|
|||||||||||
|
debian-user-digest Digest V2007 #2742
From: <debian-user-digest-request(at)lists.debian.org>
Date: Sun Nov 04 2007 - 22:33:11 EST
debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2007 : Issue 2742 Today's Topics: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=E1=3A_home_netw [ Marty
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:10:37 -0500
Message-ID: <472E5F7D.5090201@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable P=E1l Cs=E1nyi wrote: >> > I set up on both box-2 & box-3 the dhcp client to get the >> > domain-name-servers, and have these servers in resolv.conf. >> >> Did you enable packet forwarding on box 1? >=20 > Yes I did. > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward > is 1 >=20 >> Is shorewall masquerading for you? >=20 > No, I have not a public IP address yet, so I don't need it.
Typically you will need either IP masquerading or NAT, along with all=20
appropriate modules/drivers (e.g. ethernet bridging.), to enable your loc=
al=20
If you haven't done so already, please see the excellent networking HOWTO=
's on=20
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 16:22:46 -0800
Message-Id: <8817d129edb60e56c04d73f0cd2080c2@prodigy.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Hello:
I obtained the software for it from the Konica Minolta
site today. It is Page Scope for Linux but the documentation
refers to Red Hat and Suse with 2.2.x kernels.
Does anyone have experience with this enough to tell
me if there might be compatibility issues, or special
considerations and issues particular to Debian.
I am running Debian etch on AMD64.
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:25:54 +1100
Message-ID: <95455e980711041625y67a148bl7afdd9a753f0ba8c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Thanks Owen. To run nfs server, should I install both nfs-common and nfs-user-server, or just nfs-common? Thank you. Jim On 11/5/07, Owen Townend <bowbowbow@optushome.com.au> wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 11:04 +1100, hce wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I got an error "E: Couldn't find package nfs" while trying to install > > nfs server by calling "apt-get install nfs". Is the nfs wrong nfs > > server package name? > > > > Thank you. > > > > Jim > > > > > Hey, > Try `apt-cache search nfs` > It should return the correct package names. > One of these is probably what you're after: >> nfs-kernel-server - support for NFS kernel server > nfs-user-server - User space NFS server > > > cheers, > Owen. > >
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:30:58 +1100
Message-ID: <95455e980711041630q26b67bfcp496edd2a5871554e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Thanks Andy and other responses. It is a good solution although I wish I could use the vim to read HTML with ability to click the URL links like lynx (asking too much :-)). Thank you. Jim
On 11/4/07, Andy Smith <andy@lug.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 07:31:53PM +1100, hce wrote: > > I've just installed mutt in Debian, one problem is there are some > > mails from news lists with HTTP format, it was fine when I use Mozilla > > mail reader, but with mutt and vim, I could not read the HTTP format > > mails. One solution I can think of is to use lynx, but I don't know > > how to config mutt with lynx. How do you handle this issue? > > If you mean HTML, there was a post to Planet Debian on this subject > just yesterday: > > http://cord.de/blog/index.php?entry=entry071103-141719 > > I do it that way too. > > Cheers, > Andy > > -- > http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting > Encrypted mail welcome - keyid 0x604DE5DB > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFHLYVsIJm2TL8VSQsRAuHUAJ9PRZp1QI28SS9epCTl90qoss7gHgCgi1ZC > I/aRLb3W5cVPXAqrhHMus3M= > =lE+W > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:36:17 +1100
Message-Id: <1194222978.6622.29.camel@mattimeo.aehgts.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 11:25 +1100, hce wrote:
