Mailing List Archive For users@freeswan.org Apr 2003 By Date

• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 19:50:40 EDT
  • [Users] no connection has been authorized Russell Handorf 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 23:35:46 EDT
  • [Users] ipsec tunnel on server call back dial up its ravi 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 12:26:27 EDT
  • [Users] MSL2TP win98 client + freeswan Carlos Sierra 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 01:59:06 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Pix interop Daniel Djamaludin 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 06:36:06 EDT
  • Re: [Users] L2TP and Freeswan PPPD problems. Jacco de Leeuw 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 16:14:09 EDT
  • [Users] Need some help liulin 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 21:52:20 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT-Traversal patch: [disabled] Ken Bantoft 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 21:48:10 EDT
  • [Users] [Help] Please Help me about FreeS/WAN question........Thanks axacheng 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 07:02:27 EDT
  • Re: [Users] bandwidth Tuomo Soini 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 15:37:49 EDT
  • [Users] iptables SNAT interfering with IKE Bill Cornatzer 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 07:49:24 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Pix interop Frank de Groodt 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 09:27:16 EDT
  • [Users] start a connection 2nd trial Lorbeer Jan 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 17:16:40 EDT
  • [Users] client to server connection, is it possible? Fabricio Webster 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 21:18:28 EDT
  • [Users] [Help] Please Help me about FreeS/WAN question........Thanks axacheng 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 05:43:10 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Sonicwall Phase 2 troubles Daniel Melanchthon 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 01:58:00 EDT
  • [Users] pfkey write failed returning -1 with errno=22 kchen 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 12:46:41 EDT
  • [Users] connection established but not traffic Elmar Grote 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 19:41:09 EDT
  • [Users] RE: Unexplained no passphrase error Lists 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 07:38:01 EDT
  • [Users] Problem during Negotiation Stage Kristian Du 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 07:16:40 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Windows XP X.509 L2TP/IPSEC NAT problem Jacco de Leeuw 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 20:45:11 EDT
  • [Users] Windows 98 can't connect Chris Jensen 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 00:05:50 EDT
  • [Users] Connection stuck at STATE_MAIN_I3 Aspirant S 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 20:20:59 EDT
  • [Users] ÆóÒµµç×ÓÉÌÎñ 8:20:54:29 »¶Ó­·ÃÎÊ 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 16:41:38 EDT
  • [Users] Good Tunnel Bad POSTROUTING David Colwell 
• Sun Apr 27 2003 - 20:38:36 EDT
  • [Users] More help please philt 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 04:48:34 EDT
  • [Users] start connection Lorbeer Jan 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 17:33:02 EDT
  • [Users] Unexplained no passphrase error Lists 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 14:00:20 EDT
  • [Users] L2TP+NAT-T BAD_PROPOSAL_SYNTAX Carlos Sierra 
• Sun Apr 27 2003 - 20:52:53 EDT
  • [Users] More help please Just getting started philt 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 17:11:07 EDT
  • [Users] client software for frees/wan Fabricio Webster 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 18:33:22 EDT
  • [Users] Fwd: Problems with patches for AES... Jiva DeVoe 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 08:44:45 EDT
  • [Users] Freeswan ipchains firewall lit00084(at)planet.nl 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 12:23:16 EDT
  • [Users] VPN routers Russell Handorf 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 05:55:10 EDT
  • [Users] IPv6 + IPSec tito 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 06:14:44 EDT
  • [Users] Roadwarriors access to two different subnet Francesco 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 23:37:01 EDT
  • [Users] hello fdsi(at)jkdee.com 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 20:58:56 EDT
  • [Users] Securing wireless networks through IPsec Per von Zweigbergk 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 20:59:27 EDT
  • [Users] home gateway not listening philt 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 15:02:13 EDT
  • Re: [Users] bandwidth Sam Sgro 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 17:08:23 EDT
  • [Users] Problems with patches for AES... Jiva DeVoe 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 09:57:02 EDT
  • [Users] help in build kernel kchen 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 05:24:36 EDT
  • [Users] roadwarriors with "%any" ip and x509 certs? coUnt3r(at)gmx.net 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 08:01:43 EDT
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)mail.freeswan.org 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 20:58:52 EDT
