Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel?

On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Ken Bantoft wrote:  

> I also see the major overhead being logging. Perhaps a "log only OE DNS

Og, it has been addressed in pre2, but the many OE changes there broke my current configuration (that used OE on ip aliases)  

Paul

-- 

> What would it take to get state-of-the-art IPsec into the mainline



A regime change in the USG...  :-0
               --- Richard Guy Briggs on design@lists.freeswan.org

_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design@lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/design