Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

Re: (etch) Using aptitude after using dselect - any issues?

From: Daniel Burrows <dburrows(at)debian.org>
Date: Mon Oct 08 2007 - 10:23:48 EDT


On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:51:05AM -0400, Chris Bannister <mockingbird@earthlight.co.nz> was heard to say:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:19:33AM +0200, Tobias Nissen wrote:
> > Hi Martin!
> >
> > Martin Waller wrote:
> > > Is it safe to switch to using aptititude as my package manager after
> > > having used dselect up to now?
> >
> > Yes, it is safe. dselect and aptitude use different databases.
>
> dpkg seems to rely on dselect for some reason:
>
> root@box:~# dpkg --purge dselect
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of dselect:
> dpkg depends on dselect.
> [..]

  dpkg depends on dselect because dselect used to be part of the dpkg package. When dselect was split out, the dpkg maintainers wanted to ensure that no-one lost dselect during an upgrade, so dpkg depended (in fact, pre-depended IIRC) on dselect for some time. There's no technical reason to have dselect around.

  That said, the dependency went away sometime between sarge and etch, although a quick scan of the changelog doesn't tell me when.

  Daniel

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Received on Mon Oct 8 10:31:00 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 25 2008 - 09:39:21 EST


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library