Mailing List Archive For design@freeswan.org Mar 2003 By Date

• Sat Mar 29 2003 - 16:01:42 EST
  • Re: [Design] samshotmar13l: pluto freeze Sam Sgro 
• Sat Mar 29 2003 - 16:35:45 EST
  • Re: [Design] samshotmar13l: pluto freeze Michael Richardson 
• Sat Mar 29 2003 - 13:44:33 EST
  • Re: [Design] road warrior and id field. Stephen J. Bevan 
• Fri Mar 28 2003 - 21:30:42 EST
  • Re: [Design] samshotmar13l: pluto freeze Sam Sgro 
• Sat Mar 29 2003 - 01:28:37 EST
  • Re: [Design] road warrior and id field. Kaustubh Kumbhalkar 
• Fri Mar 28 2003 - 22:18:11 EST
  • [Design] road warrior and id field. Stephen J. Bevan 
• Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:52:32 EST
  • Re: [Design] road warrior and id field. D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:11:02 EST
  • Re: [Design] samshot 2003mar13l fails to detect the CORRECT key in the DNS D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:54:24 EST
  • Re: [Design] road warrior and id field. D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Fri Mar 28 2003 - 05:23:01 EST
  • [Design] samshot 2003mar13l fails to detect the CORRECT key in the DNS Hugh Daniel 
• Thu Mar 27 2003 - 22:49:18 EST
  • [Design] samshotmar13l: pluto freeze Sam Sgro 
• Fri Mar 28 2003 - 18:17:30 EST
  • [Design] rfc3456 patch for freeswan Xiaoning Jiang 
• Fri Mar 28 2003 - 01:17:44 EST
  • [Design] road warrior and id field. Kaustubh Kumbhalkar 
• Thu Mar 27 2003 - 14:10:26 EST
  • Re: [Design] Complie a "modified" FreeSwan Michael Richardson 
• Thu Mar 27 2003 - 05:36:41 EST
  • [Design] Re: Complie a "modified" FreeSwan Andreas Steffen 
• Thu Mar 27 2003 - 01:03:37 EST
  • [Design] Complie a "modified" FreeSwan Calvin 
• Thu Mar 27 2003 - 01:57:54 EST
  • [Design] pluto: prioritizing connections and bare shunts D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Wed Mar 26 2003 - 17:00:28 EST
  • [Design] Super FreeSWAN 1.99.6 broken Igmar Palsenberg 
• Wed Mar 26 2003 - 12:10:38 EST
  • RE: [Design] ipsec6:road warrior-retransmission of MI3 and qI1. Gessler Gerhard 
• Wed Mar 26 2003 - 03:26:44 EST
  • Re: [Design] RSA keys Michael Richardson 
• Tue Mar 25 2003 - 23:15:20 EST
  • [Design] ipsec6:road warrior-retransmission of MI3 and qI1. Kaustubh Kumbhalkar 
• Tue Mar 25 2003 - 22:35:08 EST
  • [Design] ipsec auto --status: more description for bare shunts D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Tue Mar 25 2003 - 22:05:12 EST
  • [Design] ipsec.conf alsoflip= D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Mon Mar 24 2003 - 23:05:10 EST
  • Re: [Design] pluto broken in HEAD D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Sun Mar 23 2003 - 16:38:41 EST
  • [Design] pluto broken in HEAD D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Sat Mar 22 2003 - 20:29:47 EST
  • [Design] interfaces=%defaultroute D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:34:38 EST
  • [Design] ANNOUNCE: Super FreeS/WAN 1.99.6 Released Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Mar 21 2003 - 10:10:23 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? John S. Denker 
• Fri Mar 21 2003 - 07:36:10 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Paul Wouters 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:58:52 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Ken Bantoft 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:20:31 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Derek Atkins 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 18:46:41 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Derek Atkins 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:11:02 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Henry Spencer 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 18:34:04 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Jim Carter 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 18:01:11 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Jim Carter 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 17:53:43 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Paul Wouters 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 14:02:00 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Jim Carter 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 15:11:02 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? John S. Denker 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 05:19:19 EST
  • Re: [Design] RSA keys Roberto Barcellona 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 04:30:49 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Michael Richardson 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 04:15:07 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? John S. Denker 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 02:39:48 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Derek Atkins 
