Mailing List Archive For design@freeswan.org Mar 2003 By Thread

• Re: [Design] samshotmar13l: pluto freeze Sam Sgro (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 16:01:42 EST)
• Re: [Design] samshotmar13l: pluto freeze Michael Richardson (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 16:35:45 EST)
• Re: [Design] road warrior and id field. Stephen J. Bevan (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 13:44:33 EST)
• Re: [Design] samshotmar13l: pluto freeze Sam Sgro (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 21:30:42 EST)
• Re: [Design] road warrior and id field. Kaustubh Kumbhalkar (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 01:28:37 EST)
• [Design] road warrior and id field. Stephen J. Bevan (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 22:18:11 EST)
• Re: [Design] road warrior and id field. D. Hugh Redelmeier (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:52:32 EST)
• Re: [Design] samshot 2003mar13l fails to detect the CORRECT key in the DNS D. Hugh Redelmeier (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:11:02 EST)
• Re: [Design] road warrior and id field. D. Hugh Redelmeier (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:54:24 EST)
• [Design] samshot 2003mar13l fails to detect the CORRECT key in the DNS Hugh Daniel (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 05:23:01 EST)
• [Design] samshotmar13l: pluto freeze Sam Sgro (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 22:49:18 EST)
• [Design] rfc3456 patch for freeswan Xiaoning Jiang (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 18:17:30 EST)
• [Design] road warrior and id field. Kaustubh Kumbhalkar (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 01:17:44 EST)
• Re: [Design] Complie a "modified" FreeSwan Michael Richardson (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 14:10:26 EST)
• [Design] Re: Complie a "modified" FreeSwan Andreas Steffen (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 05:36:41 EST)
• [Design] Complie a "modified" FreeSwan Calvin (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 01:03:37 EST)
• [Design] pluto: prioritizing connections and bare shunts D. Hugh Redelmeier (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 01:57:54 EST)
• [Design] Super FreeSWAN 1.99.6 broken Igmar Palsenberg (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 17:00:28 EST)
• RE: [Design] ipsec6:road warrior-retransmission of MI3 and qI1. Gessler Gerhard (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 12:10:38 EST)
• Re: [Design] RSA keys Michael Richardson (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 03:26:44 EST)
• [Design] ipsec6:road warrior-retransmission of MI3 and qI1. Kaustubh Kumbhalkar (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 23:15:20 EST)
• [Design] ipsec auto --status: more description for bare shunts D. Hugh Redelmeier (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 22:35:08 EST)
• [Design] ipsec.conf alsoflip= D. Hugh Redelmeier (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 22:05:12 EST)
• Re: [Design] pluto broken in HEAD D. Hugh Redelmeier (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 23:05:10 EST)
• [Design] pluto broken in HEAD D. Hugh Redelmeier (Sun Mar 23 2003 - 16:38:41 EST)
• [Design] interfaces=%defaultroute D. Hugh Redelmeier (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 20:29:47 EST)
• [Design] ANNOUNCE: Super FreeS/WAN 1.99.6 Released Ken Bantoft (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:34:38 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? John S. Denker (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 10:10:23 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Paul Wouters (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 07:36:10 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Ken Bantoft (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:58:52 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Derek Atkins (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:20:31 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Derek Atkins (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 18:46:41 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Henry Spencer (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:11:02 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Jim Carter (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 18:34:04 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Jim Carter (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 18:01:11 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Paul Wouters (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 17:53:43 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Jim Carter (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 14:02:00 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? John S. Denker (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 15:11:02 EST)
• Re: [Design] RSA keys Roberto Barcellona (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 05:19:19 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Michael Richardson (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 04:30:49 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? John S. Denker (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 04:15:07 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Derek Atkins (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 02:39:48 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? John S. Denker (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 02:16:10 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Derek Atkins (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 23:18:33 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Ken Bantoft (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 20:42:31 EST)
• RE: [Design] OE in IPv6 Jeroen Massar (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 14:15:08 EST)
• [Design] OE in IPv6 Michael Richardson (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:13:56 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Derek Atkins (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:12:49 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Derek Atkins (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:16:02 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? John S. Denker (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:44:47 EST)
• 1DES (was Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel?) Henry Spencer (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 11:40:48 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Paul Wouters (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 10:44:58 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Ken Bantoft (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 10:33:12 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Paul Wouters (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 05:27:48 EST)
