Re: su doesn't work "Authentication [ "Damon L. Chesser" <damon@damtek.co ]
Re: Blu Ray LG GGW-H20L crashes Linu [ Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> ]
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:25:28 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?S3Vuc3p0IMOBcnDDoWQ=?= <arpad@deverto.hu>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Create custom package
Message-ID: <47A1DA58.6050806@deverto.hu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi!
I want to create an "alternate" package for libmysqlclient15off. It
means I tried to create an dvrt-libmysqlclient15off package which can
replace the libmysqlclient15off package in the dependency checks. The
control files relevant part is now:
Package: dvrt-libmysqlclient15off
Section: libs
Architecture: any
Depends: dvrt-mysql-common (>= ${Source-Version}), ${shlibs:Depends}
Conflicts: libmysqlclient15, libmysqlclient15off
Replaces: libmysqlclient15, libmysqlclient15off
Description: mysql database client library
MySQL is a fast, stable and true multi-user, multi-threaded SQL database
server. SQL (Structured Query Language) is the most popular database query
language in the world. The main goals of MySQL are speed, robustness and
ease of use.
.
This package includes the client library.
Provides: libmysqlclient15off
But when I try to install a package which depends on
libmysqlclient15off, I get error like this:
server01-vz16:~/packages/mysql/5.0/work/mysql-dfsg-5.0-5.0.32# apt-get
install libdbd-mysql-perl dvrt-libmysqlclient15off
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libdbd-mysql-perl: Depends: libmysqlclient15off (>= 5.0.24-2)
E: Broken packages
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks for any help.
Arpad Kunszt
Deverto Systems Ltd.
PS: Sorry for my English.
PPS: Changing just the version number of the package and leave it's name
is not an option now.
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:57:17 -0800
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Blu Ray LG GGW-H20L crashes Linux [Solved]
Message-ID: <20080131145717.GN4643@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cs5saTBZh7UZl2eX"
Content-Disposition: inline
--cs5saTBZh7UZl2eX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:37:03AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> On 01/31/08 01:38, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 20:13 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> The only solution is to take out that excess RAM and send it to me!
> > Sorry,.. I've already threw it away ;-P
>=20
> Are you old enough to remember when 256KB cost a thousand dollars?
yep, well maybe not $1000, but a lot anyway. and that was so much ram
how could you ever use it all... I mean that was more than a third of
640K and no way did anybody need more than that,
>=20
> And now we joke about throwing away a GB...
It's wierd, but I still feel like buying memory is splurging. I've got
a couple machines that could really use another 256-512MB and I can't
quite stomach buying it. I know, I know, as soon as I look at the
prices, I'll realise it's dirt cheap and wonder why I didn't do it
months ago... just a mental block.
A
--cs5saTBZh7UZl2eX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHoeHMaIeIEqwil4YRAlQFAKClRlEO2Zap7iA9lkVaHZzP8b/bvgCgkjx4
3izqoru/o8j62N88NaNS0zk=
=PFdg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cs5saTBZh7UZl2eX--
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:56:10 +0100
From: "Dan H." <dunno@stoptrick.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Setting up Debian on a mobile disk
Message-ID: <20080131145610.GB10032@stoptrick.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
--i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hello,
like the subject says, I want to set up a Debian system on a bootable
external USB hard disk to use with a (normally) Windows laptop. Of course I
could just pop in a netinstall CD on the target computer and do the normal installation
process. However, I have a couple of full-featured Debian PCs and wondered
if I couldn't somehow use them (and their up-to-date package cache) to
accomplish this much quicker. Mind you, I don't need or want a clone of an
existing system; essentially I just want to circumvent the clumsy boot-CD
process and the slow package download.
I can hook up the laptop to a local network with a Debian box. Is it
possible to set up that box as a package repository?
Thanks,
--D.