• Thu Mar 20 2003 - 02:16:10 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? John S. Denker 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 23:18:33 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Derek Atkins 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 20:42:31 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 14:15:08 EST
  • RE: [Design] OE in IPv6 Jeroen Massar 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:13:56 EST
  • [Design] OE in IPv6 Michael Richardson 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:12:49 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Derek Atkins 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:16:02 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Derek Atkins 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:44:47 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? John S. Denker 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 11:40:48 EST
  • 1DES (was Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel?) Henry Spencer 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 10:44:58 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Paul Wouters 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 10:33:12 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 05:27:48 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Paul Wouters 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 04:46:29 EST
  • [Design] UML failed.. pls help Calvin 
• Wed Mar 19 2003 - 19:36:47 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Sandy Harris 
• Tue Mar 18 2003 - 19:47:22 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Richard Guy Briggs 
• Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:39:06 EST
  • Re: [Design] Re: [Users] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack Richard Guy Briggs 
• Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:45:50 EST
  • [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Stephen J. Bevan 
• Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:16:46 EST
  • Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Paul Wouters 
• Tue Mar 18 2003 - 14:45:55 EST
  • Re: [Design] RSA keys Michael Richardson 
• Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:20:34 EST
  • [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? John S. Denker 
• Tue Mar 18 2003 - 08:52:22 EST
  • Re: [Design] RSA keys Andreas Steffen 
• Tue Mar 18 2003 - 07:55:33 EST
  • [Design] RSA keys Roberto Barcellona 
• Mon Mar 17 2003 - 03:14:44 EST
  • [Design] compiling with openssl Roberto Barcellona 
• Mon Mar 17 2003 - 19:00:26 EST
  • [Design] Karsten Blees/DCon is out of the office. blees(at)dcon.de 
• Mon Mar 17 2003 - 10:50:03 EST
  • [Design] IPSEC-FreeSwan and Radius Proxy Server Carlos Alejandro Aguero 
• Mon Mar 17 2003 - 01:44:41 EST
  • [Design] stop annoying pop up ads forever popupzapper_only_19.95(at)cs.com 
• Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:31:20 EST
  • [Design] How to build RedHat RPMs for 1.x FS (1.98/1.99) Sam Sgro 
• Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:41:32 EST
  • Re: [Design] mast(4) Sandy Harris 
• Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:42:20 EST
  • Re: [Design] ipsec can not start Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:08:13 EST
  • Re: [Design] mast(4) John S. Denker 
• Fri Mar 14 2003 - 06:29:27 EST
  • [Design] ipsec can not start Ð¤º£ÌΠ
• Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:11:34 EST
  • [Design] nit in headers D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:04:44 EST
  • Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Jim Carter 
• Thu Mar 13 2003 - 08:45:02 EST
  • Re: [Design] snapshot with new OE behavior Paul Wouters 
• Thu Mar 13 2003 - 06:50:27 EST
  • Re: [Design] a question about x509cert exchange Andreas Steffen 
• Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:29:14 EST
  • [Design] a question about x509cert yli 
• Thu Mar 13 2003 - 06:09:33 EST
  • [Design] snapshot with new OE behavior Sam Sgro 
• Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:40:47 EST
  • Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Sam Sgro 
• Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:59:29 EST
  • [Design] a question about x509cert exchange yli 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:03:54 EST
  • Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Michael Richardson 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:38:24 EST
  • Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:33:40 EST
  • Re: [Design] how to get differing DNS results Michael Richardson 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:57:36 EST
  • Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 16:08:58 EST
  • Re: [Design] pluto not responding -- possibly not re-entrant (updown) D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:52:01 EST
  • Re: [Design] pluto not responding -- possibly not re-entrant (updown) John S. Denker 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:56:46 EST
  • [Design] adding POLICY_* bits to Pluto [was Re: [Users] (no subject)] D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:50:15 EST
  • Re: [Design] mast(4) D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:39:22 EST
  • Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Paul Wouters 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:11:07 EST
  • Re: [Design] pluto not responding -- possibly not re-entrant (updown) D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:06:32 EST
  • Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Henry Spencer 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:39:19 EST
  • Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default John S. Denker 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:13:41 EST
  • Re: [Design] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack John S. Denker 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:24:01 EST
  • Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Paul Wouters 
• Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:06:47 EST
  • Re: [Design] how to get differing DNS results Paul Wouters 
• Tue Mar 11 2003 - 07:51:09 EST
  • Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Sam Sgro 
• Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:27:41 EST
  • Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:31:20 EST
  • [Design] Re: self-KEY check D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:41:08 EST
  • Re: [Design] plutostderrlog= Michael Richardson 
• Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:58:29 EST
  • [Design] self-KEY check Michael Richardson 
• Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:09:54 EST
  • [Design] how to get differing DNS results Michael Richardson 
• Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:32:38 EST
  • [Design] SNAT and OE Michael Richardson 
• Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:27:05 EST
  • Re: [Design] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack Nico Baggus 
• Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:42:30 EST
  • [Design] lookup of self-TXT/KEY Michael Richardson 
• Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:12:27 EST
  • [Design] Re: lookup of self-TXT/KEY D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Mon Mar 10 2003 - 02:06:28 EST
  • [Design] what will happen when to execute command line "ipsec auto --up "? yli 
• Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:32:37 EST
  • [Design] Re: [Users] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack Phillip.Watts(at)nlynx.com 
• Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:53:35 EST
  • [Design] Re: [Users] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack John S. Denker 
• Mon Mar 10 2003 - 08:12:27 EST
  • [Design] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack martin f krafft 
• Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:03:22 EST
  • [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Mon Mar 10 2003 - 03:45:26 EST
  • [Design] (no subject) Roberto Barcellona 
• Sun Mar 09 2003 - 20:24:50 EST
  • Re: [Design] [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems Stephen J. Bevan 
• Sun Mar 09 2003 - 20:22:43 EST
  • Re: [Design] plutostderrlog= D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:52:21 EST
  • [Design] plutostderrlog= Michael Richardson 
• Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:15:33 EST
  • Re: [Design] [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems John S. Denker 
• Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:23:32 EST
  • Re: [Design] [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems Stephen J. Bevan 
• Sun Mar 09 2003 - 10:57:10 EST
  • Re: [Design] [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems John S. Denker 
• Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:04:19 EST
  • [Design] [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems Stephen J. Bevan 
• Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:07:37 EST
  • [Design] ipsec auto --status now shows debug settings D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:27:01 EST
  • [Design] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems John S. Denker 
• Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:37:14 EST
  • Re: [Design] freeswan and sharp pda Ken Bantoft 
• Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:21:05 EST
