|
|
| Applications |
| Mailing Lists |
| Miscellaneous |
| Operating Systems |
| Programming |
Re: Version number of Lenny
From: Gyorgy Abraham <hangcsapda(at)gmail.com>
Date: Tue Aug 21 2007 - 04:16:22 EDT
>
> Etch had a lot of major changes. Sarge had kernel 2.4 or 2.6, Etch
> had just 2.6. Sarge had Xfree86 (X11R6), Etch had Xorg (X11R7).
> Sarge had GCC 3.x while Etch uses 4.x. Etch has D-bus 1.0.x,
> Sarge had 0.23 or some such. Oh, and Etch has the new installer.
>
> Anyway, the changes between Etch and Lenny will not be nearly
> as large as the changes between Sarge and Etch. Lenny will still
> have GCC 4.x, Xorg 7.x, kernel 2.6.x, etc (minor version updates).
>
>
> Cheers,
> Kelly
>
>
Date: Tue Aug 21 2007 - 04:16:22 EDT
Kelly Clowers írta:
> On 8/20/07, Masatran, R. Deepak <masatran@research.iiit.ac.in> wrote:
>> Why is it that Etch incremented the major version number (3.1 to 4.0), but >> Lenny will increment only the minor version number (4.0 to 4.1)?
>
> Etch had a lot of major changes. Sarge had kernel 2.4 or 2.6, Etch
> had just 2.6. Sarge had Xfree86 (X11R6), Etch had Xorg (X11R7).
> Sarge had GCC 3.x while Etch uses 4.x. Etch has D-bus 1.0.x,
> Sarge had 0.23 or some such. Oh, and Etch has the new installer.
>
> Anyway, the changes between Etch and Lenny will not be nearly
> as large as the changes between Sarge and Etch. Lenny will still
> have GCC 4.x, Xorg 7.x, kernel 2.6.x, etc (minor version updates).
>
>
> Cheers,
> Kelly
>
>
And maybe amd64 support is important.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgReceived on Tue Aug 21 04:17:14 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 07 2007 - 02:35:28 EDT
|
Contact Us Legal Notices Order Services Online Pantek Home Privacy Policy IT news Site Map Pantek Library |