Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting
Mailing Lists: lists.debian.org > debian-user-digest > 07 > 110810.html (Request Expert lists.debian.org Support)

debian-user-digest Digest V2007 #2727

From: <debian-user-digest-request(at)lists.debian.org>
Date: Fri Nov 02 2007 - 13:57:44 EDT


Content-Type: text/plain

debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2007 : Issue 2727

Today's Topics: 

  Re: libgtkhtml: need help with compi  [ Andrew Sackville-West  ]
  Re: resolv.conf question              [ Andrew Sackville-West  ]
  Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude               [ Ken Irving  ]
  Re: Installing a promise ata 66 pci   [ "Douglas A. Tutty"  ]
  Re: X11 header and library files?     [ Wayne Topa  ]
  Re: libgtkhtml: need help with compi  [ Andrew Sackville-West 

Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:09:30 -0700


From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org


Subject: Re: libgtkhtml: need help with compilation error
Message-ID: <20071102150930.GV29856@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;


        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uWPcrH1o85ekjD8l"
Content-Disposition: inline



--uWPcrH1o85ekjD8l

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 07:06:07AM -0700, Rehceb Rotkiv wrote:

>=20


> Hi all!


>=20

> I'm trying to compile GtkHTML 3.16.1 (which I need for compiling the newe=

st

> Evolution). The configure script runs through without errors. make, howev=

er,

> terminates with these errors:
>=20


> ...
> testgtkhtml.o: In function `print_preview_cb':
> /home/vibe/evo-sources/gtkhtml-3.16.1/src/testgtkhtml.c:354: undefined
> reference to `gtk_print_operation_new'
> /home/vibe/evo-sources/gtkhtml-3.16.1/src/testgtkhtml.c:355: undefined
> reference to `gtk_print_operation_set_n_pages'
> /home/vibe/evo-sources/gtkhtml-3.16.1/src/testgtkhtml.c:361: undefined
> reference to `gtk_print_operation_run'
> testgtkhtml.o: In function `draw_page_cb':
> /home/vibe/evo-sources/gtkhtml-3.16.1/src/testgtkhtml.c:324: undefined
> reference to `gtk_print_context_create_pango_layout'
> testgtkhtml.o: In function `print_footer':
> /home/vibe/evo-sources/gtkhtml-3.16.1/src/testgtkhtml.c:300: undefined
> reference to `gtk_print_context_get_cairo_context'
> ./.libs/libgtkhtml-3.14.so: undefined reference to
> `gtk_page_setup_get_page_width'
> ./.libs/libgtkhtml-3.14.so: undefined reference to `pango_units_to_double'
> ./.libs/libgtkhtml-3.14.so: undefined reference to
> `gtk_print_context_get_page_setup'
> ./.libs/libgtkhtml-3.14.so: undefined reference to
> `gtk_page_setup_get_page_height'
> ./.libs/libgtkhtml-3.14.so: undefined reference to
> `gtk_print_context_create_pango_context'
> ./.libs/libgtkhtml-3.14.so: undefined reference to
> `gtk_print_context_get_height'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> ...


>=20

> I have the necessary libraries installed  (from Debian's *-dev packages) =
--

> at least I think so! Do you have an idea what might be wrong?


definitely looks like you're missing a library there. or at least
missing an include for GtkPrintOperation. That's per google and I'm no
dev.

On my system, the function gtk_print_operation_new is provided by
/usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtkprintoperation.h, part of  libgtk2.0-dev.=20

I found this by a quick google on the undefined references above and a
little grepping in /usr/include. You can probably do this as well...

A


--uWPcrH1o85ekjD8l
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Do you need more help?X

Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHKz2paIeIEqwil4YRAhDZAKDhuKepLmjFJUkcqrWVcJyzKu8ACACggava
iDjEsTLoLaqDlcI90H5wleo=
=9m1e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--uWPcrH1o85ekjD8l--


Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 11:10:12 -0400
From: AJ Milne <ajmilne@well.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: A little Debian love
Message-Id: <20071102111012.d074ba0f.ajmilne@well.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

... Dunno if this is entirely appropriate for this list or not. Thing is, I'm one of those users who's never really into the mailing lists, as I've never really needed them...


Which, would, actually, be the subject of this message...

