Re: linux-ipsec: Second major test of Pluto from the 0.8 release

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Yeiks! There is NO IPSEC really running on the north SG and pluto

This is reasonable logic.

> > These two should have the same broadcast address. (This is now noted

It should be set when tncfg and ifconfig are called to set up the ipsec0 I/F with a physical I/F. This may be something that should be set up by tncfg...hmmm, I have an ifconfig after tncfg which sets up the virtual I/F with the same address as the physical I/F, but no other parameters, since the defaults for a class C are correct. This command maybe should be changed from:

        ifconfig ipsec0 $gw1

to:

        ifconfig ipsec0 $gw1 broadcast $gw1bcast netmask $gw1nmask

but this will require a value set...hmmm maybe we can test for these:

	ifconfig $if $gw1
	[ $gw1bcast -eq "" ] || ifconfig $if broadcast $gw1bcast
	[ $gw1nmask -eq "" ] || ifconfig $if netmask $gw1nmask


> 		||ugh Daniel



	Slainte Mhath, rgb

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related lists.freeswan.org Links 1998-fall 1998-spring 1998-summer 1998-winter 1999-winter announce briefs bugs design freeswan-list hipsec ietf-sectest users users-admin Request more information about Pantek

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNWwur9+sBuIhFagtAQE4igP7BKknLSDsbT0USmDCW5sGvmQ1DHfh3va6 OvGHSmUYTJ3NVAPeM+5nWR1gd9U7tdq/FnbHq4GwMJq3QXO8jGCYf14WM7pDnflS QRmgPxneXAlp0oCpHZ2J8nMuFapxwRkZkKmALnTbvl5hnNGh6y38i3xEjRPNkL0q cNYgaoYR1uA=
=Qhwj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Received on Wed May 27 11:18:12 1998