.
    debug1: Sending environment.
    debug1: Sending env LANG = en_US.UTF-8


Obviously, it doesn't like the chroot somehow. What am I missing?


-- 
"Oh, look: rocks!"
	-- Doctor Who, "Destiny of the Daleks"


Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:44:11 -0700
From: Rippit the Ogg Frog <rippit@oggfrog.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Help with init script?
Message-ID: <4726EEDB.2030705@oggfrog.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'm trying to control a BitTorrent seed from an init script.  The 
original init script (that I wrote) is in /etc/init.d/btseed.  It starts 
and stops a script that is in /usr/local/bin/btseed.  This script just 
starts btlaunchmany, which is used to seed multiple .torrents.

I couldn't get Debian Etch's btlaunchmany to work, so I installed the 
.deb for the current upstream BitTorrent that's found at 
http://download.bittorrent.com/dl/  When I run that version's 
btlaunchmany manually, it works fine.

My problem is that btlaunchmany forks a couple child processes.  When I 
try to stop my daemon, my script itself exits but the child processes 
don't.  I think I could fix this by putting a signal handler in my 
script that will kill the child processes, but I don't know how to do 
that.  I'm also not sure of what would be the best way to identify the 
child process' process ID numbers.  Perhaps ps | grep would do.

My btseed script takes no command line parameters.  Here is the code to 
start the daemon from /etc/init.d/btseed:

d_start() {
         echo -n "$NAME"
         start-stop-daemon --start --background --quiet \
         --make-pidfile --pidfile "$PIDFILE" \
         --chuid nobody \
         --exec $DAEMON -- $DAEMONOPTS
}

Here is the code to stop it:

d_stop() {
start-stop-daemon --stop --oknodo --quiet --pidfile "$PIDFILE"
}

I have experimented with giving --signal to start-stop-daemon to try 
giving different signals to btseed, but nothing seemed to help.

Here is the btseed script:

#!/bin/sh

/usr/bin/btlaunchmany.py --max_upload_rate 128 \
  --save_in /var/bittorrent/torrentfiles \
  --torrent_dir /var/bittorrent/active \
  --minport 50000 \
  --maxport 51000 \
  --data_dir /var/bittorrent/data | /bin/bzip2 > 
/var/bittorrent/logs/bt.log.bz2

The reason I didn't just run btlaunchmany.py directly from the init 
script is that I need to pipe its output through bzip2 and redirect it 
to a file.  I wasn't clear on how I could do that from the 
start-stop-daemon command line.

Compressing the log is necessary because btlaunchmany.py's output is 
quite verbose, and will fill a filesystem quickly.

The nonstandard port numbers are an effort to work around ISPs who 
filter BitTorrent traffic.  This doesn't always work, but probably does 
in some cases.  The BitTorrent protocol itself handles the nonstandard 
port numbers without any trouble.

Thanks for any help you can give me.

Rippit
-- 
Rippit the Ogg Frog
rippit@oggfrog.com
http://www.oggfrog.com/

   Software isn't the only thing that should be free.
         Music should be too, as it once was.



Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:18:02 +0100
From: "Mathieu Malaterre" <mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed
Message-ID: <bf0c3b3f0710300218k3bb7352s7cb7147c73528463@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 10/29/07, Florian Kulzer <florian.kulzer+debian@icfo.es> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 15:24:00 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean:
> >
> > tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed
> >
> > Command:
> >
> > $ sudo apt-get  install  docbook-utils jadetex tetex-bin tetex-extra tetex-base
> >
> > on debian oldstable (sarge)
>
> It seems that you are trying to install Etch's version of tetex-base
> together with Sarge's version of jadetex. Please post the output of
>
> apt-cache policy jadetex tetex-base


