|
|||||||||||
|
Re: linux-ipsec: Phase II PFS
From: Hugh Redelmeier <hugh(at)trends.net>
Date: Mon Aug 31 1998 - 20:08:04 EDT
| From: Kai Martius <admin@imib.med.tu-dresden.de>
| Yesterday I managed to add PFS capability to Pluto's quick mode.
| However, they seem to support 768-DH-group only, or there
Right. The code you wrote used the Phase 1 group, not the negotiated one. | Adding this stuff, I came to your SPD-things in spdb.c/h.
This code was mostly already there. I've changed it anyway :-) | But at this point, the SPD-stuff is a
I hope that stuff will go away in the medium term. Pluto (or something) needs to support much more control and flexibility in the policy area. | Further, if Pluto is responder in quick mode, the incoming SA
I don't think that this was the case. It depends how things evolve. It is considerably smaller than when I took it over, so I'm content at the moment. | 2. "whack" has many options in the meantime, and they will become
This is another area that needs to evolve. There may be standards coming in this area (SNMP?). | From: Kai Martius <admin@imib.med.tu-dresden.de>
| By Hugh's (Daniel) request, I've included the PFS stuff into the
Thanks, that helped a lot. | Hugh (Redelmeier) should review it, if there are problems the
You'll see that this area is done differently now. | One problem I noticed today: I tried to use both
I added encrypt+authenticate support just after the snapshot you used. There is some problem between KLIPs and Pluto in this area. We hope to fix this soon. There is also a slicing-and-dicing bug with the keying material. | From: Kai Martius <admin@imib.med.tu-dresden.de>
| seems, that my attachment was rejected by the listserver, becasue it
This is a good way to transmit changes. Unfortunately, the diff got mangled by your mailer.
tar czvf pluto.tar `make distlist`
Thanks again,
Hugh Redelmeier
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 12:59:26 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||