Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:53:45 -0500
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?jesus_erdeny_andrade_fandi=F1o?=" <erdeny6@gmail.com>
To: cbarajas@senavirtual.edu.co, champetux@listas.lintecsa.com, daer13@gmail.com,
daer@conexcol.com, darh17@gmail.com,
debian-amd64-request@lists.debian.org,
debian-devel-spanish-request@lists.debian.org,
debian-knoppix-request@lists.debian.org,
debian-l10n-spanish-request@lists.debian.org,
debian-laespiral-request@lists.debian.org,
debian-news-spanish-request@lists.debian.org,
debian-security-announce-request@lists.debian.org,
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org,
debian-user-spanish-request@lists.debian.org,
debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org,
debian-win32-request@lists.debian.org,
dia1renacedetuscenizas@yahoo.com.ar,
dia2renacedetuscenizas@yahoo.com.ar, dpajares@montevideo.com.uy,
edna.alejandra25@gmail.com, edna.margarita.diaz@gmail.com,
edna_alejandra25@hotmail.com, erdeny256@yahoo.es,
erdeny6@hotmail.com, exequiel@hannachile.com, fabianzab@yahoo.com,
fernanditavanegas@gmail.com, gerfracas@gmail.com, gfc@etb.net.co,
ibc.listas@aliax.net, ibc.listas@gmail.com, ilegal18@hotmail.com,
javier.flores.aldape@gmail.com, jgualtero@gmail.com,
john.marcor6@gmail.com, john.marcor6@hotmail.com
Subject: Gana dinero
Message-ID: <bce7c8ce0711281353s3bbff183u49fef4865d74dd19@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_6434_6892819.1196286825512"
------=_Part_6434_6892819.1196286825512
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Recientemente he probado una forma de ganar dinero y ha estado funcionado,
consiste en lo siguiente.
una empresa te paga porque visites paginas que ellos te dan, solo tienes qu=
e
visitar la pagina por 30 segundos y la empresa te paga, yo he probado y
diariamente me dan 10 paginas para visitar, por esas 10 visitas diarias me
pagan us $0.10, casi nada al mes serian 3 dolares, pero para ganar mas lo
que debemos hacer es meter mas gentea nuestro nombre, haciendo cuentas
por 20 personas que se inscriban a nuestro nombre seria algo como
por 20 personas y que cada una visite 10 paginas al dia nos ingresaria esto
a nuestra cuenta =3D $2.00
diariamente ganarias =3D $2
y en el mes ganarias 60 dolares bastante mejor no!
weno cuando tengas mas de 10 dolares puedes transferir tu dinero hacia una
cuenta de paypal, y de paypal pides que te envien un cheque.
La pregunta del millon es si es verdad, pues les explico como funciona el
modelo de negocios.
una empresa que nesecita visitas le paga a BUX para que usuarios visiten
sus paginas, BUX lo que hace es pagarle un porcentaje a los usuarios para
que visiten las paginas, de esa forma gana BUX y los usuarios.
ahora si te parece logico y viable los pasos para registrarte son estos.
- primero debes crear una cuenta en paypal que es dnd te transfieren el
dinero
https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=3D_registration-run
sigue los pasos y cuando te pidan la tarjeta de credito le das en cancelar =
y
listo ya tienes cuenta de paypal
2: crea la cuenta en bux.to http://bux.to/?r=3Derdeny6
luego dale click en (Join now and receive a $0.05 Sign-up Bonus) y sigue
los pasos que te indiquen
3: una vez inscrito dale click en (Surf Ads) y visita las paginas que te
aparecen IMPORTANTE VISITA UNA PAGINA A LA VEZ, NO ABRAS TODAS DE UNA VEZ,
para que te hagan efectivo el pago visita la pagina por 30 segundos
terminado el tiempo aparece un mensaje en la parte de arriba (DONE)
acompa=F1ado de un chulito, luego cierras esa ventana y sigues con la otra,
asi lo puedes hacer diariamente, ahora tu puedes ganar mas dinero lo unico
que debes hacer es meter gente a tu nombre.
