Re: [Users] NAT to NAT Opportunistic Traversal

Hi Sam,

        Firstly, thanks so very much for such a comprehensive reply. It's very much appreciated.

> There are two solutions to this problem, which I can discuss in a moment, but

I intended on doing so anyways, ie:

192.168.5.0/24 (default gateway is 192.168.5.1/24) |

192.168.5.1/32 (vpnleft) 192.168.0.3/32 (default gateway is 			| 
             192.168.0.1/32, is this configured in ipsec.conf or |		 

> Two solutions:

I'm just testing at the moment for a real-life situation, but my routers are basic ADSL/Cable ones? I don't know anything about ESP, only UDP and TCP - will these routers allow this kind of traffic?

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related lists.freeswan.org Links 1998-fall 1998-spring 1998-summer 1998-winter 1999-winter announce briefs bugs design freeswan-list hipsec ietf-sectest users users-admin Request more information about Pantek

I'm also going to have to make a 56K dialup VPN connection some point soon. I am considering using a FreeSCO or LRP as a dialup router, do you have any reccomendations with this? Again, this will be on a dynamic IP and will use a dyndns like hostname.

> See section 4.4 the Installation and Configuration guide for the X.509 patch

I already downloaded and installed the pre-patched X.509 ver of FreeS/WAN if this helps?

I lile the sound of option 2 equally to 1 at this point, I'm not afraid to recompile the kernel to get the results I need provided there is sufficient documentation.

Again, thanks for all your help.

Alistair J. Ross