Re: linux-ipsec: Latest snapshot and 2.0.35

Richard Guy Briggs enscribed thusly:

	:
	: - partial deletion to protect the irrelevant...
	:

> > 	On 5.1...  Both htonl and ntohl are suppose to be macros (I

> Again...I will see if some of the specifics are necessary....

> > Here is an example of those errors:

> > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.0.35/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strength-reduce -pip> e -m486 -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=586 -DMODULE -c -o ipsec_esp3desmd596.o ipsec_esp3desmd596.c>
> > In file included from /usr/include/unistd.h:148,
> > from ipsec_esp3desmd596.c:140:
> > /usr/include/gnu/types.h:75: warning: `__NFDBITS' redefined
> > /usr/src/linux-2.0.35/include/linux/posix_types.h:30: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> > /usr/include/gnu/types.h:77: warning: `__FDMASK' redefined
> > /usr/src/linux-2.0.35/include/linux/posix_types.h:42: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> > In file included from ipsec_esp3desmd596.c:140:
> > /usr/include/unistd.h:151: warning: redefinition of `ssize_t'
> > /usr/src/linux-2.0.35/include/linux/types.h:35: warning: `ssize_t' previously declared here

> Have you tried eliminating unistd.h?

        Sigh... Just did... The EPA is still clearing the area and checking for radiation.

        I ended up with a whole pile of incomplete types and stuff... So I guess that one is a "wrong answer". :-(

> > Might be related to the htonl/ntohl problem.

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related lists.freeswan.org Links 1998-fall 1998-spring 1998-summer 1998-winter 1999-winter announce briefs bugs design freeswan-list hipsec ietf-sectest users users-admin Request more information about Pantek

> I suspect not...but maybe. One is overdefinition, the other, under.

        So it appears now... I like to try for zero warnings and some of my engineers think I'm paranoid about it but... Maybe we give these warnings the "Scarlet O'Hara treatment" (I'll worry about that tommorrow).

        Mike

-- 
 Michael H. Warfield    |  (770) 985-6132   |  mhw@WittsEnd.com
  (The Mad Wizard)      |  (770) 925-8248   |  
http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9      |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471    |  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!