Hi Florian,

  Here it is:

jadetex:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 3.13-6
  Version table:
     3.13-9 0
        -10 http://ftp.debian.org testing/main Packages
     3.13-6 0
        500 http://debian.theralys.com sarge/main Packages
tetex-base:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 3.0.dfsg.3-5~bpo.1
  Version table:
     2007-12 0
        -10 http://ftp.debian.org testing/main Packages
     3.0.dfsg.3-5~bpo.1 0
        900 http://debian.theralys.com sarge-backports/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2.0.2c-8 0
        500 http://debian.theralys.com sarge/main Packages


Thanks,
-- 
Mathieu


Do you need more help?X

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:24:32 +1100
From: Owen Townend <bowbowbow@optushome.com.au>
To: "Todd A. Jacobs" <nospam@codegnome.org>
Cc: Debian User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: ssh into chroot
Message-Id: <1193736272.6501.25.camel@mattimeo.aehgts.homeip.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hey,
  I've had a similar problem in BSD jails, sshd on the host system
defaulted to listen to all interfaces and hence began listening on the
virtual device assigned to the jail (or in this case chroot?). This was
fixed in a single line in the sshd config file. Perhaps a similar
problem is occurring here.

cheers,
Owen.

On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 01:58 -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:

> I'm using schroot to run a sid chroot inside of etch, and have run into
> a problem. I googled around, and found the following:
> 
>     1. use bind to mount /proc inside the chroot
>     2. run sshd inside the chroot
>     3. connect
> 
> Only when I do these things, ssh seems to hang during the login process:
> 
>     debug1: Authentication succeeded (password).
>     debug1: channel 0: new [client-session]
>     debug1: Entering interactive session.
>     debug1: Sending environment.
>     debug1: Sending env LANG = en_US.UTF-8
> 
> Obviously, it doesn't like the chroot somehow. What am I missing?
> 
> -- 
> "Oh, look: rocks!"
> 	-- Doctor Who, "Destiny of the Daleks"
> 
> 

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:50:37 +0100
From: Dal <mldal@linuxsystem.cz>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: Debian Users <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
Message-ID: <47270C7D.6050101@linuxsystem.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Daniel Burrows wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:14:18AM -0600, Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com> was heard to say:
>   
>> On Oct 28, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>>     
>>>  I'd say the main difference is that apt-get is a command-line tool,
>>> whereas aptitude is an interactive tool that can be driven from the
>>> command-line.
>>>       
>> I would disagree.  Aptitude supports command-line operation as well as 
>> interactive.
>>     
>
>   What I meant by that is that the project's goals and focus have always
> been on interactivity.  This isn't a matter of excluding particular
> lines of development, but most of the work that goes into aptitude is
> weighted towards its interactive features.  That's one reason, for
> instance, that the "show" output from the command-line is prettier
> than in apt-get, but slower and less useful to scripts.  These
> deficiencies could be corrected, but they are lower-priority than, say,
> improving interactive dependency handling and fixing UI glitches.
>
>   Also, I was trying to gently point out that there's more to aptitude
> than the command-line.  Excluding generic shared code, the rest of
> aptitude is about 6 times larger than the command-line interface, and it
> would be nice to think people occasionally use all that stuff. :-)  I
> occasionally notice people writing that they just discovered aptitude's
> curses interface after using it for ages, so I know that this isn't
> universally known.
>
>   Daniel
>
>
>   

Aptitude user interface is really great. When I started with debian 
there was just dselect and I don't think that was user friendly.
Just aptitude and synaptic too make debian easier for normal users. 
Anyway it's pity that aptitude doesn't (maybe I just can't find it) 
source download. Something like apt-get source package.

Anyway it has really better problems-with-packages solving :)



Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:32:01 -0000
From: schemelab <schemelab.webmin@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: suexec policy violation: see suexec log for more details
Message-ID: <1193751121.097425.115840@z9g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I am running Debian/Etch 4.0 and I don't understand how to get rid of
this error.

