Re: [Users] northgate-southnet connection hardly works

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Christoph Haas wrote:

> What I'm trying to do is establish a VPN tunnel between a VPN gateway

The following connection should also accomplish this:

conn leftnet-rightgate

	left=80.58.129.14
	leftsubnet=10.129.25.0/24
	right=212.21.85.114
	auto=add

You don't need to define "rightsubnet"; if it is omitted, you're assumed to be negotiating a tunnel for "right" itself.

As well, what are the strange errors you receive when you omit:

leftid=80.58.129.14

> The other side is configered vice versa. Now when I 'add' this

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related lists.freeswan.org Links 1998-fall 1998-spring 1998-summer 1998-winter 1999-winter announce briefs bugs design freeswan-list hipsec ietf-sectest users users-admin Request more information about Pantek

What version of FreeS/WAN are you running on both machines? Previously, we were theorizing that FreeS/WAN 1.96 might contain a bug that could confound renegotiation when a net-gate tunnel is in play. Using Debian 1.99 packages would rule that out.

• -- Sam Sgro sam@freeswan.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: For the matching public key, finger the Reply-To: address.

iQCVAwUBPoWaEkOSC4btEQUtAQG13wQAox1OnHoioQrDJqQGY4vj7uEkUbxDKeAX 9gp6tOC49XoP0QyGeIyb5dt29IZLt8wpqNo1YmL0K4HaIgY0UBoymQFTT1iMxdd7 jkR2wdAyTImikY5SOq5ofrrPwctE72X2t3nqaoh2UgZ3pM1APnBa8VIEvjNY+y0C bE8kBa29Wk0=
=zjzX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----