Re: [Users] ssh sentinel could not connect between linksys befsr41 to freeswan with nat-t

From: Alex Pankratov <alex(at)cipherica.com>
Date: Sun Mar 30 2003 - 20:54:12 EST

I doubt it will help. I dont know what exact Rifath's problem is, but disabling IPsec passthrough will not change anything. Most likely there is a single machine behind Linksys doing IKE and thus the port does not change during AT. The problem is elsewhere.

Ken Bantoft wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>Mar 18 18:29:42 vpnsrv pluto[5096]: "sentinel"[17] 67.68.89.10 #31: Warning: peer is NATed but source port is
>> still udp/500. Ipsec-passthrough NAT device suspected -- NAT-T may not work.
>>Mar 18 18:30:47 vpnsrv pluto[5096]: "sentinel"[17] 67.68.89.10 #32: Warning: peer is NATed but source port is
>> still udp/500. Ipsec-passthrough NAT device suspected -- NAT-T may not work.

>
>
>
> - --

---

Users mailing list
Users@lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users Received on Sun Apr 6 05:41:34 2003