Re: [Design] The 2.00 code fails a MAJOR user acceptance test

From: Michael Richardson <mcr(at)cyphermail.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Date: Sun Feb 16 2003 - 17:19:54 EST

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Hugh" == Hugh Daniel <hugh@road.toad.com> writes:

    Hugh> I then tar'ed up and removed ipsec.conf and the ipsec.d directory     Hugh> tree and then started up FreeS/WAN again. This time I can't talk   

  This is definitely a problem.
  It was supposed to be the case that if "private-or-clear" is empty that we consider it to have 0.0.0.0/0. This appears to have gotten lost when we switched from "OEself" to "private-or-clear"

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] 
mcr(at)sandelman.ottawa.on.ca 
http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPlAOiYqHRg3pndX9AQFPCAP/UFFYzQTZlrix8FSPAOPCpVTLa7phr5CS vboHFZxeNMc8GL/0tL2ZzjVlykYZBTP43zr7af0OpEcri/1ohhZY41cwPtqN2BPA b2/91AXWvvohc3sQ9JQECv4+ruXHNYCctZcYAzaufNjrRyPuS19pj+/zBDpBTtSn zJEoMEqAp6Y=
=VXYp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---

Design mailing list
Design@lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/design Received on Mon Feb 17 18:39:18 2003