"Do this: dpkg --get-selections | grep ssh and send the results. I am
<br>wondering if you have the openssh-server installed. You can get everything<br>by just doing aptitude install ssh."<br><br># dpkg --get-selections | grep ssh<br>openssh-client install
<br>openssh-server deinstall<br>#<br><br></div><span class="sg">Thanks to everyone for your help.<br><br>Maybe I should remove ssh and reinstall?<br><br>John<br><br></span><br>
------=_Part_23671_12564999.1194292223145--
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:03:27 -0500
From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ssh port not opening
Message-ID: <20071105200327.GA8357@titan.hooton>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 07:50:23PM +0000, John O Laoi wrote:
> # dpkg --get-selections | grep ssh
> openssh-client install
> openssh-server deinstall
> #
>
Looks like there's your problem. You don't have openssh-server
installed.
Doug.
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:10:15 -0700
From: John Schmidt <john.andrew.schmidt@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ssh port not opening
Message-Id: <200711051310.16230.john.andrew.schmidt@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Monday 05 November 2007, John O Laoi wrote:
> # dpkg --get-selections | grep ssh
> openssh-client install
> openssh-server deinstall
> #
>
> Thanks to everyone for your help.
>
> Maybe I should remove ssh and reinstall?
>
aptitude install openssh-server
This should solve your problems.
John
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:08:21 +0000
From: "John O Laoi" <brianolaoi@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: ssh port not opening
Message-ID: <1f1816a90711051308s4cb1e06awae100b7129be184e@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_24025_17048837.1194296901722"
------=_Part_24025_17048837.1194296901722
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
"Looks like there's your problem. You don't have openssh-server
installed."
"aptitude install openssh-server
>
> This should solve your problems."
Thanks everyone. That did it.
I suppose that I should have done
#aptitude install ssh openssh-server
in the first place.
John
------=_Part_24025_17048837.1194296901722
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<div><div><br>"Looks like there's your problem. You don't have openssh-server<br>installed."<br> </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
"aptitude install openssh-server<br><br>This should solve your problems."</blockquote><div><br><br>Thanks everyone. That did it.<br>I suppose that I should have done<br>#aptitude install ssh openssh-server<br>in the first place.
<br><br>John<br></div><br></div><br>
------=_Part_24025_17048837.1194296901722--
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:14:05 +0000
From: steef <steefvanduin@zonnet.nl>
To: debian <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: alsaplayer does not work as normal user -> Solved!
Message-ID: <472F879D.8030404@zonnet.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Jose Roberto B. de A. Monteiro wrote:
> steef wrote:
>
>> Jose Roberto B. de A. Monteiro wrote:
>>
>>> steef wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Jose Roberto B. de A. Monteiro wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hello list,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was with my sound (alsa) work perfectly on my laptop, but for an
>>>>> unremembered reason I ran alsoconf as root. It causes the strange
>>>>> behavior of alsplayer, aplay, etc., to stop working for normal users.
>>>>> They only run for root. I checked groups and permissions, and it seems
>>>>> ok. All users are in group audio, as well as related devices and proc
>>>>> files. I do not want to install all the system again, so I wonder if
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> took the time to study your first email. i agree with andrei. you
>> *could* study alsaconf. my hda-intel chip works fine under etch and
>> lenny with the latest alsadriver from the alsa-website.
>>
>> a question: are you using the alsadriver built into in the debian
>> kernel in lenny?
>>
>> reg.,
>> steef
>>
> Solved! Sorry to spent away your time... the error is because alsconf> created ~/.asoundrc and ~/.asoundrc.asoundconf with something that> crashed alsaplayer and related stuff. I removed them and sound started> working again... Even skype was not working and now it is working...
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
good to read you solved this problem!
good luck,
steef
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:35:22 -0800
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ssh port not opening
Message-ID: <20071105213522.GA23645@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE"
Content-Disposition: inline
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:08:21PM +0000, John O Laoi wrote:
> "Looks like there's your problem. You don't have openssh-server
> installed."
>=20
>=20
> "aptitude install openssh-server> >> > This should solve your problems."
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Thanks everyone. That did it.> I suppose that I should have done> #aptitude install ssh openssh-server> in the first place.
one of the first things I did when you posted was look at `apt-cache
show ssh` and it depends on openssh-server, so that should have been
installed. I'm on sid, so maybe the dependencies are different, but
youmight want to investigate why it didn't get pulled in to your
system. Or what you may have done to inadvertently remove it.
A
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHL4yaaIeIEqwil4YRAu6+AJ9Xu90ix/rOvRNhk/HpqbazVtJMuQCgn69J
ZOFcVDvZW9k+6a3bnpTPvTo=
=crSs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:19:37 -0600
From: Andreas Goesele <Goesele@hfph.mwn.de>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: oleo somebody?
Message-Id: <87mytsxudy.fsf@hfph.mwn.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi,
is somebody actually using oleo?
I had a look at it and it seems in theory to fulfill exactly my needs.
