Re: linux-ipsec: An interesting happened to me on the way to the net...

> > So I wish to make two points here. First this is an argument for

I still like the idea of being able to write an SA as a single token (e.g. "esp1327@10.0.0.1"), but aside from that issue, I don't see any benefit in revising the syntax of spigrp. Spigrp's arguments are a *sequence* of SAs, and it is reasonable and proper to write them as a sequence.

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@spsystems.net
                                                     (henry@zoo.toronto.edu)