Re: (etch) Using aptitude after using dselect - any issues?

Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:51:05AM -0400, Chris Bannister <mockingbird@earthlight.co.nz> was heard to say:
> > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:19:33AM +0200, Tobias Nissen wrote:
> > > Hi Martin!
> > >
> > > Martin Waller wrote:
> > > > Is it safe to switch to using aptititude as my package manager after
> > > > having used dselect up to now?
> > >
> > > Yes, it is safe. dselect and aptitude use different databases.
> >
> > dpkg seems to rely on dselect for some reason:
> >
> > root@box:~# dpkg --purge dselect
> > dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of dselect:
> > dpkg depends on dselect.
> > [..]
>
> dpkg depends on dselect because dselect used to be part of the dpkg
> package. When dselect was split out, the dpkg maintainers wanted to
> ensure that no-one lost dselect during an upgrade, so dpkg depended (in
> fact, pre-depended IIRC) on dselect for some time. There's no technical
> reason to have dselect around.
>
> That said, the dependency went away sometime between sarge and etch,
> although a quick scan of the changelog doesn't tell me when.

I just looked and dselect still shows 'Priority: required' in etch even though nothing is listed as depending on it. Maybe that should be changed.

-- 
Carl Johnson		carlj@peak.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org