Hosting Provided By

Re: OT: QEMU Package faster

From: Andrew J. Barr <andrew.james.barr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mon Jun 25 2007 - 19:47:37 EDT

Chris Lale <chrislale@untrammelled.co.uk> wrote:

> I believe that kqemu reduces processor load. This may be the reason
> for your different experience.

kqemu allows code to be executed directly and natively on the bare-metal processor under certain conditions. This takes QEMU's dynamic translation engine out of the picture and allows for near-native performance of x86-on-x86 (32 or 64 bit) situations.

It turns kqemu into less of an emulator and more of a virtualizer, if that makes any sense to you.

-- 
Andrew J. Barr

Woke up in my clothes again this morning,
don't know exactly where I am...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Received on Mon Jun 25 19:47:27 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Arthur Marsh: "Re: reportbug emails submit@bugs.debian.org but no response"
Previous message: Hal Vaughan: "Re: Twinview Monitor Issues (Monitor #s and Resolution)"
In reply to: Chris Lale: "Re: OT: QEMU Package faster"
Next in thread: Mike McCarty: "Re: OT: QEMU Package faster"
Reply: Mike McCarty: "Re: OT: QEMU Package faster"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 25 2007 - 19:50:04 EDT