  • Re: [Users] bandwidth ??? Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 03:57:20 EDT
  • [Users] Kernel 2.5/2.6 IPsec Howto Ralf Spenneberg 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 02:55:06 EDT
  • [Users] pfkey write failed returning -1 with errno=22 kchen 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 08:02:45 EDT
  • [Users] no connection has been authorized Sean Loch 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 15:13:03 EDT
  • FWD: [Users] DJBDNS IN KEY utility Ralph Blach 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 03:26:27 EDT
  • [Users] Hello,users,the Garden of Eden dmessiah 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 03:54:57 EDT
  • Re: [Users] bandwidth Corey Rogers 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 04:46:17 EDT
  • [Users] problem with freeswan behind router Sven-Torben Janus 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 15:13:48 EDT
  • [Users] NGN Drazen Vidakovic 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 05:36:21 EDT
  • [Users] Problem during Negotiation Stage Kristian Du 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 08:32:05 EDT
  • [Users] FreeS/WAN Documentation 1.99 -> 2.00 Muenz, Michael 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 01:07:35 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT-Traversal patch: [disabled] Jarle Aase 
• Wed Apr 30 2003 - 06:18:01 EDT
  • Re: [Users] bandwidth ??? coUnt3r(at)gmx.net 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 07:32:57 EDT
  • [Users] ANNOUNCE: X.509 version 1.3.1 for freeswan-2.00 released Andreas Steffen 
• Tue Apr 29 2003 - 21:49:46 EDT
  • Re: [Users] bandwidth ??? Ken Bantoft 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 14:25:58 EDT
  • [Users] problems when connection between win and freeswan with X509 Wudejun 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 08:59:22 EDT
  • [Users] DJBDNS IN KEY utility Pawe³ Krawczyk 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 05:37:44 EDT
  • [Users] Remember Mother's Day 11th May 2003 Prince's Flower Shop Pte Ltd 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 14:01:39 EDT
  • Re: [Users] L2TP and Freeswan PPPD problems. Peter Dolloff 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 10:13:06 EDT
  • [Users] bandwidth Laurent DANCIN 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 09:48:42 EDT
  • [Users] Pix interop Frank de Groodt 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 09:46:45 EDT
  • [Users] bandwidth ??? Laurent DANCIN 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 12:39:04 EDT
  • [Users] Freeswan and Red Hat 9 Antonio Ghoro 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 03:34:58 EDT
  • [Users] WG: 2nd (re)connection not possible Kock Andreas 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 04:29:08 EDT
  • [Users] L2TP and Freeswan PPPD problems. Ed Murray 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 04:37:25 EDT
  • Re: [Users] "pluto failed" about FreeS/WAN with X.509 patches Andreas Steffen 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 04:42:23 EDT
  • [Users] 2002 SONICblue Inc report 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 03:31:47 EDT
  • Re: [Users] "pluto failed" about FreeS/WAN with X.509 patches Andreas Steffen 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 03:25:40 EDT
  • Antw: [Users] "pluto failed" about FreeS/WAN with X.509 patches Uwe Knop 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 03:33:33 EDT
  • [Users] Marcus Mueller ipsec tool Olivier JAVAUX 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 02:33:17 EDT
  • [Users] 2.00 is here! Claudia Schmeing 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 02:16:27 EDT
  • [Users] "pluto failed" about FreeS/WAN with X.509 patches Wu DeJun 
• Mon Apr 28 2003 - 02:33:06 EDT
  • Re: [Users] RoadWarrior Setup between Win2K and Freeswan 1.91 with X509 Certi ficates Andreas Steffen 
• Sun Apr 27 2003 - 21:54:59 EDT
  • [Users] [Q]shunt route is still unclear... tom Lui 
• Sun Apr 27 2003 - 20:57:09 EDT
  • Re: [Users] ANNOUNCE: Super FreeS/WAN 1.99.7rc2 Released Daniel Djamaludin 
• Sun Apr 27 2003 - 18:43:48 EDT
  • [Users] RoadWarrior Setup between Win2K and Freeswan 1.91 with X509 Certi ficates Mark Smith 
• Sun Apr 27 2003 - 02:22:08 EDT
  • [Users] road warrior Andre 
• Sat Apr 26 2003 - 16:02:46 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Developer Question Andreas Steffen 
• Sat Apr 26 2003 - 14:33:56 EDT
  • [Users] Developer Question Eaton, Andy 
• Sat Apr 26 2003 - 13:53:32 EDT
  • Re: [Users] IKE (Internet Key Exchange) Question Alex Pankratov 
• Sat Apr 26 2003 - 02:05:02 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Trying to make the connection Andreas Steffen 
• Sat Apr 26 2003 - 02:11:44 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Freeswan Andreas Steffen 
• Sat Apr 26 2003 - 02:16:53 EDT
  • [Users] IKE (Internet Key Exchange) Question Sam 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 09:55:42 EDT
  • [Users] rp_filter at ppp0 philt 
• Sat Apr 26 2003 - 00:32:57 EDT
  • [Users] Freeswan <-> Sonicwall VPN works with IP, but not with dns gatewa y name Freeswan-users 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 12:04:47 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Windows XP X.509 L2TP/IPSEC NAT problem Carlos Sierra 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 23:39:56 EDT
  • [Users] Trying to make the connection philt 
• Sat Apr 26 2003 - 00:24:19 EDT