--i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHoeGKGdM4FB223AcRAv8UAJ9AoHCSvmd8RxNGNXTU+VwGGNuetwCfeK3b
Tl4bd5JzisxtNhzQsdoBubk=
=O45X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ--
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:47:32 -0600
From: Kent West <westk@acu.edu>
To: debian users <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: smbmount issues (related to CIFS?)
Message-ID: <47A1ED94.4040904@acu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Michael Marsh wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 12:14 AM, Kent West <westk@acu.edu> wrote:
>
>> On the machine having the 2.6.22 kernel, I can not. Here's the error:
>>
>> westk@westek:~$ smbmount //faculty/web netShares/web/
>> Password:
>> mount error 2 = No such file or directory
>> Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)
>>
>>
>> This used to work on this box, until a few months (weeks?) ago (I'm just
>> now getting around to working on the problem).
>>
>> Both boxes run Sid.
>>
>
> If you have a "helpful" ISP, such as Verizon, then it's going to
> resolve "faculty" to its search service, which isn't what you want.
> With smbfs, you could specify
>
> name resolve order = lmhosts wins bcast
>
> to avoid the DNS lookup. With cifs, you can't, since it doesn't yet
> respect smb.conf. However, you can install winbind and edit
> /etc/nsswitch.conf, setting the hosts spec to:
>
> hosts: files wins dns
>
> That worked like a charm for me, with thanks to Steve Langasek (vorlon).
>
>
Changing /etc/samba/smb.conf to:
; name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
name resolve order = lmhosts wins bcast
and restarting /etc/init.d/samba made no difference.
"aptitude install winbind" and changing /etc/nsswitch.conf to:
hosts: files wins dns mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] mdns4
#hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mdns4
made no difference.
When trying to smbmount "faculty", it doesn't matter if I use "faculty"
or "faculty.acu.edu" or the IP address; same failure each time.
westk@westek:~$ smbclient -L faculty
Password:
Domain=[ACU-ACADEMIC] OS=[SunOS 5.9 sun4u] Server=[LAN Manager 2.1]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
home Disk Home Directories
shared Disk Shared Directories
dept Disk Departmental Directories
web Disk Home Directories
classes Disk Classes Directory
_acu_temp_drax$ Disk Place Holder Directory
print$ Disk print$
IPC$ IPC Remote IPC
westk Disk default attach point
Domain=[ACU-ACADEMIC] OS=[SunOS 5.9 sun4u] Server=[LAN Manager 2.1]
Server Comment
--------- -------
ACADPDC
CLASSES Classes
FACULTY Syntax LMserver
MYACU Syntax LMserver
PROFDEV Syntax LMserver
STUDENT Syntax LMserver
Workgroup Master
--------- -------
ACU PHOEBE
ACU-ACADEMIC ACADPDC
MSHOME DESAXL-P
TEST TESTDC2
WORKGROUP ACU-TESTLAB-LB1
I'm using my username (westk) which is the same on both Debian boxes and
on the ACU-ACADEMIC WindowsNT/ActiveDirectory domain. I can smbmount a
share that's on a Windows Server 2003 box:
westk@westek:~$ smbclient -L luke
Password:
Domain=[ACU] OS=[Windows Server 2003 3790 Service Pack 2]
Server=[Windows Server 2003 5.2]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
J$ Disk Default share
print$ Disk Printer Drivers
CIO Cabinet Disk
<etc etc etc>
westk@westek:~$ smbmount //luke/pc_apps mnt
Password:
westk@westek:~$ ls mnt
Acrobat dynamic.ini New
Folder Sophos.lnk
<etc etc etc>
--
Kent
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:47:20 +0100
From: "Dan H." <dunno@stoptrick.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Setting up Debian on a mobile disk
Message-ID: <20080131154720.GA3431@stoptrick.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi"
Content-Disposition: inline
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:56:10PM +0100, Dan H. wrote:
> like the subject says, I want to set up a Debian system on a bootable
> external USB hard disk
Followup: I've discovered debootstrap and have used it to set up a system on
that mobile disk. I chrooted to that disk (using the procedure from the
debootstrap manpage) and installed a few additional packages with aptitude.