espero que este correo no halla sido una molestia y te puedas registrar
------=_Part_6434_6892819.1196286825512
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
<div>Recientemente he probado una forma de ganar dinero y ha estado funcion=
ado, consiste en lo siguiente.<br><br>una
empresa te paga porque visites paginas que ellos te dan, solo tienes
que visitar la pagina por 30 segundos y la empresa te paga, yo he
probado y diariamente me dan 10 paginas para visitar, por esas 10
visitas diarias me pagan us $0.10, casi nada al mes serian 3 do=
lares,
pero para ganar mas lo que debemos hacer es meter mas gentea nuestro
nombre, haciendo cuentas
por 20 personas que se inscriban a nuestro=
nombre seria algo como
por 20 personas y que cada una visite 10 pag=
inas al dia nos ingresaria esto a nuestra cuenta =3D $2.00
diariamente g=
anarias =3D $2=20
<br>y en el mes ganarias 60 dolares bastante mejor no!=20
<br><br>weno cuando tengas mas de 10 dolares puedes transferir tu
dinero hacia una cuenta de paypal, y de paypal pides que te envien un
cheque. <br><br>La pregunta del millon es si es verdad, pues les explico co=
mo funciona el modelo de negocios.=20
<br><br>una empresa que nesecita visitas le paga a BUX para que
usuarios visiten sus paginas, BUX lo que hace es pagarle un porcentaje
a los usuarios para que visiten las paginas, de esa forma gana BUX y
los usuarios.<br>
<br>ahora si te parece logico y viable los pasos para registrarte son estos=
.
1: primero debes crear una cuenta en paypal que es dnd te transfie=
ren el dinero
https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/w=
ebscr?cmd=3D_registration-run" target=3D"_blank" onclick=3D"return top.js.O=
penExtLink(window,event,this)">
https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=3D_registration-run
sigue los pasos y cuando te pidan la tarjeta de credito le das en cancelar=
y listo ya tienes cuenta de paypal
2: crea la cuenta en http://bux.to/" target=3D"_blank" onclick=3D"return top.js.OpenExtLink(win=
dow,event,this)">
bux.to http://bux.to/?r=3Derdeny6" target=3D"_blank" onclick=
=3D"return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://bux.to/?r=3Derdeny=
6
luego dale click en (Join now and receive a $0.05 =
=09=09=09=09=09=09Sign-up Bonus) y sigue los pasos que te indiquen=20
<br><br>3:
una vez inscrito dale click en (Surf Ads) y visita las paginas que te
aparecen IMPORTANTE VISITA UNA PAGINA A LA VEZ, NO ABRAS TODAS DE UNA
VEZ, para que te hagan efectivo el pago visita la pagina por 30
segundos terminado el tiempo aparece un mensaje en la parte de arriba
(DONE) acompa=F1ado de un chulito, luego cierras esa ventana y sigues con
la otra, asi lo puedes hacer diariamente, ahora tu puedes ganar mas
dinero lo unico que debes hacer es meter gente a tu nombre. <br><br>espero =
que este correo no halla sido una molestia y te puedas registrar
</div>
------=_Part_6434_6892819.1196286825512--
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:14:48 +0100
From: Davide Mancusi <arekfu@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Jerky Mouse
Message-ID: <474DE858.3060304@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Axel Schlicht ha scritto:
> I installed the latest incarnation of Debian i386 (4.01R1) and X runs OK
> (with no manual fiddling - first time ever, whow). But one problem remains:
> My mouse (or rather mice, for I tried several), connected to a PS2 port
> run smoothly under Win2K and Knoppix 4 and 5. Unfortunately, they don't
> do so under Debian. Instead of gliding continuously over the screen they
> rather jump. So everything requiring a mouse, e.g., web browsing,
> drawing (tgif, xfig etc.) is almost impossible.