Further, "locate" shows no suexec logfile:

root@lhost:/var/log# locate suexec
/etc/apache2/mods-available/suexec.load
/etc/apache2/mods-available/suexec.load.lock
/etc/apache2/mods-enabled/suexec.load
/usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_suexec.so
/usr/lib/apache2/suexec
/usr/share/man/man8/suexec2.8.gz
/usr/share/webmin/apache/mod_suexec.pl

The problem occurs when I make a request to a CGI script:
[Tue Oct 30 08:26:26 2007] [error] [client 75.187.102.204] suexec
policy violation: see suexec log for more details
[Tue Oct 30 08:26:26 2007] [error] [client 75.187.102.204] Premature
end of script headers: hgwebdir.cgi



Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:14:00 +0200
From: Bogdan Marian <mendingo84@gmail.com>
To: MRH <misiek_spam@o2.pl>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: intall nvidia driver on debian lenny
Message-ID: <47288DA8.7000507@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

MRH wrote:

> Dnia 29/10/07 20:50,Nick Lidakis napisa=C5=82:
>> Bogdan Marian wrote:
>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Yes, it was running with the free version of the driver. I can=20
>>> successfully start if i change the Driver section to "nv" from=20
>>> "nvidia". In fact, that's how i'm able to send you this mail.
>>>
>>
>> I had a similar problem once; realized I forgot to do "apt-get=20
>> install nvidia-glx" which creates some necessary TLS links.
>
> This page should be helpful, it describes the whole process quite well=20
> (with different ways of installing the driver) and offers some=20
> troubleshooting:
> http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers
>
> Kind regards,
> Michal R. Hoffmann
>
>

Hello,

Nick, I'm running Lenny, so nvidia-glx is not in the repos...
Michal, I tried the methods on that page and it didn't work... Last=20
thing i tried was to install the NVIDIA way, using the Nvidia .bin=20
supplied from their home site...still no luck.

Bogdan



Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:04:31 +0530
From: "Siju George" <sgeorge.ml@gmail.com>
To: "Debian User" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: etch apt - Failed to fetch kernel, Size Mismatch error
Message-ID: <b713df2c0710300734n40675cd1o278a1a79e5816e2f@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi I am unable to upgrade my Debian Etch System to the new kernel.
Could some one please help me with this?

Details below

======================================================
fsdc:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ etch main contrib
deb http://security.debian.org etch/updates main contrib
#for sun java
#deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable non-free
fsdc:~# apt-get update
Get:1 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg [189B]
Get:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org etch Release.gpg [378B]
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org etch Release
Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org etch/main Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org etch/contrib Packages/DiffIndex
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org etch/main Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Packages
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org etch/contrib Packages
Fetched 2B in 2s (1B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
fsdc:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  dhcp-client librpcsecgss3 linux-image-2.6.18-5-486 linux-image-2.6.18-5-686
4 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 32.5MB/32.6MB of archives.
After unpacking 24.6kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
Get:1 http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main
linux-image-2.6.18-5-486 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch4 [16.2MB]
Get:2 http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main
linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch4 [16.3MB]
Fetched 652B in 1s (398B/s)
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.18-5-486_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch4_i386.deb
 Size mismatch
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.18-5-686_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch4_i386.deb
 Size mismatch
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with
--fix-missing?
fsdc:~# apt-get update --fix-missing
Get:1 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg [189B]
Get:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org etch Release.gpg [378B]
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org etch Release
Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org etch/main Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org etch/contrib Packages/DiffIndex
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org etch/main Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Packages
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org etch/contrib Packages
Fetched 2B in 2s (1B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
fsdc:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  dhcp-client librpcsecgss3 linux-image-2.6.18-5-486 linux-image-2.6.18-5-686
4 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 32.5MB/32.6MB of archives.
After unpacking 24.6kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
Get:1 http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main
linux-image-2.6.18-5-486 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch4 [16.2MB]
Get:2 http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main
linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch4 [16.3MB]
Fetched 652B in 1s (465B/s)
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.18-5-486_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch4_i386.deb
 Size mismatch
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.18-5-686_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch4_i386.deb
 Size mismatch
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with
--fix-missing?
fsdc:~# uname -a
Linux fsdc 2.6.18-5-486 #1 Thu Aug 30 01:46:45 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux
fsdc:~#
=====================================================
Thank you so much :-)