That sort of worked (there were gazillions of error messages about Perl
falling back to the C locale or some such stuff -- don't know if that
matters). Also what puzzled me was that the chroot system immediately wanted
to upgrade many packages -- I mean, all packages had come fresh off the same
server minutes ago.
Anyway, I then rebooted the PC and tried to boot from the USB disk but that
didn't work.
Then, back in my normal system, I mounted the USB disk and discovered that
it had neither a kernel nor a bootloader installed (that ain't much of the=
=20
So to fix that I wanted to chroot into my mounted USB disk again but was
rebuffed:
chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': Permission denied
WTF? There were no changes to that disk since chroot worked just before the
reboot. I also did the "mount proc" spiel, whatever that's for.
Thanks,
--D.
=20
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHoe2IGdM4FB223AcRAhnRAJ92He/CxOuG/QmqODMPDzNPCvaapACdG0AW
q3Z/oW7Z/EWAVEGOESsQaCU=
=SIGg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:50:57 -0600
From: Kent West <westk@acu.edu>
To: debian users <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: smbmount issues (related to CIFS?)
Message-ID: <47A1EE61.6030203@acu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Kent West wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 12:14 AM, Kent West <westk@acu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On the machine having the 2.6.22 kernel, I can not. Here's the error:
>>>
>>> westk@westek:~$ smbmount //faculty/web netShares/web/
>>> Password:
>>> mount error 2 = No such file or directory
>>> Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)
>>>
>
> When trying to smbmount "faculty", it doesn't matter if I use
> "faculty" or "faculty.acu.edu" or the IP address; same failure each time.
>
> westk@westek:~$ smbclient -L faculty
> Password:
> Domain=[ACU-ACADEMIC] OS=[SunOS 5.9 sun4u] Server=[LAN Manager 2.1]
>
> Sharename Type Comment
> --------- ---- -------
> home Disk Home Directories
> shared Disk Shared Directories
> dept Disk Departmental Directories
> web Disk Home Directories
> <etc etc etc>
>
> I'm using my username (westk) which is the same on both Debian boxes
> and on the ACU-ACADEMIC WindowsNT/ActiveDirectory domain. I can
> smbmount a share that's on a Windows Server 2003 box:
>
> westk@westek:~$ smbclient -L luke
> Password:
> Domain=[ACU] OS=[Windows Server 2003 3790 Service Pack 2]
> Server=[Windows Server 2003 5.2]
>
> Sharename Type Comment
> --------- ---- -------
> J$ Disk Default share
> print$ Disk Printer Drivers
> CIO Cabinet Disk
> <etc etc etc>
>
>
> westk@westek:~$ smbmount //luke/pc_apps mnt
> Password:
> westk@westek:~$ ls mnt
> Acrobat dynamic.ini New
> Folder Sophos.lnk
> <etc etc etc>
>
But interestingly enough, when I try to un-mount this share, it seems to
unmount (the files are no longer viewable), but the "mount" command
still lists it as being mounted:
westk@westek:~$ smbumount mnt
westk@westek:~$ mount
<blah blah blah>
dev/hda2 on /home/westk/VMs type ext3 (rw)
//luke/pc_apps on /home/westk/netShares/pc_apps type cifs
(rw,mand,nosuid,nodev,user=westk)
//luke/pc_apps on /home/westk/mnt type cifs
(rw,mand,nosuid,nodev,user=westk)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:54:34 -0700
From: "wauhugo@yahoo.com" <wauhugo@yahoo.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: kernel versus broadcom wlan
Message-ID: <47A1FD4A.2010306@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Just in case, that this information could be helpful. Here is the PCI
address of Broadcom WLAN interface:
# lspci
03:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM94311MCG wlan
mini-PCI (rev 02)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From /var/log/dmesg :
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LK1E] enabled at IRQ 17
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:03:00.0[A] -> Link [LK1E] -> GSI 17 (level,
high) -> IRQ 17
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:03:00.0 to 64
