Hosting Provided By

Re: apt-caher or approx?

From: Tod Detre <tdetre(at)pantek.com>
Date: Fri Jun 22 2007 - 17:05:18 EDT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> I cannot compare with apt-cacher since i have never used it.

I have not been impressed with apt-cacher. There have been several times I had to restart apache to get it to work again and a few times I had to go an manually delete a file because it was corrupt, but apt-cacher wouldn't download a new version.

Regards,
Tod Detre

-- Pantek, Inc. - http://www.pantek.com/ - info(at)pantek.com +1-877-LINUX-FIX - Expert Open Source Software IT Services. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGfDmNIP3eD7Sc0oYRAvT0AJ9CT/9BcojFx+2kWFr+6A+9BwUctQCfa57b Y0SA0QeEn1rZ662luu6RpCs=
=RpaR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Received on Fri Jun 22 17:05:58 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gary Parker: "Re: lost sound after dist-upgrade"
Previous message: Tyler MacDonald: "Re: Slightly annoyed question about Debian package system"
In reply to: Sylvain Le Gall: "Re: apt-caher or approx?"
Next in thread: Roberto C. Sánchez: "Re: apt-caher or approx?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 22 2007 - 17:10:02 EDT