Hey,
cheers,
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:43:55 +1100
Message-Id: <1194223436.6622.36.camel@mattimeo.aehgts.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 11:36 +1100, Owen Townend wrote:
summary: nfs-common alone = client nfs-kernel-server + nfs-common = kernel server nfs-user-server + (dependencies) = userspace server
cheers,
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:49:21 +1100
Message-ID: <95455e980711041649n7006c088xa75f7ca34737277f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 11/5/07, Owen Townend <bowbowbow@optushome.com.au> wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 11:25 +1100, hce wrote: > > Thanks Owen. To run nfs server, should I install both nfs-common and > > nfs-user-server, or just nfs-common? > > > > Thank you. > > > > Jim > > > > On 11/5/07, Owen Townend <bowbowbow@optushome.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 11:04 +1100, hce wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I got an error "E: Couldn't find package nfs" while trying to install > > > > nfs server by calling "apt-get install nfs". Is the nfs wrong nfs > > > > server package name? > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > Try `apt-cache search nfs` > > > It should return the correct package names. > > > One of these is probably what you're after: > > > > > > nfs-common - NFS support files common to client and server > > > nfs-kernel-server - support for NFS kernel server > > > nfs-user-server - User space NFS server > > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > Owen. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, > nfs-kernel-server depends on nfs-common but I don't believe the > userspace server does. Running `apt-get install nfs-user-server` will > tell you of the dependancies and resolve them if it can. You can also > use `apt-cache depend nfs-user-server` to find out. Thanks Owen, I installed nfs-user-server and added /etc/exports. But, could not find exportfs in /sbin or /usr/sbin, I thought the exportfs is included in nfs server packet, seems I got wrong. I did "apt-cache search exportfs", nothing happend? Thank you. Jim
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:37:19 +0530
Message-ID: <472E6CC7.3080504@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
jekillen wrote:
If it is a postscript printer and the manufacturer has provided you with the .ppd file, you should be able use that ppd file to print to the printer. You might want to install cupsys and go to http://localhost:631 for installing and configuring your printer > Does anyone have experience with this enough to tell -- Raj Kiran Grandhi
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:00:43 +1100
From: Owen Townend <bowbowbow@optushome.com.au>
To: hce <webmail.hce@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Could not find nfs package
Message-Id: <1194224443.6622.44.camel@mattimeo.aehgts.homeip.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 11:49 +1100, hce wrote:
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 20:22:30 -0500 From: Mark Grieveson <dg135@torfree.net> To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: bootsplash ramble Message-ID: <20071104202230.640d3ae1@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I tried setting up bootsplash, on my Etch box, and have failed miserably. I installed it, and messed around with the /boot/grub/menu.lst file, adding "vga=791 splash=silent" to the kernel line. It made the print smaller, but did not give me a nifty bootsplash. I then attempted to recompile my kernel, as instructed (a hell of a thing to have to do just to get a bootsplash, but, well, since I had started.....) Anyway, first using menuconfig, and then xconfig, I was unable to find any entry for "Console drivers". I did find some framebuffer stuff, but nothing about "Use splash screen instead of boot logo", as I was instructed to turn on. I did find something about turning on a penguin during bootup (the "boot logo", maybe?). I checked that, just