This is just to say to the Debian developers and package maintainers and so on: Debian has worked for me wonderfully for many, many years, now. So thank you, all of you. Very, very much. And a longer post with the same general message is at:

http://accidentalweblog.org/index.php?itemid=336

... thanks all.
-- 
AJ Milne
http://accidentalweblog.org/

Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:48:06 -0700
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: resolv.conf question
Message-ID: <20071102154806.GW29856@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YNEMMPJXay2VNSoy"
Content-Disposition: inline

--YNEMMPJXay2VNSoy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 05:20:56PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:

> I'm running Etch. My resolv.conf starts with the line:

>=20

> # generated by NetworkManager, do not edit!

>=20

> and contains entries that I want to have new different
> values. I want to change the values in a way that last
> through a reboot, and I'd like to do it by editting
> a file using vim. What is the file that is the=20
> authoritative source of nameserver addresses?


I found this:
http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManagerConfigurationSpecification

but couldn't tell from a quick read where those configs were supposed
to go. Most of the way down the page it referes to DNS settings.=20

I don't use NM, so I leave implementing it up to you ;)

A

--YNEMMPJXay2VNSoy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHK0a2aIeIEqwil4YRApWAAJ97Xo1WOj7bYvmAwi8KHS80aP5hvQCghJH4
LRZPXXWYr+Ozl4fO3Pta6fk=
=nkFC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--YNEMMPJXay2VNSoy--



Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 12:01:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: ISHWAR RATTAN <rattan@cps.cmich.edu>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: X11 header and library files?
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0711021159490.9267@cps155.cps.cmich.edu>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

What .deb package contains X11-header and libraries for
developmental work?

-ishwar



Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:51:28 +0530
From: Raj Kiran Grandhi <grajkiran@gmail.com>
To: ISHWAR RATTAN <rattan@cps.cmich.edu>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: X11 header and library files?
Message-ID: <472B4E88.7090408@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:

> What .deb package contains X11-header and libraries for
> developmental work?
> 
> -ishwar


apt-cache is your friend for this. Try,

apt-cache search <keywords>

man apt-cache  for more info


HTH
Raj Kiran



Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:50:21 -0600
From: John Schmidt <john.andrew.schmidt@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: chroot testing of apache installation with multiple fqdn
Message-Id: <200711021050.22119.john.andrew.schmidt@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

I am testing out the installation of some software that involves specifying 
hostname information for the install.  I have set up a minimal chroot 
environment and downloaded all of the debian packages and the other software 
that is needed to build it.  

I am using this on my laptop that is brought back and forth from home to work.  
While at work, I have a static routable address assigned to me via dhcp.  At 
home, the laptop sits on my private lan with a 192.168.1.*. statically 
assigned.   

One of the pieces of software I install is apache and a routeable 
address/hostname is required as part of the install procedure for apache and 
some of the other software.

If I do the install testing from home with my 192.168.1.* address in my chroot 
environment, things work fine.  However, if I am at work testing the install 
done at home, then the apache web server won't be able to start.  Likewise, 
installs done at work and then tested at home have issues when starting 
apache.

Is there a way to set up my chroot environment (or perhaps it is an apache 
issue) that allows me the freedom to move the machine from one network to 
another and just always go to the localhost instead of the actual machine 
name/routeable address while still allow apache to start up regardless of 
where the initial apache installation was done?

Thanks for any insight into this matter.

John Schmidt

 



Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:52:51 +0200
From: Bogdan Marian <mendingo84@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: Florian Kulzer <florian.kulzer+debian@icfo.es>
Subject: Re: intall nvidia driver on debian lenny
Message-ID: <472CA763.8020703@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------030201050605090804090804"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030201050605090804090804
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Florian Kulzer wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 20:31:09 +0200, Bogdan Marian wrote:
>   

>> Florian Kulzer wrote:
>>     
>>> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 19:21:00 +0200, Bogdan Marian wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Florian Kulzer wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>>>> Bogdan Marian wrote:
>>>>>>>               
>

> [...]

>

>   

>>>>>>> Nick, I'm running Lenny, so nvidia-glx is not in the repos...
>>>>>>> Michal, I tried the methods on that page and it didn't work... Last 
>>>>>>> thing i tried was to install the NVIDIA way, using the Nvidia .bin 
>>>>>>> supplied from their home site...still no luck.
>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> Which kernel do you run? (Post the output of "uname -a".)
>>>>>
>>>>> Which nvidia card are we talking about? (Post the relevant part of your
>>>>> "lspci" output.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Which version of the nvidia driver did you install? (We need the exact
>>>>> name of the file that you downloaded and executed.) Did you get any
>>>>> error messages or warnings when you attempted the installation?
>>>>>
>>>>> Change your xorg.conf to use the nvidia driver and (re)start X. After it
>>>>> fails/crashes, run the following two commands and post their output:
>>>>>
>>>>> egrep '^\((EE|WW)\)' /var/log/Xorg.0.log
>>>>>
>>>>> egrep -i 'nvidia|glx' /var/log/Xorg.0.log
>>>>>           
>

> [...]

