|
|||||||||||
|
Re: linux-ipsec: At last, it works...not.
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(at)conscoop.ottawa.on.ca>
Date: Tue Jun 09 1998 - 12:56:26 EDT
I have just changed a couple of things that should fix it. > The interesting thing is that the scripts that set up the link are
This is a problem I am having here, working on it. It seems to be kernel version independant since I am using 2.0.33 to 2.0.33. I broke things when I separated the keys at the util level. > I will append the output of my ipsec_systat program (that it seems
Your ipsec0 interface has a completely bogus IP/broadcast address. My, you are getting creative. > Oh, the MANUAL flag is being set again, progress! Thanks for this
I don't think I actively fixed it. I suspect you either got a misaligned snapshot or I cleaned up some other stuff and added debugging to prevent and detect it. Glad it is cleared up. And the DoS bug? > ||ugh Daniel
> [east? or north? ...i forget]
> # cat /proc/version
if ipsec0 -> eth0, then they should have the same IP/bcast. Slainte Mhath, rgb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQCVAwUBNX1pON+sBuIhFagtAQG6ZQQAlK/qG0+vJ8Nnl27LARi11jnSy9yE6kBg
CkUjllvg0DBUxwvHfOa97b6bweOjeupBjavbGh+lnejnsqtEhRzzZV5jRuVnXBTQ
9hTsbZteGJQrtxiHosSHPJPhWqMbD5TrVl3eHi7iooIcf30+kO8pdiXOsRbaX28U
dWofeWYIg1w=
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 12:59:18 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||