WARNING: at drivers/ssb/main.c:883 ssb_tmslow_reject_bitmask()
Pid: 1459, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8834a7cd>] :ssb:ssb_tmslow_reject_bitmask+0x4a/0x53
[<ffffffff8834b03d>] :ssb:ssb_device_is_enabled+0xf/0x3b
[<ffffffff8834d1ba>] :ssb:ssb_pcicore_init+0x19/0x4a
[<ffffffff8834a544>] :ssb:ssb_attach_queued_buses+0x9a/0x294
[<ffffffff8834bce0>] :ssb:ssb_pci_get_invariants+0x0/0x2b7
[<ffffffff8834ab53>] :ssb:ssb_bus_register+0x13d/0x1ac
[<ffffffff8834ac72>] :ssb:ssb_bus_pcibus_register+0x2a/0x4b
[<ffffffff8834c5a1>] :ssb:ssb_pcihost_probe+0x6f/0x9e
[<ffffffff8031d360>] pci_device_probe+0xd1/0x138
[<ffffffff80379be6>] driver_probe_device+0xf7/0x174
[<ffffffff80379d05>] __driver_attach+0x0/0x92
[<ffffffff80379d5f>] __driver_attach+0x5a/0x92
[<ffffffff80378fd2>] bus_for_each_dev+0x43/0x6e
[<ffffffff80379352>] bus_add_driver+0x77/0x1be
[<ffffffff8031d539>] __pci_register_driver+0x58/0x8a
[<ffffffff880ef045>] :ssb:ssb_modinit+0x45/0x5d
[<ffffffff80256ae8>] sys_init_module+0x16e3/0x1821
[<ffffffff8020be2e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
ssb: Sonics Silicon Backplane found on PCI device 0000:03:00.0
----------------------------------------------------------------
And "ssb" gives out warning and trace at this pci-address.
Hugo
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:36:03 -0800 (PST)
From: paul <google@pcwehle.de>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: su doesn't work "Authentication failure"
Message-ID: <ca034311-fd88-425e-98ca-0fca5f5beb34@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello,
on my debian etch machine 'su' doesn't work if a password is needed.
It is possible to do 'su someuser' from root but it's not possible to
get back to root then using just 'su' or change from a normal user to
another user account.
myserver:/tmp$ su
Password:
su: Authentication failure
Sorry.
auth.log says:
Jan 31 15:44:18 myserver su[27729]: (pam_unix) authentication failure;
logname= uid=1000 euid=1000 tty=pts/4 ruser=myuser rhost= user=root
Jan 31 15:44:20 myserver su[27729]: pam_authenticate: Authentication
failure
Jan 31 15:44:20 myserver su[27729]: FAILED su for root by myuser
Jan 31 15:44:20 myserver su[27729]: - pts/4 myuser:root
I suspect sth. in with the pam module got broken.
Any suggestions how to go on?
thx, paul
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:49:35 -0500
From: "Lily Zey" <lilyzey@gmail.com>
To: "Debian-user" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: your web site
Message-ID: <85103129.20080131104935@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear:Debian-user
You're losing online business to your competitors because you are not positioned high enough on the
major search directories. We would like to give a free site analysis to show you what better placement
could mean for your company. Our no-cost review includes information on your competitors. Email us
today at lilyzey@gmail.com. Our free consultation is a no-hassle review of your online business.
Sincerely,
Rocket Media
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:52:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Francesco Pietra <chiendarret@yahoo.com>
To: debian-users <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Fwd: Total vs per-cpu memory
Message-ID: <706327.33252.qm@web57609.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry for the mistake, although otherwise clear from the context: 16GB to=
tal is
correct as there are 4GB per cpu.
francesco
--- Francesco Pietra <chiendarret@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:39:43 -0800 (PST)
> From: Francesco Pietra <chiendarret@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Total vs per-cpu memory
> To: debian64 <debian-amd64@lists.debian.org>
>=20
> This question is related to problems in running a docking computation. =
With
> big
> cases, RAM proves insufficient, resulting in immediate "segmentation fa=
ult",
> so
> that "top" cannot inform. Though, from the code it is clear that memory=
is
> insufficient to rotate the object in a non-parallelized part of the pro=
gram.