• [Design] UML failed.. pls help Calvin (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 04:46:29 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Sandy Harris (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 19:36:47 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Richard Guy Briggs (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 19:47:22 EST)
• Re: [Design] Re: [Users] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack Richard Guy Briggs (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:39:06 EST)
• [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Stephen J. Bevan (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:45:50 EST)
• Re: [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? Paul Wouters (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:16:46 EST)
• Re: [Design] RSA keys Michael Richardson (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 14:45:55 EST)
• [Design] IPSec in 2.5 Kernel? John S. Denker (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:20:34 EST)
• Re: [Design] RSA keys Andreas Steffen (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 08:52:22 EST)
• [Design] RSA keys Roberto Barcellona (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 07:55:33 EST)
• [Design] compiling with openssl Roberto Barcellona (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 03:14:44 EST)
• [Design] Karsten Blees/DCon is out of the office. blees(at)dcon.de (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 19:00:26 EST)
• [Design] IPSEC-FreeSwan and Radius Proxy Server Carlos Alejandro Aguero (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 10:50:03 EST)
• [Design] stop annoying pop up ads forever popupzapper_only_19.95(at)cs.com (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 01:44:41 EST)
• [Design] How to build RedHat RPMs for 1.x FS (1.98/1.99) Sam Sgro (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:31:20 EST)
• Re: [Design] mast(4) Sandy Harris (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:41:32 EST)
• Re: [Design] ipsec can not start Ken Bantoft (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:42:20 EST)
• Re: [Design] mast(4) John S. Denker (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:08:13 EST)
• [Design] ipsec can not start Ð¤º£ÌΠ(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 06:29:27 EST)
• [Design] nit in headers D. Hugh Redelmeier (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:11:34 EST)
• Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Jim Carter (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:04:44 EST)
• Re: [Design] snapshot with new OE behavior Paul Wouters (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 08:45:02 EST)
• Re: [Design] a question about x509cert exchange Andreas Steffen (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 06:50:27 EST)
• [Design] a question about x509cert yli (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:29:14 EST)
• [Design] snapshot with new OE behavior Sam Sgro (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 06:09:33 EST)
• Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Sam Sgro (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:40:47 EST)
• [Design] a question about x509cert exchange yli (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:59:29 EST)
• Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Michael Richardson (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:03:54 EST)
• Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default D. Hugh Redelmeier (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:38:24 EST)
• Re: [Design] how to get differing DNS results Michael Richardson (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:33:40 EST)
• Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default D. Hugh Redelmeier (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:57:36 EST)
• Re: [Design] pluto not responding -- possibly not re-entrant (updown) D. Hugh Redelmeier (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 16:08:58 EST)
• Re: [Design] pluto not responding -- possibly not re-entrant (updown) John S. Denker (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:52:01 EST)
• [Design] adding POLICY_* bits to Pluto [was Re: [Users] (no subject)] D. Hugh Redelmeier (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:56:46 EST)
• Re: [Design] mast(4) D. Hugh Redelmeier (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:50:15 EST)
• Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Paul Wouters (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:39:22 EST)
• Re: [Design] pluto not responding -- possibly not re-entrant (updown) D. Hugh Redelmeier (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:11:07 EST)
• Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Henry Spencer (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:06:32 EST)
• Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default John S. Denker (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:39:19 EST)
• Re: [Design] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack John S. Denker (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:13:41 EST)
• Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Paul Wouters (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:24:01 EST)
• Re: [Design] how to get differing DNS results Paul Wouters (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:06:47 EST)
• Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default Sam Sgro (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 07:51:09 EST)
• Re: [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default D. Hugh Redelmeier (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:27:41 EST)
• [Design] Re: self-KEY check D. Hugh Redelmeier (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:31:20 EST)
• Re: [Design] plutostderrlog= Michael Richardson (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:41:08 EST)
• [Design] self-KEY check Michael Richardson (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:58:29 EST)
• [Design] how to get differing DNS results Michael Richardson (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:09:54 EST)
• [Design] SNAT and OE Michael Richardson (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:32:38 EST)
• Re: [Design] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack Nico Baggus (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:27:05 EST)
• [Design] lookup of self-TXT/KEY Michael Richardson (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:42:30 EST)
• [Design] Re: lookup of self-TXT/KEY D. Hugh Redelmeier (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:12:27 EST)
• [Design] what will happen when to execute command line "ipsec auto --up "? yli (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 02:06:28 EST)
• [Design] Re: [Users] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack Phillip.Watts(at)nlynx.com (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:32:37 EST)
• [Design] Re: [Users] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack John S. Denker (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:53:35 EST)
• [Design] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack martin f krafft (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 08:12:27 EST)