>

>   

>> No error while installing ( except for a warning about the version of the 
>> gcc (it 4.2 as i'm on lenny) )
>>     
>

> I think it can cause problems if you use a different version of gcc to
> compile the nvidia module (as compared to what was used to compile the
> kernel).

>

>   

>> NVIDIA FX5200
>>
>> NVIDIA-Linux-x86-100.14.19-pkg1.run
>>
>> mydebian:/home/bogdan# lspci
>>     
>

> [...]

>

>   

>> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5200] (rev a1)
>>     
>

> [...]

>

>   

>> mydebian:/home/bogdan# uname -a
>> Linux mydebian 2.6.22-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Aug 31 00:24:01 UTC 2007 i686 
>> GNU/Linux
>>
>> (II) NVIDIA(0): Support for GLX with the Damage and Composite X extensions 
>> is
>> (II) NVIDIA(0):     enabled.
>> (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to load the NVIDIA kernel module!
>> (EE) NVIDIA(0):  *** Aborting ***
>> (II) UnloadModule: "nvidia"
>> (II) UnloadModule: "wfb"
>> (II) UnloadModule: "fb"
>> (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
>>
>> Fatal server error:
>> no screens found
>>     
>

> OK, it does load the Xorg driver for nvidia ("nvidia_drv.so" and/or
> "nvidia_drv.o" located in /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/) but then it
> cannot load the nvidia kernel module (nvidia.ko). 

>

> First, check if the kernel module exists at all:

>

> find /lib/modules/2.6.22-2-686/ -name nvidia.ko

>

> (I would expect that the file exists; the nvidia installer should have
>  given you a clear error if it had not been able to create the module.)

>

> If the file exists, try to load it by running as root:

>

> modprobe -v nvidia

>

> (I suspect your problem is caused by the gcc version mismatch and/or the
>  paravirt/GPL-only issue. I hope that the modprobe command will give you
>  an error message which tells us what exactly is going on.)

>

>   

Hello,

This is what is gives me....btw, sorry for the late answer..:

mydebian:/lib/modules/2.6.22-2-686# modprobe -v nvidia
install /sbin/lrm-video nvidia
sh: /sbin/lrm-video: No such file or directory
FATAL: Error running install command for nvidia

--------------030201050605090804090804
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Florian Kulzer wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid20071031192629.GA27915@pc0197" type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 20:31:09 +0200, Bogdan Marian wrote:
  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">Florian Kulzer wrote:
    </pre>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 19:21:00 +0200, Bogdan Marian wrote:
      </pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre wrap="">Florian Kulzer wrote:
        </pre>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <pre wrap="">Bogdan Marian wrote:
              </pre>
            </blockquote>
          </blockquote>
        </blockquote>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
[...]

  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <pre wrap="">Nick, I'm running Lenny, so nvidia-glx is not in the repos...
Michal, I tried the methods on that page and it didn't work... Last 
thing i tried was to install the NVIDIA way, using the Nvidia .bin 
supplied from their home site...still no luck.
                
              </pre>
            </blockquote>
          </blockquote>
          <pre wrap="">Which kernel do you run? (Post the output of "uname -a".)

Which nvidia card are we talking about? (Post the relevant part of your
"lspci" output.)

Which version of the nvidia driver did you install? (We need the exact
name of the file that you downloaded and executed.) Did you get any
error messages or warnings when you attempted the installation?

Change your xorg.conf to use the nvidia driver and (re)start X. After it
fails/crashes, run the following two commands and post their output:

egrep '^\((EE|WW)\)' /var/log/Xorg.0.log

egrep -i 'nvidia|glx' /var/log/Xorg.0.log
          </pre>
        </blockquote>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
[...]

  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">No error while installing ( except for a warning about the version of the 
gcc (it 4.2 as i'm on lenny) )
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
I think it can cause problems if you use a different version of gcc to
compile the nvidia module (as compared to what was used to compile the
kernel).

  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">NVIDIA FX5200

NVIDIA-Linux-x86-100.14.19-pkg1.run

mydebian:/home/bogdan# lspci
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
[...]

  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5200] (rev a1)
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
[...]

