|
|||||||||||
|
[Users] RE: Cisco 3000 Concentrator
From: David Prestwich <dprestwich(at)pacsim.com>
Date: Fri Feb 28 2003 - 11:47:45 EST
We added the rightid=10.190.180.10 and established the connection. Totally forgot that one. We have yet to check packets and routing but that did the trick. The question now becomes, how can I still blame the other company ;)
Thanks again,
-----Original Message-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Admin Note: Post to users@lists.freeswan.org for a larger audience - sfs-users is a virus/spam filtered sublist. And now onto the problem at hand: On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, David Prestwich wrote: > According to the company, the Cisco Concentrator is behind the firewall in
NAT does things like this all the time. Things to try: On your end, try setting forcing the ID:
rightid=10.190.180.10 or
On the PIX side - they appear to be mangling IPSec packets somehow, which is inherently evil and gives problems like this. If they play to do IPSec connections to other devices, they will run into issues like this every time... giving a *real* ip to the 3000 is recommended for future sanity :) I have a PIX stuffed in my desk here, perhaps I'll finally break it out. Anyone know how to crack the password of it? (Came from one of our now-closed/laid-off offices)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQCVAwUBPl6J01iWUusaxGxpAQH2kQP/U7YhN6ucCJcd+D16XvF/DnDgE0WBtOho
pPQAPBbyL6q6JePUQeeXttFPSCpUfBGS2Ahfjv5lH+Bc5qmwV2ZoNpp4qqzg1Z79
QGgLrBcERatfFgb6jpVIjzzOz9choAbZvuEj8kKAtQKFNMBgvEs9c4J8GmlXDqD3
9/Wb1B0NMAo=
Users mailing list Users@lists.freeswan.org http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users Received on Fri Feb 28 23:09:36 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 13:00:27 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||