But I do have some problems which in fact make it rather unusable:
- The manual says that it is possible to write to a LaTeX file. But
the command M-C-p only brings up the choice to either write to an
ASCII or a postscript file. "M-C-p l" results in nothing. Looking at
the code I also get the strong impression that the possibility to
write to a LaTeX file is not implemented. (1.99.16-7) Correct?
- Trying to print to an postscript file gives an error message:
"AfmFontWidth: failed". The resulting postscript file is not usable
with gs. Ghostscript gives the following error messages:
Error: /undefinedGPL Ghostscript 8.01: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
in 20,0
Operand stack:
Execution stack:
%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval--
Dictionary stack:
--dict:1051/1123(ro)(G)-- --dic
3. According to the manual "C-x C-s" saves using the current
file-format. But I didn't find anything in the documentation how to
accutally set this format. If I open a file let's say in the sc format
using even the option "-F sc" the file is transformed into the oleo
format and saving results in a file in the oleo format.
>From the manual I gather that it should be possible to set the file
format using "M-x set-option file". But I don't find the correct
format to set this option. "M-x set-option file" results in something
like for instance: "Unknown option 'S[@U]'". (The exact error message
changes all the time.) "M-x set-option file sc" results in "Unknow
option 'sc'". "M-x set-option file=sc" results in "Unknow option
'file=sc'". So what is the correct way to set this option?
Thanks a lot in advance!
Andreas Goesele
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 23:22:30 +0100
From: Mauro Darida <robertnospam@nonsense.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: salome in debian etch
Message-Id: <200711052322.30332.robertnospam@nonsense.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
hello all,
I am trying to install salome in debian etch. At the salome website I have
downloaded the sarge tarball (there is none for etch).
The install wizard says mine is a "not supported linux platform" because is
not sarge and recognise only gcc of my system; it wants to install form its
binaries the rest of the software (even Opencascade 6.2, whichi is installed
on my system, is not recognised).
If I press the help button of the installer and search about the software
checking process, it says that "the general rule is that the path to the
binaries should be set via PATH environment variable, path to the library
should be set via LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable and the python modules should be
available via PYTHONPATH variable".
I think I have identified almost all the debian packages which are the
dependencies of salome:
libtool
tk8.4
python
sip4
puthon-qt3
libomniorb4c2
libhdf5-serial-1.65.-0
libvtk5
graphviz
doxygen
python-docutils
automake
autoconf
After installing them, I tried to experiment with tk8.4, putting
in /etc/profile:
TCLHOME=/usr/lib/tk8.4
export TCLHOME
but the installer keeps saying it will install it from its binaries. Is there
anyone who has tried to install salome without re-installing all the system
software?
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 22:40:09 UT
From: Sciencemail Monitor <hirlevel@mail.sciencemail.eu>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: .
Message-Id:
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:42:43 -0000
From: BartlebyScrivener <bscrivener42@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Programmers Text Editor
Message-ID: <1194302563.710231.100800@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Nov 5, 6:30 am, Nate Bargmann <n...@networksplus.net> wrote:
> I've begun to see the need for an editor that works
> with them. So, I have been inspired by this thread to investigate
> Emacs again.
I would not dismiss Vim out of hand.
http://www.debian-administration.org/polls/89
I have to work on both Windows and Debian, and Vim works in both
places. Getting Emacs to run on Windows is a pain in the neck.
rd
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 00:10:21 +0100
From: Gerard Robin <g.robin3@free.fr>
To: debian <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Could not adjust time
Message-ID: <20071105231020.GA11773@free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:23:20AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>From: Andrew Sackville-West
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: Could not adjust time
>Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>X-Spam_score: -4.4
>X-Spam_score_int: -43
>X-Spam_bar: ----
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=3D-4.388 tagged_above=3D3.6 required=3D5.3
> tests=3D[AWL=3D2.477, BAYES_00=3D-2, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=3D0.135,
> LDO_WHITELIST=3D-5]
>X-Spam-Level:=20
>
>On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:48:45AM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 09:08:48AM -0500, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>> > hce wrote:
>> > >=20
>> > > I press the right button of the mouse to the clock time on the panel,
>> > > but there is not adjust time to change the time. What is missing ...
>> >=20
>> > Insufficient information to come up with a solution. Is it KDE or gnom=
e or
>> > some other desktop environment? What panel are you running, Which vers=
ion
>> > of the panel program is it? What is your distribution (stable, testing,
>> > unstable)? If you do not want to be bothered with all this then just u=
se
>> > the date command as Gerard suggested.
>> >=20
>>=20
>> Also, how is an ordinary user supposed to click on anything and change
>> the system time. Root shouldn't be running X to be able to change the
>> system time. Unless the thing the user clicks on links to some su
>> system.
>
>In GNOME (wife's machine), right clicking the panel clock gives and
>"Adjust Date & Time" option, which invokes some gnome-sudo hook.
I use gnome on my laptop and I can adjust the time as you say, but in
fact, I have installed the package ntp and after that no need to use
date or other program to get accurate time.
