|
|||||||||||
|
Alternative to netselect
From: - Tong - <mlist4suntong(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Fri Jun 22 2007 - 14:30:28 EDT
I had been able to use netselect before. When I tried it again just now, all sites end up with "9999 ms 30 hops 0% ok". I'm wondering why netselect fails on me. My understanding is that netselect uses ping, but ping works fine for me, but traceroute not. That means netselect actually depends on traceroute? As more and more settings don't allow traceroute to go through, is there any alternatives to netselect? thanks -- -- This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 22 2007 - 16:00:01 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||