> Without going into detail here - mostly because I am completely lost - I
> would like to ask for general assistance: What might cause such
> behavior, where do I have to tamper with config files if necessary, and
> are there some sources on how to solve such problems, read: hardware
> works under other flavors, but behaves strangely under debian.
Hi Axel,
I once had similar problems and I think I had tracked them down to the
device that was specified in the InputDevice section of xorg.conf. A
safe choice should be /dev/input/mice, but the world would be a very
boring place if everything worked at the same way for everyone. Do not
be afraid to experiment with other devfiles in /dev/input/.
Hope that helps!
Davide
--
A tautology is a thing which is tautological.
--
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:26:23 -0900
From: Ken Irving <fnkci@uaf.edu>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: How do you make your life secure (software based)?
Message-ID: <20071128222623.GA4728@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:39:48PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Would you notice a hardware key-capture dongle inserted between your
> keyboard and PC? Even were I to use OpenBSD and pervasive
> encryption, I wouldn't notice such a device, since I never look
> behind my PC. Front-mounted ieee1394 and USB ports have eliminated
> the need.
>
> (Hmmm, I bet that front-mounted ports are a secret mandate from the
> gov't to ensure that people don't look behind their computers
> anymore...)
Not the same thing, exactly, but I've been somewhat alarmed to see
the tellers at a local bank typing away on wireless keyboards, and
this in a student union building with laptops all over the place.
I wonder how feasible (or trivial?) it would be to capture some of
those keystrokes?
--
Ken Irving, fnkci+debianuser@uaf.edu
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:23:55 +0900
From: David <davidpalmer@westnet.com.au>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Jerky Mouse
Message-ID: <474DEA7B.8010802@westnet.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Richard Lyons wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:08:41PM +0100, Axel Schlicht wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I installed the latest incarnation of Debian i386 (4.01R1) and X runs OK
>> (with no manual fiddling - first time ever, whow). But one problem remains:
>> My mouse (or rather mice, for I tried several), connected to a PS2 port
>> run smoothly under Win2K and Knoppix 4 and 5. Unfortunately, they don't
>> do so under Debian. Instead of gliding continuously over the screen they
>> rather jump. So everything requiring a mouse, e.g., web browsing,
>> drawing (tgif, xfig etc.) is almost impossible.
>
> Have you installed gpm? Which might be part of the answer...
>
It might be worth trying to reconfigure xserver-xorg.
Not just for the mouse but for the frame buffering option also.
When I first installed Etch, a few days ago on a fax machine, I couldn't
get the mouse to work at all.
Changing mouse options in Xserver, and also getting rid of adapters
trying to fit a ps2 mouse to a com port, and restarting fixed it.
A number of things can effect X, including a recurring situation with
different releases, of no smooth install of fonts into a native directory.
This has screwed X install for me on a number of occasions,
necessitating rewriting directory specs, predating Xorg and after.
Regards,
David.
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:28:59 +0900
From: David <davidpalmer@westnet.com.au>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: PS Editors.
Message-ID: <474DEBAB.6050506@westnet.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:41:38AM +0900, David wrote:
>> I've just configured a small fax server soon to be connected to a new
>> network, but with its own 56K modem access.
>> Efax-gtk and Kfax seem to be the flavours that work, for receiving anyway.
>> I'm sure for sending as well - I just have to get the format right.
>>
>> I installed abiword as an editor, but the expected PS facility doesn't
>> seem to be there.
>> Surely I'm missing something?
>>
>> What seems to work for everybody else?
>>
>> I'm currently looking at these two packages.
>>
>> http://packages.debian.org/etch/flpsed
>>
>> http://packages.debian.org/etch/shanty
>>
>> One for editing and the other for creating a standard coversheet format
>> that would be acceptable to a fax programme.
>>
>> Has anybody had any experience with these?
>> Thanks for any time and trouble.
>
> Last time I set up a fax server (send and receive), I did it with
> mgetty+fax (and mgetty+voice so handle the distinctive ring function).
> I was using LPRng at the time so that the fax appeared as a standard
> printer.
