Hosting Provided By

Why stunnel3?

From: vince <vince(at)blackholespam.net>
Date: Fri Jun 22 2007 - 07:57:25 EDT

Two versions of stunnel are available - stunnel3 and stunnel4. Normally I would expect the higher numbered version to be the most recent and better supported version.

Form some reason I don't know, I'm running stunnel3 and # apt-cache show stunnel
reports
Version: 2:3.26-dfsg-2
Replaces: stunnel4

Why has stunnel3 replaced stunnel4 on Debian? Which is really the preferred version of stunnel? Received on Fri Jun 22 08:17:30 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: csanyipal: "Re: compatible UPS - solved"
Previous message: michael: "SOLVED: courier fonts"
Next in thread: Bob Proulx: "Re: Why stunnel3?"
Reply: Bob Proulx: "Re: Why stunnel3?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 22 2007 - 08:20:02 EDT