Hosting Provided By

Re: RTF - proprietary or open?

From: Paul Johnson <baloo(at)ursine.ca>
Date: Tue Jun 26 2007 - 17:58:17 EDT

John Hasler wrote in Article <87odj4vu77.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user:

> Alan Ianson writes:

>> I believe kword supports ODF now and I hope this will continue to be the
>> case with koffice and other word processing applications like abiword in
>> the future.

>
> The problem is that most Microsoft Windows users cannot deal with ODF.
> That doesn't matter to me but to some people it is critical.

I was unaware that openoffice.org was not freely available in win32 binary form.

-- 
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): baloo@ursine.ca



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Received on Tue Jun 26 21:15:35 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Roberto C. Sánchez: "Re: RTF - proprietary or open?"
Previous message: Paul Johnson: "Re: OT: QEMU Package faster"
In reply to: John Hasler: "Re: RTF - proprietary or open?"
Next in thread: Roberto C. Sánchez: "Re: RTF - proprietary or open?"
Reply: Roberto C. Sánchez: "Re: RTF - proprietary or open?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 26 2007 - 21:20:02 EDT