Pantek Library

Hosting Provided By

CybrHost

High Speed Hosting

Re: [Hipsec] Re: The exact method used to generate a HIT from a HI

From: Andrew McGregor <andrew(at)indranet.co.nz>
Date: Sun Mar 16 2003 - 13:50:28 EST

--On Friday, March 14, 2003 14:27:26 +0200 Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com> wrote:

> Note that the current draft-jokela also uses RFC2636 format,

Hmm. What I did boils down to hashing the RFC2536 representation of the HI.

It seems reasonable to say 'hash whatever you would put in the data field of a host identity TLV'. That way we can independently decide on the HI representation, and the HIT calculation will follow.

Andrew

Hipsec mailing list
Hipsec@lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Received on Mon Mar 17 15:16:10 2003

Do you need help?

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Pekka Nikander: "Re: [Hipsec] More about LSIs"
Previous message: Andrew McGregor: "Re: [Hipsec] More about LSIs"
In reply to Pekka Nikander: "Re: [Hipsec] Re: The exact method used to generate a HIT from a HI"
Next in thread: Pekka Nikander: "[Hipsec] RFC2535 or RFC2536?"
Reply: Pekka Nikander: "[Hipsec] RFC2535 or RFC2536?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 12:59:58 EDT

Contact Us Legal Notices Order Services Online
Pantek Home Privacy Policy IT news Site Map Pantek Library