> Smaller objects do not give problems.
>=20
> My question is: with Tyan S2895 Thunder K8WE, two dual opterons and 1GB=
RAM
> per
> cpu (amd64 etch), are the 16GB available to the single cpu involved in =
the
> computation, or are 4GB available?=20
>=20
> Memory was set with shmmax:
>=20
> kernel.shmmax =3D 16000000000
> kernel.shmall =3D 16000000000
>=20
> sysctl -p
>=20
> Thanks
> francesco pietra
>=20
>=20
> =20
>
_________________________________________________________________________=
___________
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.=20
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>=20
___________________________________________________________________=
_________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.=20
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:20:43 -0500
From: "Damon L. Chesser" <damon@damtek.com>
To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: su doesn't work "Authentication failure"
Message-ID: <47A1F55B.9020804@damtek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
paul wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on my debian etch machine 'su' doesn't work if a password is needed.
> It is possible to do 'su someuser' from root but it's not possible to
> get back to root then using just 'su' or change from a normal user to
> another user account.
>
>
> myserver:/tmp$ su
> Password:
> su: Authentication failure
> Sorry.
>
> auth.log says:
> Jan 31 15:44:18 myserver su[27729]: (pam_unix) authentication failure;
> logname= uid=1000 euid=1000 tty=pts/4 ruser=myuser rhost= user=root
> Jan 31 15:44:20 myserver su[27729]: pam_authenticate: Authentication
> failure
> Jan 31 15:44:20 myserver su[27729]: FAILED su for root by myuser
> Jan 31 15:44:20 myserver su[27729]: - pts/4 myuser:root
>
> I suspect sth. in with the pam module got broken.
>
> Any suggestions how to go on?
>
> thx, paul
>
>
>
Paul,
I had the same issue. I fixed it by doing two things:
1. I used sudo to su to root "sudo su"
2. As I had a BadCRC reported on a HD, I had to re-configure my
hardware setup and re-install.
The first is a bandaide. The 2nd is a shotgun to kill a bug. Both
worked. The source was never found.
HTH
--
Damon L. Chesser
damon@damtek.com
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:29:55 -0600
From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Blu Ray LG GGW-H20L crashes Linux [Solved]
Message-ID: <47A1F783.2090509@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/08 08:57, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:37:03AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 01/31/08 01:38, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 20:13 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>> The only solution is to take out that excess RAM and send it to me!
>>> Sorry,.. I've already threw it away ;-P
>> Are you old enough to remember when 256KB cost a thousand dollars?
>
> yep, well maybe not $1000, but a lot anyway. and that was so much ram
> how could you ever use it all... I mean that was more than a third of
> 640K and no way did anybody need more than that,
Text-mode DOS apps just didn't *need* much RAM.
>> And now we joke about throwing away a GB...
>
> It's wierd, but I still feel like buying memory is splurging. I've got
> a couple machines that could really use another 256-512MB and I can't
> quite stomach buying it. I know, I know, as soon as I look at the
> prices, I'll realise it's dirt cheap and wonder why I didn't do it
> months ago... just a mental block.
Ingrained habit. I can still remember buying a 250MB HDD for $300.
Now you get 4000x more capacity for the same price.
My desktop has more memory than some of our old still-in-service
workhorse Alphas. Of course, the less-old Alphas still have 16-32GB
RAM.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
PETA - People Eating Tasty Animals
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHofeDS9HxQb37XmcRAiMgAKCJh6qevy5YxMkS5njR1sQsn2Y4CQCdFg5w
moV5XswuuILZYlgZT+p8IBI=
=P8hk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
End of debian-user-digest Digest V2008 Issue #240
*************************************************
Received on Thu Jan 31 11:39:00 2008