Pantek Library

Hosting Provided By

CybrHost

High Speed Hosting

[Users] Do I really need x509 patches for Win2K client?

From: Ian Hunter <ihunter(at)hunterweb.net>
Date: Fri Feb 28 2003 - 17:30:15 EST

And if so, do I really need to build kernel patches to build my own FREES/WAN? I have an Intel based SuSE 8.0 box as my router/firewall and I'd like to make it my VPN host. Unfortunately, after downloading and doing lots of reading, it says I have to build my own kernel, then patch FREES/WAN with x509, then build FREES/WAN into my kernel. Sounds like a pain in the neck.

Any comments?

Users mailing list
Users@lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users Received on Fri Feb 28 21:28:49 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ken Bantoft: "Re: [Users] Re: Cisco 3000 Concentrator"
Previous message: Hien Nguyen: "[Users] Help: FreeSwan Performance Number"
Next in thread: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Do I really need x509 patches for Win2K client?"
Reply: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Do I really need x509 patches for Win2K client?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 13:00:26 EDT

Contact Us Legal Notices Order Services Online
Pantek Home Privacy Policy IT news Site Map Pantek Library