  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">mydebian:/home/bogdan# uname -a
Linux mydebian 2.6.22-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Aug 31 00:24:01 UTC 2007 i686 
GNU/Linux

(II) NVIDIA(0): Support for GLX with the Damage and Composite X extensions 
is
(II) NVIDIA(0):     enabled.
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to load the NVIDIA kernel module!
(EE) NVIDIA(0):  *** Aborting ***
(II) UnloadModule: "nvidia"
(II) UnloadModule: "wfb"
(II) UnloadModule: "fb"
(EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.

Fatal server error:
no screens found
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
OK, it does load the Xorg driver for nvidia ("nvidia_drv.so" and/or
"nvidia_drv.o" located in /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/) but then it
cannot load the nvidia kernel module (nvidia.ko). 

First, check if the kernel module exists at all:

find /lib/modules/2.6.22-2-686/ -name nvidia.ko

(I would expect that the file exists; the nvidia installer should have
 given you a clear error if it had not been able to create the module.)

If the file exists, try to load it by running as root:

modprobe -v nvidia

(I suspect your problem is caused by the gcc version mismatch and/or the
 paravirt/GPL-only issue. I hope that the modprobe command will give you
 an error message which tells us what exactly is going on.)

  </pre>
</blockquote>
Hello,<br>
<br>
This is what is gives me....btw, sorry for the late answer..:<br>
<br>
mydebian:/lib/modules/2.6.22-2-686# modprobe -v nvidia<br>
install /sbin/lrm-video nvidia<br>
sh: /sbin/lrm-video: No such file or directory<br>
FATAL: Error running install command for nvidia<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------030201050605090804090804--



Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:34:01 -0500
From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GLIBC_2.4
Message-ID: <87sl3oip3a.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I wrote:

> See my other reponse to this thread.  ~/bin at the front of $PATH is a
> security risk.


Miles writes:

> It an attacker is able to install stuff in ~/bin, they can (and almost
> certainly would) also modify your .profile (etc) to change PATH
> themselves.


There are a number of such exposures for the naive users that are now
starting to put Linux on their computers.  They will be exploited when the
number of vulnerable machines gets large enough.
-- 
John Hasler



Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:58:39 -0800
From: Ken Irving <fnkci@uaf.edu>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
Message-ID: <20071102165838.GA29756@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 07:25:58AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 11:09:07AM -0800, Ken Irving <fnkci@uaf.edu> was heard to say:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 08:19:58PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > >   No, I just come down hard on this meme because it seems to have taken
> > > on a life of its own and I'd like to squash it before it grows up into a
> > > full-blown urban legend.
> > 
> > That sounds good, but is it different now than it used to be?  I haven't
> > tried it lately, but it used to "seem" to want to remove lots of things.
> > I'm aware of the workarounds (keep-all or whatever), have followed most
> > of the threads (even instigated some...), but am still a command-line
> > apt-get user waiting for a reason to change.  Two problems I have with
> > aptitude are the lack of "source" functionality and my inability to spell
> > it as easily as apt-get. ;-)
> 
>   There were bugs in some past versions.  As far as I know, the worst
> ones (e.g., #411123) were fixed in etch.  There were some new bugs
> introduced in unstable with the switchover to using apt to track unused
> packages (where aptitude would even want to remove packages it had just
> installed), but those should be fixed in 0.4.7.
> 
>   There are a few corner cases in which aptitude will do the wrong
> thing.
> 
>   * Marking a package for removal in aptitude, exiting, removing it with
>     apt-get, installing it again with apt-get, then running aptitude.
>     aptitude will still remember that you want to remove the package.
> 
>   * If you interrupt aptitude before it writes its state database, it
>     will sometimes get confused about the system state, especially if
>     you proceed to run apt-get before aptitude. (I can't remember the
>     precise sequence of events that have to happen to trigger this off
>     the top of my head)
> 
>   Those are the only ways I can think of offhand to get aptitude to
> remove packages you didn't ask it to.  Unfortunately, there's no
> reliable way to tell if someone else has fiddled with a package
> (#429438), so as long as aptitude tries to save and restore the current
> state, there will be a few edge cases like this.
> 
>   Anything I didn't list above is a bug that I don't know about.
> 
>   Daniel


Thank you!  I just did an aptitude upgrade, and that old remove-everything
problem is indeed gone, and no obscure workarounds needed.

FWIW, a "newubie doc" referenced earlier in this thread,

  http://newbiedoc.berlios.de/wiki/Aptitude_-_using_together_with_Synaptic_and_Apt-get

perpetuates this particular meme, linking back to an old thread based
apparently on that bug.

