Re: linux-ipsec: consistent command syntax

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- To: "William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson@greendragon.com> Subject: Re: linux-ipsec: consistent command syntax Cc: linux-ipsec@clinet.fi
Date: 07/10/98, 12:38:08

In message <7373.wsimpson@greendragon.com>, "William Allen Simpson" writes:
>
>Since filtering is a basic firewall facility, and is often associated in

ipf is not under our control; I don't want to have to change syntax if/when Darren does.

>Rename "ipsecadm" to "ips" or "ipsecure". Other tools should follow the

Why ? I think ipsecadm is a good name, and fairly descriptive of what it does. And I don't particularly like the ipf set of tools.

>Follow a very few positional parameters with -tagged optional

Why even bother with positional parameters ?

[snip]

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related lists.freeswan.org Links 1998-fall 1998-spring 1998-summer 1998-winter 1999-winter announce briefs bugs design freeswan-list hipsec ietf-sectest users users-admin Request more information about Pantek

So the rest is pretty much what we have already, just renamed. Is there a particular reason for doing all the renaming ? - -Angelos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBNaZDcb0pBjh2h1kFAQH+vgP+L509IBFvuGgVgN5YGOYfMDVFRQoxVpZH oNvQkprNHKUqV+RY3WWaAsEf17lIgSCP2nsVF2eWYwII7LkF0jQS/nUFTcSMcHKP Wc3GlaTPQHrerVKGB0MfvhbdiHRspB3lrQyMyj2uX0j9q7zkXFcUxhNr7hlJXR3Q HhZU7S0kkWE=
=N9yG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Received on Fri Jul 10 18:10:35 1998