• [Design] letting traffic flow through a SG by default D. Hugh Redelmeier (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:03:22 EST)
• [Design] (no subject) Roberto Barcellona (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 03:45:26 EST)
• Re: [Design] [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems Stephen J. Bevan (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 20:24:50 EST)
• Re: [Design] plutostderrlog= D. Hugh Redelmeier (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 20:22:43 EST)
• [Design] plutostderrlog= Michael Richardson (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:52:21 EST)
• Re: [Design] [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems John S. Denker (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:15:33 EST)
• Re: [Design] [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems Stephen J. Bevan (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:23:32 EST)
• Re: [Design] [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems John S. Denker (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 10:57:10 EST)
• [Design] [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems Stephen J. Bevan (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:04:19 EST)
• [Design] ipsec auto --status now shows debug settings D. Hugh Redelmeier (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:07:37 EST)
• [Design] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems John S. Denker (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:27:01 EST)
• Re: [Design] freeswan and sharp pda Ken Bantoft (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:37:14 EST)
• [Design] freeswan and sharp pda Kaustubh Kumbhalkar (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:21:05 EST)
• [Design] tests not run by make check D. Hugh Redelmeier (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 04:45:38 EST)
• Re: [Design] a review of make check output Michael Richardson (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 10:05:02 EST)
• [Design] ICMP processing relevant to IPSEC sampanna(at)codito.com (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 10:11:46 EST)
• [Design] a review of make check output D. Hugh Redelmeier (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 22:47:20 EST)
• [Design] Re: best uml patch Michael Richardson (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 19:31:51 EST)
• [Design] Sam's concerns about 2.00 D. Hugh Redelmeier (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 13:36:51 EST)
• [Design] How does pluto read ipsec.conf options? Roberto Barcellona (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 06:03:23 EST)
• Re: [Design] How does pluto read ipsec.conf options? Andreas Steffen (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 07:07:37 EST)
• [Design] interaction between confread and pluto Roberto Barcellona (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 08:25:16 EST)
• [Design] best uml patch D. Hugh Redelmeier (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 03:50:19 EST)
• [Design] ipsec verify fix D. Hugh Redelmeier (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 18:05:57 EST)
• Re: [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Jim Carter (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:44:58 EST)
• [Design] pluto now checks our sides DNS credentials for Opportunism D. Hugh Redelmeier (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:46:16 EST)
• [Design] Re: [Users] error status 139 Igmar Palsenberg (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:11:48 EST)
• Re: [Design] Feature request: ipsec showhostkey --reverse Sam Sgro (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:54:01 EST)
• Re: [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Claudia Schmeing (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:33:08 EST)
• [Design] Feature request: ipsec showhostkey --reverse Claudia Schmeing (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:08:10 EST)
• [Design] Simplifying OE troubleshooting Claudia Schmeing (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 15:45:53 EST)
• [Design] Re: multiple ipsec.secrets entries Andreas Steffen (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 13:14:54 EST)
• [Design] Re: multiple ipsec.secrets entries Road Warrior (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 12:46:31 EST)
• [Design] ipsec.conf(5): finish updating to special keyingtries value %forever D. Hugh Redelmeier (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 17:30:10 EST)
• Re: [Design] Making KLIPS 1 asynchronous to support H/W crypto Richard Guy Briggs (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 16:33:04 EST)
• Re: [Design] Making KLIPS 1 asynchronous to support H/W crypto Richard Guy Briggs (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:19:20 EST)
• Re: [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Michael Richardson (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:00:49 EST)
• Re: [Design] Making KLIPS 1 asynchronous to support H/W crypto Michael Richardson (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:46:59 EST)
• Re: [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Paul Wouters (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:26:20 EST)
• Re: [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Michael Richardson (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:31:03 EST)
• [Design] Making KLIPS 1 asynchronous to support H/W crypto Arthur van Leeuwen (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 09:44:06 EST)
• Re: [Design] Re: [Users] multiple ipsec.secrets entries Michael Richardson (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:17:54 EST)
• Re: [Design] Re: [Users] multiple ipsec.secrets entries Andreas Steffen (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:31:38 EST)
• Re: [Design] Re: [Users] multiple ipsec.secrets entries Andreas Steffen (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 07:46:18 EST)
• [Design] FreeS/WAN graphical configurator (was: Making FreeS/WAN harder to use) John A. Sullivan III (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 05:49:24 EST)
• Re: [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Paul Wouters (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 04:32:32 EST)
• [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Sam Sgro (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 20:25:27 EST)
• Re: [Design] Re: [Users] multiple ipsec.secrets entries Michael Richardson (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 19:17:52 EST)
• [Design] Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. John S. Denker (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 05:01:53 EST)
• [Design] Re: Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. D. Hugh Redelmeier (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 22:58:17 EST)
• [Design] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY. Hugh Daniel (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 21:41:47 EST)