Kind Regards
Siju



Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:28:27 +0000
From: Digby Tarvin <digbyt@acm.org>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: getting sound to stick in Etch...
Message-ID: <20071030142827.GG24042@skaro.cthulhu.dircon.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

I am having a problem getting audio functionality to stick in a 
newly installed Etch system on a Dell precision 410 MT.

There was no sound device immediately after install, so I ran
alsaconf, selected:
	legacy Probe legacy ISA (non-PnP) chips
told it to probe "cs4236   Cirrus Logic CS4235-9" then answered Y to
	Do you want to modify /etc/modprobe.d/sound
And I get
	 OK, sound driver is configured.
 	 ALSA CONFIGURATOR  will prepare the card for playing now.
	 Now I will load the ALSA sound driver and use
	 amixer to raise the default volumes.

This results in /etc/modprobe.d/sound containing:
 alias snd-card-0 snd-cs4236
 options snd-cs4236 index=0 port=0x530 cport=0x538 isapnp=0 dma1=1 dma2=0 irq=5

and /proc/asound contains:
 dr-xr-xr-x 4 root root 0 2007-10-30 15:23 card0
 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-10-30 15:23 cards
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5 2007-10-30 15:23 CS4237B -> card0
 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-10-30 15:23 devices
 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-10-30 15:23 hwdep
 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-10-30 15:23 modules
 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2007-10-30 15:23 oss
 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-10-30 15:23 pcm
 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2007-10-30 15:23 seq
 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-10-30 15:23 timers
 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2007-10-30 15:23 version

Two problems...
1. after rebooting it is all gone and I have no sound again :(
   I assume the modprobe.d/sound file should be causing sound to be configured
   at boot time, but it appears not to be..
   Any ideas what is going wrong or what I still need to do?

2. No /dev/dsp, so attempting to run esd for gnome fails...
   Could it be anything to do with the /etc/modprobe.d entry:
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    41 2007-10-27 21:42 linux-sound-base_noOSS -> /lib/linux-sound-base/noOSS.modprobe.conf

Thanks,
DigbyT
-- 
Digby R. S. Tarvin                                          digbyt(at)digbyt.com
http://www.digbyt.com

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:59:25 +0100
From: Florian Kulzer <florian.kulzer+debian@icfo.es>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: getting sound to stick in Etch...
Message-ID: <20071030145925.GA11712@pc0197>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 14:28:27 +0000, Digby Tarvin wrote:

> I am having a problem getting audio functionality to stick in a 
> newly installed Etch system on a Dell precision 410 MT.
> 
> There was no sound device immediately after install, so I ran
> alsaconf, selected:
> 	legacy Probe legacy ISA (non-PnP) chips
> told it to probe "cs4236   Cirrus Logic CS4235-9" then answered Y to
> 	Do you want to modify /etc/modprobe.d/sound
> And I get
> 	 OK, sound driver is configured.
>  	 ALSA CONFIGURATOR  will prepare the card for playing now.
> 	 Now I will load the ALSA sound driver and use
> 	 amixer to raise the default volumes.
> 
> This results in /etc/modprobe.d/sound containing:
>  alias snd-card-0 snd-cs4236
>  options snd-cs4236 index=0 port=0x530 cport=0x538 isapnp=0 dma1=1 dma2=0 irq=5


[...]


