Hosting Provided By

apt-caher or approx?

From: Andrés Ghigliazza <tizone(at)gmail.com>
Date: Fri Jun 22 2007 - 14:50:16 EDT

Hi there,

We will soon have, 5 or 6 Debian boxs (servers and desktops), in our LAN. We would like to know, if it is better to use apt-cacher o approx for the updates.

I couldn't find enough documentation of any of them, to see some features, before installing one.

Thanks very much,

tizo

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Received on Fri Jun 22 14:50:33 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Andrew J. Barr: "Re: MP3 to AMR"
Previous message: amhoov(at)gmail.com: "2.6 kernel upgrade gives garbled video (w/o X11)"
Next in thread: Sylvain Le Gall: "Re: apt-caher or approx?"
Reply: Sylvain Le Gall: "Re: apt-caher or approx?"
Reply: Javier Enrique Tiá Marín: "Re: apt-caher or approx?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 22 2007 - 15:00:01 EDT