--=20
G=E9rard
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:10:50 -0800
From: David Brodbeck <brodbd@u.washington.edu>
To: debian user list <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Programmers Text Editor
Message-Id: <65291255-5496-44B6-B757-A253476E23F1@u.washington.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Nov 5, 2007, at 2:42 PM, BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> On Nov 5, 6:30 am, Nate Bargmann <n...@networksplus.net> wrote:
>
>> I've begun to see the need for an editor that works
>> with them. So, I have been inspired by this thread to investigate
>> Emacs again.
>
> I would not dismiss Vim out of hand.
>
> http://www.debian-administration.org/polls/89
>
> I have to work on both Windows and Debian, and Vim works in both> places. Getting Emacs to run on Windows is a pain in the neck.
I think it comes down to personal taste. I just can't get the hang
of vi. I use it when I have to, but after years of using it off and
on I still do things like accidentally insert 127 copies of the
letter 'a' into my file. Using vi requires you to keep track of the
editor's state in your head -- you have to remember whether it's in
input mode or command mode. I've never been able to do that reliably.
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 18:19:06 -0500
From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: salome in debian etch
Message-ID: <20071105231906.GB9036@titan.hooton>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:22:30PM +0100, Mauro Darida wrote:
> I am trying to install salome in debian etch. At the salome website I have
> downloaded the sarge tarball (there is none for etch).
Installing Sarge apps like salome will turn Etch into a delicatessen.
Sorry.
What is salome?
If it comes as pre-compiled binaries, keep in mind it will be built with
a different version of libc6 than Etch uses.
Doug.
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 18:23:18 -0500
From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Programmers Text Editor
Message-ID: <20071105232318.GC9036@titan.hooton>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 03:10:50PM -0800, David Brodbeck wrote:
> I think it comes down to personal taste. I just can't get the hang
> of vi. I use it when I have to, but after years of using it off and
> on I still do things like accidentally insert 127 copies of the
> letter 'a' into my file. Using vi requires you to keep track of the
> editor's state in your head -- you have to remember whether it's in
> input mode or command mode. I've never been able to do that reliably.
My vim (not vi) tells me at the bottom of the screen. Right now it
says:
What about nano? mcedit?
Doug.
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:39:54 -0800
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Programmers Text Editor
Message-ID: <20071105233954.GC23645@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
--YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 06:23:18PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 03:10:50PM -0800, David Brodbeck wrote:
> =20
> > I think it comes down to personal taste. I just can't get the hang =20
> > of vi. I use it when I have to, but after years of using it off and =
=20
> > on I still do things like accidentally insert 127 copies of the =20
> > letter 'a' into my file. Using vi requires you to keep track of the =
=20
> > editor's state in your head -- you have to remember whether it's in =20
> > input mode or command mode. I've never been able to do that reliably.
>=20
> My vim (not vi) tells me at the bottom of the screen. Right now it> says:
>=20
> -- INSERT -- 13,66 All
>=20
> What about nano? mcedit?
>=20
I'm that rare bird that uses *both* with an abysmal lack of efficiency
in both. I use vim for editing conf files and general hacking around
the system. I use emacs when I'm actually coding (usually scheme or C)
and find myself able to switch easily between them. I know though that
I am missing large parts of the functionality of both programs.=20
In a fit of perversion some while back I changed the default editor
for mutt to emacs with a custom config file... mwuhahahahaha!!!
and more and more I just use cat > some_file for one off
stuff. followed by sed -i -e 's/typo/correction/'. now that's
absurdity for ya!
A
--YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHL6nKaIeIEqwil4YRAoRZAJ4tIHEq1QJK8DRecM2ISAfz3Q25vACgoU00
FperdlSXZ4FzSMbIpcJdHjs=
=4i38
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ--
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:38:18 -0800
From: David Brodbeck <brodbd@u.washington.edu>
To: debian user list <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Programmers Text Editor
Message-Id: <111E7D81-3CED-4B41-AB4A-A570FFE46DDB@u.washington.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Nov 5, 2007, at 3:23 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> My vim (not vi) tells me at the bottom of the screen. Right now it
> says:
>
> -- INSERT --
> 13,66 All
Yeah, that's the case on maybe a third of the systems I use. (For me
vi is usually an 'editor of last resort,' used on things like rescue
CDs that don't have any other visual editor. So the version I'm
using is often a very stripped-down one.)
>
> What about nano? mcedit?
I really wouldn't recommend nano for programming. It lacks some
pretty basic functionality, like the ability to quickly skip to the
top or bottom of a file.
I've become an Emacs user, but before that I used "joe" pretty
religiously. I blame this largely on having been brought up on
WordStar. ;)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:49:56 -0800 (PST)
From: "Steve Lamb" <grey@dmiyu.org>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Programmers Text Editor
Message-ID: <21617.206.159.183.75.1194306596.squirrel@www.dmiyu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
David Brodbeck wrote:
> Using vi requires you to keep track of the
> editor's state in your head -- you have to remember whether it's in
> input mode or command mode. I've never been able to do that reliably.
Neither have I. However I did learn early on in my vim life that ESC=
in
insert mode puts you in command mode. ESC in command mode puts you in
command mode. So if you're not sure, just slap escape then you are
sure. :))
--=20
Steve Lamb
End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #2749
Received on Mon Nov 5 19:09:11 2007