Re: linux-ipsec: Re: IPSec: Fragmentation in Linux 2.0.xx IP stack

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox)
Subject: Re: linux-ipsec: Re: IPSec: Fragmentation in Linux 2.0.xx IP stack Cc: hugh@toad.com, linux-ipsec@clinet.fi, ji@research.att.com Date: 04/28/98, 19:19:05

In message <m0yUJRF-000aNhC@the-village.bc.nu>, Alan Cox writes:
>Umm. Regents of UCB are 'non negotiable' - they see the credit as something

I meant make it use packages that aren't BSD-specific, in other architectures.

>I think you guys are the people to decide that not me.

So then, what's the procedure to get a piece of code "stamped approved", and who's the "authority" ?

>Unreasonable requirements get unreasonable answers. I see no reason to GPL

Is that a word-trick ? :-)

• -Angelos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related lists.freeswan.org Links 1998-fall 1998-spring 1998-summer 1998-winter 1999-winter announce briefs bugs design freeswan-list hipsec ietf-sectest users users-admin Request more information about Pantek

iQCVAwUBNUZj6b0pBjh2h1kFAQFjsQP+N88ZIOsiw6xmQO6/Sy5uCeEYZ4KNLUjZ qa7tNyVaPCNbjf7Cj9zOWKeeQqVAyZHnk8dKg4MDiQ7enhvw74riMD6+7p3hoqxG ExX9TaaJD/uZ2Jn4hcg1zOhXcHBv2brzGXTC5y0fFQHXDpLkDHwO660yvHOigd52 asSV4Xf8wb8=
=MUe0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Received on Tue Apr 28 20:02:32 1998