|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [Users] Performance freeswan
From: Alex Pankratov <alex(at)cipherica.com>
Date: Sun Mar 23 2003 - 19:38:19 EST My money is on the excessive packet fragmentation. If DF flag is not copied, but reset instead, the traffic will still flow, but excessive fragmentation will degrade the performance quite a bit. IPsec clients (including IIRC Sentinel) sometimes have an advanced option controlling DF-copying behaviour. It is quite useful to troubleshoot scenarios with buggy *cough*Linksys *cough* routers. Alternately, you can try configuring built-in XP IPsec agent and see if performance improves. If it does, then Sentinel is obviously at fault. Also check that Sentinel is not configured to do any sort of excessive logging or auditing. /alex
G.T. van Amersfoort wrote:
Users mailing list Users@lists.freeswan.org http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users Received on Sun Mar 23 21:30:18 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 13:01:02 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||