>
> This way, any editor or whathaveyou can send a fax. IIRC, the standard
> fax cover page I wrote with Lout (which was my document processing
> system at the time) to produce the postscript file.
>
> Doug.
>
>
Thanks for this.
Regards,
David.
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:50:19 -0800
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: troubleshoot lockups
Message-ID: <20071128225019.GK3386@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VSJGZE3ajDCqFLUt"
Content-Disposition: inline
--VSJGZE3ajDCqFLUt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:02:24PM -0800, BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> On Nov 28, 1:20 pm, Andrew Sackville-West
> <and...@farwestbilliards.com> wrote:
>=20
> These key combos I never even heard of. Ditto. I'll try them if it
> happens again.
google on "magic sysrq" for more info.
A
--VSJGZE3ajDCqFLUt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHTfCraIeIEqwil4YRAiI+AJ9QDbsNuepP5Z509rIpfehYF70pzgCeI/Bv
Y395Y22K0OFtXpb1Eyaplxk=
=l/S1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--VSJGZE3ajDCqFLUt--
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:07:07 +0800
From: Jerome BENOIT <jgmbenoit@mailsnare.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: how to detect the number of processors ?
Message-ID: <474DE68B.6050808@mailsnare.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
thanks for your answers.
strawks wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> sorry, I forgot to tell that `/proc/cpuinfo'
>> shows up _two_ processors (when the kernel is a SMP one).
>>
>> Furthermore,
>> the concerned black box is a very old one:
>> before september 2003 (kernel 2.4.22).
>>
>> According to `/proc/cpuinfo', there are two
>>
>> Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz (model name)
>>
>> with `stepping' 9.
>
> Maybe it's not present in the 2.4 kernels, but there is now a physical
> id line in /proc/cpuinfo. If your 2 processors have the same physical
> id, it's a dual core or a P4 HT (Hyperthreading).
> I think it's probably a P4 HT. To be sure check the presence of the flag
> "ht".
>
>> As I may need a lot of CPU time, I would like to know
>> if it makes sense to install a SMP kernel on this black
>> box (and its shelf brothers):
>> who must I try ?
>
> If this is a P4 HT, take a look at this page :
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-htl/
Indeed I have a P4 HT :
must I build a SMP kernel as suggested by Knoppix ?
> If it's a dual core yes you should install a SMP kernel to take
> advantage of the 2 cores.
>
>
>> Can a SMP kernel be confused by a one CPU computer
>> (and announce two CPU instead of one).
>
> I don't think the kernel could show 2 CPUs if there is only one, as each
> CPU are initialized one after another.
>
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT
jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:13 +0100
From: Jochen Schulz <ml@well-adjusted.de>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: How do you make your life secure (software based)?
Message-ID: <20071128230011.GA32648@wasteland.homelinux.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS"
Content-Disposition: inline
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
(Since were completely OT, you may want to reply to me privately.)
Ron Johnson:
> On 11/28/07 03:48, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> [snip]
>>=20
>> To end my my rant: the German minister of Interior Politics recently
>> said to critics that he agrees with them in that there is a "red line"
>> which lawmakers should not cross in the "fight against terrorism". This
>> line is drawn by our constitution. But, he said, if this line stops him
>> from doing what he thinks is necessary, one can still change the
>> constitution.
>>=20
>> So much for his loyalty to our constitution.
>=20
> How difficult is it to amend the German constitution?
You need a 2/3 majority of all attending members of the Bundestag (most
important German federal parliament). While this is usually quite
difficult to achieve, currently it is technically possible because the
government consists of the two major German parties (CDU/CSU + SPD,
"Gro=DFe Koalition") who occupy 446 of 613 seats in the Bundestag.
> FWIW, the US Constitution *could* be amended to turn the country
> into a (literal) Satanic Dictatorship. Then, all sorts of nasty
> "Satanic" stuff would be completely constitutional.
Legally this is impossible in Germany because a part our constitution is
protected by the "Ewigkeitsgarantie" (=A779/3, guarantee of eternity), a
paragraph stating that the constitution may not be altered in a way
contradicting =A71 and =A720.