Ken
-- 
Ken Irving, fnkci+debianuser@uaf.edu


Can we help you?X

Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 12:04:46 -0400
From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Installing a promise ata 66 pci ide card
Message-ID: <20071102160446.GA7256@titan.hooton>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 11:06:32PM -0700, Sam wrote:

> 
> I have reached a storage conundrum, i have a dual p3 server 1gbit ram
> running off a 9 gig scsi as well as 4 ide hdd's totalling 1.5Terabytes. The
> problem is: I cannot afford scsi drives and i have used up all 4 ide slots.
> I am trying to plan for expansion, I happen to have a promise ultra ata 66
> pci card with two ide slots. My question being what is necessary to install
> this promise card? I tried googling but there was nothing but "debian not
> recognizing hard disks, using promise card" etc, nothing about installing
> the card on a boxen that already has debian on it.
> 
> As a side note, if anyone has any other suggestions for expansion, feel free
> to field them, as I am not set in my ways ;)


Why not install a SATA card (PATA cables block too much air flow, among
other problems), and you don't get into the master/slave controller
contention issues with SATA.  This gives you lots of expansion options.  

I don't know about brands of cards.  My MB has 7 SATA ports.

Check out addonics.com.  Their products that work with linux are listed
as working with linux.  

Doug.



Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rehceb Rotkiv <scame@fastmail.fm>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: libgtkhtml: need help with compilation error
Message-ID: <13551551.post@talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Andrew Sackville-West wrote:

> 
> definitely looks like you're missing a library there. or at least
> missing an include for GtkPrintOperation. That's per google and I'm no
> dev.
> 
> On my system, the function gtk_print_operation_new is provided by
> /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtkprintoperation.h, part of  libgtk2.0-dev. 
> 
> I found this by a quick google on the undefined references above and a
> little grepping in /usr/include. You can probably do this as well...
> 
> A
> 


Hi Andrew,

thanks for your help. My GTK (libgtk2.0-dev from the Etch repos) does not
have /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtkprintoperation.h! I compiled it from source and
now have this file in /usr/local/include/gtk-2.0/. How do I tell configure
and/or make to look for GTK at this location? I already tried

$ ./configure LD_LIBRARY_PATH='/usr/local/include' 

(without knowing what exactly I was doing), but it didn't work.

Regards,
Rehceb

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/libgtkhtml%3A-need-help-with-compilation-error-tf4737644.html#a13551551
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 13:08:53 -0400
From: Wayne Topa <linuxone@intergate.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: X11 header and library files?
Message-ID: <20071102170853.GA5080@buddy.mtntop.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

ISHWAR RATTAN(rattan@cps.cmich.edu) is reported to have said:

> What .deb package contains X11-header and libraries for
> developmental work?


??
Have you tried

apt-cache search X11 |grep lib |grep -- -dev
apt-cache search X11 |grep header

W

-- 
Southern DOS: Y'all reckon? (Yep/Nope)
_______________________________________________________



Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:48:38 -0700
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: libgtkhtml: need help with compilation error
Message-ID: <20071102174838.GA29856@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j4ivd53YxxNwCQqF"
Content-Disposition: inline

--j4ivd53YxxNwCQqF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:04:10AM -0700, Rehceb Rotkiv wrote:
>=20
>=20

> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >=20
> > definitely looks like you're missing a library there. or at least
> > missing an include for GtkPrintOperation. That's per google and I'm no
> > dev.
> >=20
> > On my system, the function gtk_print_operation_new is provided by
> > /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtkprintoperation.h, part of  libgtk2.0-dev.=20
> >=20
> > I found this by a quick google on the undefined references above and a
> > little grepping in /usr/include. You can probably do this as well...
> >=20

>=20

> thanks for your help. My GTK (libgtk2.0-dev from the Etch repos) does not
> have /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtkprintoperation.h! I compiled it from source =

and

> now have this file in /usr/local/include/gtk-2.0/. How do I tell configure
> and/or make to look for GTK at this location? I already tried

>=20

> $ ./configure LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D'/usr/local/include'=20

>=20

> (without knowing what exactly I was doing), but it didn't work.


sorry. out of my league. try ./configure --help as that doesn't look
like a valid ./configure option to my eye. Maybe,=20

export LD_LI... ; ./configure=20

but I'm just guessing.

A

--j4ivd53YxxNwCQqF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHK2L2aIeIEqwil4YRAlxWAKClMFy8eYKqxYWrQvF9s3FwDfjiSQCgmXo0
lvLZ5birgsrGIbH10a4DMcE=
=ILFB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--j4ivd53YxxNwCQqF--

End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #2727
**************************************************

Received on Fri Nov  2 14:00:36 2007
Do you need help?X

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 02:55:50 EDT

Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library