  • [Design] freeswan and sharp pda Kaustubh Kumbhalkar 
• Sat Mar 08 2003 - 04:45:38 EST
  • [Design] tests not run by make check D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Fri Mar 07 2003 - 10:05:02 EST
  • Re: [Design] a review of make check output Michael Richardson 
• Fri Mar 07 2003 - 10:11:46 EST
  • [Design] ICMP processing relevant to IPSEC sampanna(at)codito.com 
• Thu Mar 06 2003 - 22:47:20 EST
  • [Design] a review of make check output D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Thu Mar 06 2003 - 19:31:51 EST
  • [Design] Re: best uml patch Michael Richardson 
• Thu Mar 06 2003 - 13:36:51 EST
  • [Design] Sam's concerns about 2.00 D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Thu Mar 06 2003 - 06:03:23 EST
  • [Design] How does pluto read ipsec.conf options? Roberto Barcellona 
• Thu Mar 06 2003 - 07:07:37 EST
  • Re: [Design] How does pluto read ipsec.conf options? Andreas Steffen 
• Thu Mar 06 2003 - 08:25:16 EST
  • [Design] interaction between confread and pluto Roberto Barcellona 
• Thu Mar 06 2003 - 03:50:19 EST
  • [Design] best uml patch D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Wed Mar 05 2003 - 18:05:57 EST
  • [Design] ipsec verify fix D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:44:58 EST
  • Re: [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Jim Carter 
• Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:46:16 EST
  • [Design] pluto now checks our sides DNS credentials for Opportunism D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:11:48 EST
  • [Design] Re: [Users] error status 139 Igmar Palsenberg 
• Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:54:01 EST
  • Re: [Design] Feature request: ipsec showhostkey --reverse Sam Sgro 
• Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:33:08 EST
  • Re: [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Claudia Schmeing 
• Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:08:10 EST
  • [Design] Feature request: ipsec showhostkey --reverse Claudia Schmeing 
• Wed Mar 05 2003 - 15:45:53 EST
  • [Design] Simplifying OE troubleshooting Claudia Schmeing 
• Wed Mar 05 2003 - 13:14:54 EST
  • [Design] Re: multiple ipsec.secrets entries Andreas Steffen 
• Wed Mar 05 2003 - 12:46:31 EST
  • [Design] Re: multiple ipsec.secrets entries Road Warrior 
• Tue Mar 04 2003 - 17:30:10 EST
  • [Design] ipsec.conf(5): finish updating to special keyingtries value %forever D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Tue Mar 04 2003 - 16:33:04 EST
  • Re: [Design] Making KLIPS 1 asynchronous to support H/W crypto Richard Guy Briggs 
• Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:19:20 EST
  • Re: [Design] Making KLIPS 1 asynchronous to support H/W crypto Richard Guy Briggs 
• Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:00:49 EST
  • Re: [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Michael Richardson 
• Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:46:59 EST
  • Re: [Design] Making KLIPS 1 asynchronous to support H/W crypto Michael Richardson 
• Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:26:20 EST
  • Re: [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Paul Wouters 
• Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:31:03 EST
  • Re: [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Michael Richardson 
• Mon Mar 03 2003 - 09:44:06 EST
  • [Design] Making KLIPS 1 asynchronous to support H/W crypto Arthur van Leeuwen 
• Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:17:54 EST
  • Re: [Design] Re: [Users] multiple ipsec.secrets entries Michael Richardson 
• Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:31:38 EST
  • Re: [Design] Re: [Users] multiple ipsec.secrets entries Andreas Steffen 
• Mon Mar 03 2003 - 07:46:18 EST
  • Re: [Design] Re: [Users] multiple ipsec.secrets entries Andreas Steffen 
• Mon Mar 03 2003 - 05:49:24 EST
  • [Design] FreeS/WAN graphical configurator (was: Making FreeS/WAN harder to use) John A. Sullivan III 
• Mon Mar 03 2003 - 04:32:32 EST
  • Re: [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Paul Wouters 
• Sun Mar 02 2003 - 20:25:27 EST
  • [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Sam Sgro 
• Sun Mar 02 2003 - 19:17:52 EST
  • Re: [Design] Re: [Users] multiple ipsec.secrets entries Michael Richardson 
• Sun Mar 02 2003 - 05:01:53 EST
  • [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. John S. Denker 
• Sat Mar 01 2003 - 22:58:17 EST
  • [Design] Re: Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. D. Hugh Redelmeier 
• Sat Mar 01 2003 - 21:41:47 EST
  • [Design] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Hugh Daniel 

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 12:59:58 EDT