Hosting Provided By

linux-ipsec: AH-HMAC-SHA1-96 working, is back compat necessary?

This message: [ Message body ] [ More options ]

Related messages: [ Next message ] [ Previous message ] [ Replies ]

From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(at)conscoop.ottawa.on.ca>
Date: Wed Apr 08 1998 - 10:29:10 EDT

Subject says it all...on to work on ESP_DES_HMAC_MD5_96.

The OpenBSD IPSEC implementation provides compatibility with the older set of ipsec specs (I assume RFC182[5-9]). Is this out of convenience, necessity, or courtesy?

How useful/necessary is it for KLIPS to provide backwards compatibility with that set of standards?

Slainte Mhath, rgb Received on Wed Apr 8 10:13:43 1998

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Guy Briggs: "linux-ipsec: ESP_DES_HMAC_MD5_96 working, on to Device busy errors"
Previous message: Peter Van Renterghem: "Re: linux-ipsec: Where is Hugh Daniel?"
Reply: Rodney Thayer: "linux-ipsec: AH-HMAC-SHA1-96 working, is back compat necessary?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 12:59:10 EDT