Re: OT: QEMU Package faster

Chris Lale wrote:
>
>
> 1. QEMU is slow.

Yes, and it's a CPU hog. But, it's faster than BOCHS.

> 2. If you install kqemu, QEMU will run faster. Make sure to "modprobe kqemu
> major=0" first. QEMU will use kqemu automatically if it is installed. Run QEMU
> from a terminal window and you will get a message if it is unable to find kqemu.

I haven't been able to build kqemu. It has include path problems.

[snip]

> Alternatively, install Daniel Baumann's deb package [2] instead of the official
> QEMU package.

I'll look into that. Thanks.

> I believe that kqemu reduces processor load. This may be the reason for your
> different experience.

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related lists.debian.org Links debian-announce debian-apache debian-arm-changes debian-beowulf debian-boot debian-cd debian-cd-vendors debian-changes debian-changes-digest debian-isp debian-kde debian-laptop debian-mirrors-announce debian-news debian-security debian-security-announce debian-testing debian-user debian-user-digest Request more information about Pantek

Nope. Apparently it was a brain fart.

> So... Not off-topic after all. :)

Well, actually off-topic. Most of my testing has been on a Fedora Core machine :-)

Mike

-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org