=A71 essentially says that the protection of human dignity and human
rights has to be the basic motivation for every more specific law (even
taxes ;-)). =A720 codifies Germany as a federal state which draws its
power directly from its people. State power is seperated into judiciary,
legislature and executive and bound by the law. Finally, =A720 even gives
every citizen the right to (forceful) resistance against anyone who
tries to abolish this order.
Both the Ewigkeitsgarantie and the right of resistance are lessons
learned from the deficiencies of the Weimarer Republik which made
Hitler's (perfectly legal) rise to power possible.
Funny side aspect: our constitution is called "Grundgesetz" (basic law)
because its authors in 1949 wanted the German people to freely give
itself a new constitution after reunification with the sector occupied
by the Soviets. But although reunification happened in 1990, for minor
legal issues no poll by the people concerning its constitution has
happened at that time, and never since.
J.
--=20
I cannot comprehend the idea of chemical and biological weapons.
[Agree] [Disagree]
<http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHTfL7+AfZydWK2zkRApyLAJ9tsQii+61WW8LmQ9V3fkAkVh/B/gCfUbC6
Myt6G4oYHCkZTdjJ7SOiuYs=
=XhQB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS--
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:55:02 +0100
From: Thierry Chatelet <tchatelet@free.fr>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problems booting AMD64 Dual Core
Message-Id: <200711282355.02661.tchatelet@free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 22:24, I.E.Broadbent wrote:
> Anyone have any comments or suggestions please.
>
> Anyone heard of any problems with the CPU's or Boards mentioned above?
>
> Thanks, Ian
Hi, I got a similar problem, which was soulve by increasing the voltage on the
memories sticks. No idea if it can help, sorry, but it's worth a try.
Thierry
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:56:54 +0100
From: Thierry Chatelet <tchatelet@free.fr>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Top-posting (was Re: CD to acc)
Message-Id: <200711282356.54135.tchatelet@free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 22:29, Robert Hodgins wrote:
No, as a good practice, you should remove everything that is not relevant to
the answer you give.
Thierry
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:33:25 -0800 (PST)
From: bobg.hahc@gmail.com
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: LDAP - howto get linux to talk to exchange/AD
Message-ID: <55f93090-10b1-4f64-9d46-ac36f1d101ce@j20g2000hsi.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
at the end of the day, this is what I want: my debian(etch)/exim
machine to accept all internet Email to
my domain, ignore all else, and relay on to my exchange 5.5 server.
This means I want exim to validate
email recipients thru ldap lookups.
seems like a simple enough task, even one that many people have
probably done. Can I find any examples
of an exim config file that demonstrates this? NO! doc's suck. So I
have no idea if my router config is
even close or not. I don't think I need an acl, but i'm not sure. such
a simple task, you'd think
there'd already be a sample config file out there somewhere....
Having said that, I'm trying to figure out why my ldap lookup's aren't
working, so that leads me down a
nasty diagnostic path.
1) can you do ldap queries using telnet? I seem to connect to my
server fine, but every query I insert,
returns nothing.
2) i'm trying to do ldap lookups using ldapsearch, and I'm not having
any luck at all, and i'm getting
useless error messages.
3) ldap is definitely running on exchange, because an ldap://server/query
entry in a browser, brings up
a dialog box that will successfully search using a custom ldap string,
and it all works.
4) if I can't do a simply query using ldapsearch, how in the ---- am i
ever going to get exim setup
correctly.... what does a valid ldapsearch command look like anyway??
5) if I can't use telnet to try to diagnose what's going on - where
should I start?
TIA - Bob
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:42:12 -0600
From: "Bob Goldberg" <bobg.hahc@gmail.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: LDAP - howto get linux to talk to exchange/AD
Message-ID: <4e312cc10711281442g51a7e374yccd2a3c0fedb803@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_7599_7538683.1196289732657"
------=_Part_7599_7538683.1196289732657
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
at the end of the day, this is what I want: my debian(etch)/exim machine to
accept all internet Email to my domain, ignore all else, and relay on to my
exchange 5.5 server. This means I want exim to validate email recipients
thru ldap lookups.
seems like a simple enough task, even one that many people have probably
done. Can I find any examples of an exim config file that demonstrates this?
