|
|
| Applications |
| Mailing Lists |
| Miscellaneous |
| Operating Systems |
| Programming |
Re: Nameserver update
Date: Wed Jun 27 2007 - 14:42:51 EDT
Note to self: get rid of gmail and it's inability to handle mailing lists....
> Hi Martin,
>
> actually this is not a debian related question...
i do know but here is where the experts live :)
however, i'd post to the appropriate list but i don't know where i should go, since it's not directly related to any software nor to any OS.
details below, long story short: Is it normal that when I change the IP of my nameserver the parent nameservers aren't updated immediately (after my zone expires)?
> If you post your zone file and tell us what version, ip etc. your server
> is using, we could help you a little bit more...
using powerdns with ldap backend here and all is set up fine to my knowledge, i'll put out the dig responses.
So here's the story, we had or nameserver at (using bind syntax, typing here so forgive me typos but be assured that it _was_ fine)
@ IN NS ns10.openforce.com.
ns10 IN A 62.99.149.110
i told our provider the IP will change and now it _should_ point to the a record below like this
@ IN NS ns10.openforce.com.
ns10 IN A 81.223.107.117
so all that changes is the IP, the hostname is still the same (could that be the problem?)
com servers still report that
ns10.openforce.com. 172800 IN A 62.99.149.110 ;; actual dig output from com. servers
but they should report
ns10.openforce.com. 3600 IN A 81.223.107.117 ;; actual dig output from my nameserver
the update was on 2007-06-27 0900h GMT+1 so the question is: Can I relax, sit back and wait until the com. nameservers catch up with the changes or did something go horribly wrong?
dig info is below:
My old nameserver (bind9 actually, split views, querying the public
view of course, fine apart from that I set ns10 to point to the ip of
the new nameserver, and i reflect the serial number from the new
nameserver):
~ $ dig @62.99.149.110 openforce.com SOA
openforce.com. 1800 IN SOA ns10.openforce.com. noc.openforce.com. 1182932271 1800 900 3600 900 openforce.com. 1800 IN NS ns10.openforce.com. openforce.com. 1800 IN NS ns34.ifo.net. ns10.openforce.com. 1800 IN A 81.223.107.117;; Received 132 bytes from 62.99.149.110#53(62.99.149.110) in 21 ms
My new nameserver (added the ns34 since debugging our provider showed that regardless of what they tell me ns24 and ns34 reflect the same information, ns34 will probably be removed, but the parent servers say ns34 is repsonsible but I never had it in my zone up to the point where I told them that the my nameservers IP changed): ~ $ dig @81.223.107.117 openforce.com SOA openforce.com. 3600 IN SOA ns10.openforce.com. noc.openforce.com. 1182950545 1800 900 3600 900 ;; Received 89 bytes from 81.223.107.117#53(81.223.107.117) in 66 ms
~ $ dig @81.223.107.117 openforce.com NS
openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns24.ifo.net. openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns10.openforce.com. openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns34.ifo.net. ns10.openforce.com. 3600 IN A 81.223.107.117;; Received 111 bytes from 81.223.107.117#53(81.223.107.117) in 27 ms
My DNS Providers nameserver:
~ $ dig @ns24.ifo.net openforce.com SOA openforce.com. 3600 IN SOA ns10.openforce.com. noc.openforce.com. 1182932271 1800 900 3600 900 openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns10.openforce.com. openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns24.ifo.net. ns10.openforce.com. 3600 IN A 81.223.107.117 ns24.ifo.net. 7200 IN A 217.29.159.135;; Received 148 bytes from 217.29.159.135#53(217.29.159.135) in 58 ms
~ $ dig @ns34.ifo.net openforce.com SOA openforce.com. 3600 IN SOA ns10.openforce.com. noc.openforce.com. 1182932271 1800 900 3600 900 openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns10.openforce.com. openforce.com. 3600 IN NS ns24.ifo.net. ns10.openforce.com. 3600 IN A 81.223.107.117 ns24.ifo.net. 7200 IN A 217.29.159.135;; Received 148 bytes from 217.29.159.131#53(217.29.159.131) in 37 ms
The com Nameservers say this:
providing only the first output here since all report the same
~ $ for i in $(dig com NS|egrep '^com\.'|awk '{print $5}');do dig @$i
openforce.com NS;done openforce.com. 172800 IN NS ns10.openforce.com. openforce.com. 172800 IN NS ns34.ifo.net. ns10.openforce.com. 172800 IN A 62.99.149.110 ns34.ifo.net. 172800 IN A 217.29.159.131;; Received 108 bytes from 192.52.178.30#53(192.52.178.30) in 53 ms
thanks
martin
On 6/27/07, Till Wimmer <t.wimmer@tonarchiv.ch> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> actually this is not a debian related question...
>
> If you post your zone file and tell us what version, ip etc. your server
> is using, we could help you a little bit more...
>
> bye
> Till
>
> Martin Marcher wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > i needed to update our nameserver, now maintaining my own nameserver
> > is fine but I don't know what procedure to follow if i need to point
> > our ns a new IP. Having blindly trusted our dns provider to tell me
> > about eventualities i just told them to update the ip address for the
> > nameserver and tell me about possible problems. what can i say he told
> > me everything is fine and now dnsreport.com tells me about mismatched
> > glue for our nameservers
> >
> > http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?%26domain%3Dopenforce.com
> >
> > Do I just have to wait for the parent servers until propagation is
> > finished or did something go horribly wrong?
> >
> > thanks
> > martin
> >
> >
>
>
-- Martin Marcher martin.marcher@gmail.com http://www.mycorners.comhttps://www.xing.com/profile/Martin_Marcherhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/martinmarcherhttp://www.studivz.net/profile.php?ids=9f83ea8c5996b8echttp://www.amazon.de/gp/registry/wishlist/3KDAGCL2NKOIM/ref=reg_hu-wl_goto-registry/302-4432803-5146435?ie=UTF8&sort=date-added -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgReceived on Wed Jun 27 14:43:30 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 27 2007 - 14:50:02 EDT
|
Contact Us Legal Notices Order Services Online Pantek Home Privacy Policy IT news Site Map Pantek Library |