so that I could say to myself, "Well, at least I did SOMETHING". Now, hours later, I'm still waiting for the revised kernel to finish its stuff, via the command fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-custom kernel_image kernel_headers. Yikes. Has anyone else succeeded with bootsplash? Mark Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 03:45:21 +0200 From: "Dotan Cohen" <dotancohen@gmail.com> To: "Manon Metten" <manon.metten@gmail.com> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Which browser is better, firefox? Message-ID: <880dece00711041745r1b87b27eo1b640d59f7a5f208@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline T24gMDQvMTEvMjAwNywgTWFub24gTWV0dGVuIDxtYW5vbi5tZXR0ZW5AZ21haWwuY29tPiB3cm90 ZToKPiBPbiAxMS80LzA3LCBCYXJ0bGVieVNjcml2ZW5lciA8YnNjcml2ZW5lcjQyQGdtYWlsLmNv bT4gd3JvdGU6Cj4KPgo+ID4gPiBUaGlzIG1lYW5zLCBJY2V3ZWFzZWwgKmlzKiBGaXJlZm94IGp1 c3Qgd2l0aCBhbm90aGVyIG5hbWUuCj4gPgo+ID4gWWVzLCB1c3VhbGx5LiBCdXQgaXQgYWxzbyB3 cmVha3MgaGF2b2Mgd2l0aCBjZXJ0YWluIHNpdGVzIGJlY2F1c2UgdGhlCj4gPiB1c2VyIGFnZW50 IHNheXMgImljZSB3ZWFzZWwiIHdoaWNoIG1vc3Qgc2l0ZXMgZG9uJ3QgcmVjb2duaXplLiBJZiB5 b3UKPiA+IHN0YXkgd2l0aCBpY2Ugd2Vhc2VsLCBJIHJlY29tbWVuZCB0aGUgZmlyZWZveCB1c2Vy IGFnZW50IHN3aXRjaGVyCj4gPiBwbHVnaW4gaWYgeW91IGhhdmUgYW55IHByb2JsZW1zIHdpdGgg c2NyaXB0cyBub3QgcnVubmluZyBldGMuCj4KPiBPciBpbiBhYm91dDpjb25maWcgc2V0ICJnZW5l cmFsIC51c2VyYWdlbnQuZXh0cmEuZmlyZWZveCIgdG8KPiAiRmlyZWZveC8yLjAuMC44Ii4KPgo+ IE1hbm9uLgo+CgpPciB3cml0ZSB0byB0aGUgd2Vic2l0ZXMgdGhhdCBkbyBVQSBzbmlmZmluZyBh bmQgc2VydmUgbXVuZ2xlZCBjb250ZW50CnRvIGVhY2ggYnJvd3Nlci4gVGVsbCB0aGVtIHRvIHdy aXRlIHN0YW5kYXJkLCB2YWxpZCBjb2RlLgoKRG90YW4gQ29oZW4KCmh0dHA6Ly93aGF0LWlzLXdo YXQuY29tCmh0dHA6Ly9naWJiZXJpc2guY28uaWwK15At15Et15It15Mt15Qt15Ut15Yt15ct15gt 15kt15ot15st15wt150t154t158t16At16Et16It16Mt16Qt16Ut16Yt16ct16gt16kt16oKCkE6 IEJlY2F1c2UgaXQgbWVzc2VzIHVwIHRoZSBvcmRlciBpbiB3aGljaCBwZW9wbGUgbm9ybWFsbHkg cmVhZCB0ZXh0LgpROiBXaHkgaXMgdG9wLXBvc3Rpbmcgc3VjaCBhIGJhZCB0aGluZz8K
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 07:11:45 +0530
From: Kumar Appaiah <akumar@iitm.ac.in>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bootsplash ramble
Message-ID: <20071105014145.GA5560@debian>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 08:22:30PM -0500, Mark Grieveson wrote:
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:01:24 +0900 From: babynewton <babynewton@pineone.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: debian 4.0 can't detect PCMCIA lan card Message-ID: <472E7974.5050800@pineone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi. I have one problem while installing debian 4.0 on tecra530cdt with PCMCIA lancard. I used floppy image to install because cd rom drive is not available. Installer detected PCMCIA card and completed installation on PCMCIA lancard. However, debian after rebooting can't detect PCMCIA. It's new in debian 4.0. debian 3.1 successfully detected PCMCIA after rebooting. Does anybody know how to detect it? thank you.
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 21:17:06 -0500
From: Wayne Topa <linuxone@intergate.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: how to read http mails in mutt mail reader (vim)?
Message-ID: <20071105021706.GA7655@buddy.mtntop.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
hce(webmail.hce@gmail.com) is reported to have said:
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:26:52 +0800
From: "hhding.gnu" <hhding.gnu@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian user list <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: hard disk device name change after reboot
Message-ID: <472E7F6C.6060707@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
It seems it works with some filesystem and do *NOT* work for swap
partition. here as I show below, hde1 is swap partition and there are
no label or uuid exists. as I know, tune2fs can add uuid or label for
ext2/ext3 partitions. How can I add uuid or label for swap partition
then?
Another question is, can I add uuid as device name in grub's menu.lst?