> Two problems...
> 1. after rebooting it is all gone and I have no sound again :(
>    I assume the modprobe.d/sound file should be causing sound to be configured
>    at boot time, but it appears not to be..
>    Any ideas what is going wrong or what I still need to do?
>
> 2. No /dev/dsp, so attempting to run esd for gnome fails...
>    Could it be anything to do with the /etc/modprobe.d entry:
>    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    41 2007-10-27 21:42 linux-sound-base_noOSS -> /lib/linux-sound-base/noOSS.modprobe.conf


Adding the following two lines to /etc/modules might help:

snd_cs4236
snd_pcm_oss

-- 
Regards,            | http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer
          Florian   |



Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:20:48 -0600
From: Paul E Condon <pecondon@mesanetworks.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: /etc/host.conf questions
Message-ID: <20071030152048.GA3954@big.lan.gnu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

I'm running Etch. I'm involved in a project to understand
how networking is set up on my home lan. I'm looking at
/etc/host.conf . It contains a single line:

multi on

man host.conf says that a possible config-line in host.conf
is 'order', and there is no such line in my copy. This line
is supposed to determine whether BIND or /etc/hosts if 
searched first. Since there is no such line, resolver must
be doing some default. What is the default order in Debian
Etch? Or, is there some other place where the order is really
set in Debian Etch?

-- 
Paul E Condon           
pecondon@mesanetworks.net


Can we help you?X

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:43:59 -0400
From: "Mike Kuhar" <mikewk147@oh.rr.com>
To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: RE: /etc/host.conf questions
Message-ID: <003301c81b0b$b092f3b0$11b8db10$@rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-us

That would be
/etc/nsswitch.conf

on the line marked 'hosts'

-mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul E Condon [mailto:pecondon@mesanetworks.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:21 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: /etc/host.conf questions

I'm running Etch. I'm involved in a project to understand
how networking is set up on my home lan. I'm looking at
/etc/host.conf . It contains a single line:

multi on

man host.conf says that a possible config-line in host.conf
is 'order', and there is no such line in my copy. This line
is supposed to determine whether BIND or /etc/hosts if 
searched first. Since there is no such line, resolver must
be doing some default. What is the default order in Debian
Etch? Or, is there some other place where the order is really
set in Debian Etch?

-- 
Paul E Condon           
pecondon@mesanetworks.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org



Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:16:35 -0700
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: iptables and virtual hosts problem
Message-ID: <20071030161635.GZ1761@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IchZQccUbQrk8obU"
Content-Disposition: inline

--IchZQccUbQrk8obU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:09:50PM +0100, Erik Persson wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I have a server which is running 2 different virtual hosts (vserver), let=

's=20

> call them S for the server, A and B for the virtual hosts A and B.
> S, A and B have different ip-addresses (say s.s.s.s, a.a.a.a and b.b.b.b).
>
> Since the server isn't really forwarding anything I haven't used the=20
> FORWARD chain for anything, and I use INPUT and OUTPUT to regulate the fl=

ow=20

> to the different servers, for example:
>
> iptables -P INPUT DROP
> iptables -P OUTPUT DROP
> iptables -P FORWARD DROP
> iptables -I INPUT -d a.a.a.a -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
> on the server
> seems to do what I want. In the example above letting A and only A answer=

=20

> requests on port 80.
>
> However, when I try to regulate the flow of traffic between the different=

=20

> "machines" (S, A, and B) strange things happen.
>
> For example:
> iptables -I OUTPUT -d a.a.a.a -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT
> doesn't only allow any of the "machines" to try to contact port 25 on A,=

=20

> but it *also allows A to answer* !!!


if by answer, you mean respond to the same request, then that is
appropriate, IIUC. The rules relate to *new* requests, not responses
to existing ones. That's why when you block port 80 inbound, you can
still recieve packets -- they match up to outbound requests your
browser has made.

I think that's right.

A

--IchZQccUbQrk8obU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHJ1jjaIeIEqwil4YRAsv+AKDjpJqE6gyYAXMvuE7+GSXpT9IauACgs990
7lDKCFXCZMd77hruG6ZpfY8=
=WzSj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--IchZQccUbQrk8obU--

End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #2706
**************************************************

Received on Tue Oct 30 12:25:36 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 02:55:37 EDT

Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library