Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

Re[2]: linux-ipsec: broken for a few days...

From: <rob.glenn(at)nist.gov>
Date: Fri Aug 07 1998 - 11:19:17 EDT

"William Allen Simpson" <bsimpson@morningstar.com> wrote:
> > From: rob.glenn@nist.gov
> > ESP-NULL was initially requested by a particular vendor which wanted to

You missed your calling Bill, you should have been a lawyer. Yes, the idea of a null encryption cipher has been around for quite some time. But, the first point that people decided to treat the idea seriously with regard to IPsec was shortly before the March '98 Raleigh Interop when it appeared in the DOI spec. I believe (no, I don't have any hard evidence to support this) that Steve Kent had been pushing for this for quite some time. I apologize if I mislead anyone on this issue, it was not intentional.

>
> > Because of the controversy with AH, and the fact that ESP_NULL + <your

Given an authenticated SA, no one to date, has specified an attack that would succeed against NULL_ESP + auth_alg and not succeed against AH + auth_alg. If someone knows of such an attack, please bring it forward on the IETF IPsec WG list, or let me know, and I'll bring it up.

> However, it is mandatory to implement _only_ for ISAKMP, and not for
> anything else.

That is NOT a correct interpretation. Re-read Section 5. of the ESP draft.

begin-quote

Do you need help?X

   A compliant ESP implementation MUST support the following    mandatory-to-implement algorithms:

  • DES in CBC mode [MD97]
  • HMAC with MD5 [MG97a]
  • HMAC with SHA-1 [MG97b]
  • NULL Authentication algorithm
  • NULL Encryption algorithm

   Since ESP encryption and authentication are optional, support for the    2 "NULL" algorithms is required to maintain consistency with the way    these services are negotiated. NOTE that while authentication and    encryption can each be "NULL", they MUST NOT both be "NULL"

end-quote

> I recommend that anytime ESP NULL is negotiated, a warning message
> appear on the console and in syslog, the same as when any other
> catastrophic error occurs, like a PPP link dying.

Please tell, what evidence is this recommendation based on?

> WSimpson@UMich.edu
Received on Fri Aug 7 12:26:17 1998

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 12:59:26 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library