(something like kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.17-2-686 root=3D/dev/sde2 ro)
cc:~# /lib/udev/vol_id /dev/hde1
ID_FS_USAGE=3Dother
ID_FS_TYPE=3Dswap
ID_FS_VERSION=3D2
ID_FS_UUID=3D
ID_FS_UUID_ENC=3D
ID_FS_LABEL=3D
ID_FS_LABEL_ENC=3D
ID_FS_LABEL_SAFE=3D
cc:~# /lib/udev/vol_id /dev/hde2
ID_FS_USAGE=3Dfilesystem
ID_FS_TYPE=3Dext3
ID_FS_VERSION=3D1.0
ID_FS_UUID=3Db9599834-8d37-41fb-9389-c3394c9ea21f
ID_FS_UUID_ENC=3Db9599834-8d37-41fb-9389-c3394c9ea21f
ID_FS_LABEL=3D
ID_FS_LABEL_ENC=3D
ID_FS_LABEL_SAFE=3D
cc:~# tune2fs -l /dev/hde2 | grep UUID
Filesystem UUID: b9599834-8d37-41fb-9389-c3394c9ea21f
cc:~#
Owen Townend =D0=B4=B5=C0:
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:02:32 +1100 From: Ron Savage <ron@savage.net.au> To: List - Debian Users <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: Windows programs report 1 cpu, Debian and Ubuntu report 2 Message-ID: <472E87C8.8080502@savage.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Problem: Windows programs report 1 cpu, Debian and Ubuntu report 2. Prior art: I've scanned the subjects of debian-user emails from Apr to Nov, but didn't see this problem discussed. Hardware: 2 hard disks, Win2K on 1 and the following on the other... Install history: Thu Nov 1: Debian 4.0 Fri Nov 2: Ubuntu 7.10 Sat Nov 3: Ubuntu 7.04 and then Debian 4.0 and then Ubuntu 7.10 Sun Nov 4: FreeBSD 6.2 and then Debian 4.0 Reports: Hardware as seen by Belarc Security Advisor under Windows: http://savage.net.au/debian.ubuntu/win2k.belarc.report.html (inc mobo) And as seen by CPUINFO under Windows: http://savage.net.au/debian.ubuntu/win2k.cpuinfo.png And as seen by lspci under Debian 4.0: http://savage.net.au/debian.ubuntu/debian.4.0.lspci.log And as seen by lspci under Ubuntu 7.04: http://savage.net.au/debian.ubuntu/ubuntu.7.04.lspci.log And as seen by lspci under Ubuntu 7.10: http://savage.net.au/debian.ubuntu/ubuntu.7.10.lspci.log And as seen by /proc/cpuinfo under Debian 4.0: http://savage.net.au/debian.ubuntu/debian.4.0.proc.cpuinfo.log And as seen by /proc/cpuinfo under Ubuntu 7.04: http://savage.net.au/debian.ubuntu/ubuntu.7.04.proc.cpuinfo.log And as seen by /proc/cpuinfo under Ubuntu 7.10: http://savage.net.au/debian.ubuntu/ubuntu.7.10.proc.cpuinfo.log And as seen by system monitor under Debian 4.0: http://savage.net.au/debian.ubuntu/debian.4.0.system.monitor.png And as seen by system monitor under Ubuntu 7.04: http://savage.net.au/debian.ubuntu/ubuntu.7.04.system.monitor.png And as seen by system monitor under Ubuntu 7.10: http://savage.net.au/debian.ubuntu/ubuntu.7.10.system.monitor.png Any ideas why the OSes don't agree on the CPU count? Please don't bother posting cynicism about Windows, or wild guesses. And, yes, I've heard some dual-core chips with 1 faulty core are sold as mono-core, but even that doesn't explain the discrepancy. TIA. -- Ron Savage ron@savage.net.au http://savage.net.au/index.html End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #2742 ************************************************** Received on Sun Nov 4 22:33:22 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 02:55:57 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||