Re: Firefox \ Iceweasel Differences?
On Jul 31, 2007, at 7:28 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Why not just code to the standard instead of to a browser, do your > testing in an ACID compliant browser like Konqueror (instead of a > browser that can't render to the standard), and then call it good? If > it looks good there, it'll look just as good in any browser that > actually complies with the standard or does a reasonably good job > faking it?
In this vein, I've found a *lot* of strange incompatibilities between
browsers go away if I use a proper DOCTYPE header and check my HTML
with W3C's validator. It seems without a document type each browser
renders according to its particular best guess, which isn't very
dependable, and lot of what I thought were browser bugs turned out to
be me not following the standard. ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Received on Wed Aug 1 13:51:04 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Thu Aug 09 2007 - 18:37:55 EDT
|