NO! doc's suck. So I have no idea if my router config is even close or not.
I don't think I need an acl, but i'm not sure. such a simple task, you'd
think there'd already be a sample config file out there somewhere....
Having said that, I'm trying to figure out why my ldap lookup's aren't
working, so that leads me down a nasty diagnostic path.
1) can you do ldap queries using telnet? I seem to connect to my server
fine, but every query I insert, returns nothing.
2) i'm trying to do ldap lookups using ldapsearch, and I'm not having any
luck at all, and i'm getting useless error messages.
3) ldap is definitely running on exchange, because an ldap://server/query
entry in a browser, brings up a dialog box that will successfully search
using a custom ldap string, and it all works.
4) if I can't do a simply query using ldapsearch, how in the ---- am i ever
going to get exim setup correctly.... what does a valid ldapsearch command
look like anyway??
5) if I can't use telnet to try to diagnose what's going on - where should I
start?
TIA - Bob
------=_Part_7599_7538683.1196289732657
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
at the end of the day, this is what I want: my debian(etch)/exim machine to accept all internet Email to my domain, ignore all else, and relay on to my exchange 5.5 server. This means I want exim to validate email recipients thru ldap lookups.
<br><br>seems like a simple enough task, even one that many people have probably done. Can I find any examples of an exim config file that demonstrates this? NO! doc's suck. So I have no idea if my router config is even close or not. I don't think I need an acl, but i'm not sure. such a simple task, you'd think there'd already be a sample config file out there somewhere....
<br><br>Having said that, I'm trying to figure out why my ldap lookup's aren't working, so that leads me down a nasty diagnostic path.<br><br>1) can you do ldap queries using telnet? I seem to connect to my server fine, but every query I insert, returns nothing.
<br><br>2) i'm trying to do ldap lookups using ldapsearch, and I'm not having any luck at all, and i'm getting useless error messages.<br><br>3) ldap is definitely running on exchange, because an ldap://server/query entry in a browser, brings up a dialog box that will successfully search using a custom ldap string, and it all works.
<br><br>4) if I can't do a simply query using ldapsearch, how in the ---- am i ever going to get exim setup correctly.... what does a valid ldapsearch command look like anyway??<br><br>5) if I can't use telnet to try to diagnose what's going on - where should I start?
<br><br><br>TIA - Bob<br><br>
------=_Part_7599_7538683.1196289732657--
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:59:57 -0500
From: "David A. Parker" <dparker@utica.edu>
To: Debian User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: LDAP Authentication
Message-id: <474DE4DD.9030404@utica.edu>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hello,
I have a box running Lenny which I am trying to configure to use LDAP
(as opposed to local) user authentication. Both nss_ldap and pam_ldap
are installed from the current packages. The server it is
authenticating against is a Sun LDAP server which stores passwords as
SHA2 hashes by default. I am not able to get LDAP logins working on
this box, and the problem appears to be that there is no support for
SHA2 passwords in nss_ldap or pam_ldap. Does anyone know if this is
correct? I have tried setting pam_password to 'clear', 'crypt', 'ad',
and 'exop' with no luck. (There does not seem to be any 'sha' or 'sha2'
option.)
If we change the password from SHA2 to a UNIX crypt hash on the server
and set pam_password to 'crypt' in /etc/libnss-ldap.conf, then the LDAP
authentication works correctly.
I haven't had any luck finding answers on Google, and I can't seem to
find much documentation on using nss_ldap or pam_ldap with SHA2. Any
help or suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Dave
--
Dave Parker
Utica College Department of
Integrated Information Technology Services
Data Processing Office
(315) 792-3229
Registered Linux User #408177
End of debian-user-digest Digest V2007 Issue #2904
**************************************************
Received on Wed Nov 28 18:36:31 2007