Re: [Users] Problem with Cisco 3000

From: Ken Bantoft <ken(at)freeswan.ca>
Date: Fri Oct 10 2003 - 13:43:51 EDT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 ipsec@ns1.mailer.org wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Ken Bantoft wrote:

RFC doesn't give defaults, so everyone can pick what they want, and claim to be "standard". I don't like the idea of matching one vendor over another, thus defaults are arbitrarily picked, several years ago before Cisco was shipping IPSec with 3des support :) If you go by #deployed boxes, we'd have to match Microsoft's "standards", and I don't think you'd want that either.

> even if it is not mandated in the IPSEC RFC. OTOH I am the one asking for

• -- Ken Bantoft Super FreeS/WAN Maintainer ken(at)freeswan.ca http://www.freeswan.ca PGP Key: finger ken@bantoft.org "My biggest job is to say 'no' to new features."
  • Linus Torvalds -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/hu/ZPiOgilmwgkgRAtDcAJ4gkQmjSExKdAYVZZa7d3luNl+0KgCgqE6s ggIfvDEx9aozWSsGdnl555I=
=soEP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---

FreeS/WAN Users mailing list
users@lists.freeswan.org
https://mj2.freeswan.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr Received on Fri Oct 10 15:21:35 2003