  • Re: [Users] rp_filter at ppp0 Craig Whitmore 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 16:57:55 EDT
  • Re: [Users] GRE tunnel Jorge Rocha 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 18:30:17 EDT
  • [Users] Freeswan Russell Handorf 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 23:04:54 EDT
  • [Users] ANNOUNCE: Super FreeS/WAN 1.99.7rc2 Released Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 14:26:28 EDT
  • [Users] Packet order Francis GASCHET 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 10:12:06 EDT
  • [Users] ANNOUNCE: Super FreeS/WAN 1.99.6.2 Released Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 10:20:49 EDT
  • Re: [Users] IPSec Christoph Haas 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 16:53:10 EDT
  • Re: [Users] GRE tunnel Jorge Rocha 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 09:05:55 EDT
  • [Users] frees/wan and nortel Dhaval Patel 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 08:11:00 EDT
  • [Users] Windows XP X.509 L2TP/IPSEC NAT problem Carlos Sierra 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 06:04:14 EDT
  • [Users] IPSec Jimmy Yap 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 04:28:34 EDT
  • Re: [Users] GRE tunnel Rupert Weber-Henschel 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 02:48:50 EDT
  • [Users] IKE (Internet Key Exchange) Question Stephen J. Bevan 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 03:03:33 EDT
  • [Users] GRE tunnel Jorge Rocha 
• Fri Apr 25 2003 - 02:59:53 EDT
  • [Users] GRE tunnel Jorge Rocha 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 22:35:53 EDT
  • Re: [Users] roadwarrior can't ping Sam Sgro 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 20:56:31 EDT
  • [Users] IKE (Internet Key Exchange) Question Sam 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 16:18:59 EDT
  • [Users] roadwarrior can't ping Martin Radosta 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 17:39:46 EDT
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)mail.freeswan.org 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 17:19:21 EDT
  • Re: [Users] client for freeswan Yves Bertsch 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 16:07:13 EDT
  • Re: [Users] trying to set up freeswan with xp Andreas Steffen 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 15:25:10 EDT
  • [Users] A special new website lermen 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 14:42:43 EDT
  • [Users] trying to set up freeswan with xp Miriam Cohen 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 11:51:40 EDT
  • Re: [Users] starting a script in /usr/local/lib/ipsec/_updown Ken Bantoft 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 11:37:24 EDT
  • [Users] HOWTO get an IP address from peer LAN Jean Marc AVE 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 10:08:13 EDT
  • [Users] starting a script in /usr/local/lib/ipsec/_updown Glatzel Tino 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 10:21:47 EDT
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)mail.freeswan.org 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 07:08:14 EDT
  • [Users] Undeliverable mail--"Technology provided by Google" postmaster 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 07:48:25 EDT
  • [Users] routing problem Jens Huebel 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 05:02:39 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Policy based routing in _updown script? Tuomo Soini 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 05:40:00 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Policy based routing in _updown script? Andreas Haumer 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 04:28:20 EDT
  • [Users] Vigor 2600We <> Freeswan Andrew Griffiths 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 02:29:41 EDT
  • [Users] Freeswan and SSH or PGPnet Eaton, Andy 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 23:46:17 EDT
  • R: [Users] More than one PSK Stephen J. Bevan 
• Thu Apr 24 2003 - 00:26:48 EDT
  • Re: [Users] x509 patch Andreas Steffen 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 23:36:50 EDT
  • [Users] Policy based routing in _updown script? Stephen J. Bevan 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 18:26:20 EDT
  • Re: [Users] More than one PSK Daniel Djamaludin 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 17:18:18 EDT
  • RE: [Users] tunnel or transport Shane 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 18:12:21 EDT
  • [Users] Re: Cracking preshared keys (fwd) Paul Wouters 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 16:16:03 EDT
  • [Users] x509 patch John van Lit 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 16:22:05 EDT
  • Re: [Users] SSH Sentinel Road Warriors with DHCP over IPSEC problem John A. Sullivan III 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 16:29:48 EDT
  • [Users] xgo Super-Freeswan-1.99.6.1 on 2.4.20 problem John A. Sullivan III 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 15:37:42 EDT
  • R: [Users] More than one PSK Francesco 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 14:49:06 EDT
  • [Users] Réf. : Re: [Users] Stuck %hold eroutes after --down and --up mlafon(at)arkoon.net 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 14:20:39 EDT
  • Re: [Users] What does PLUTO do for an eroute having %hold ?? tom Lui 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 14:02:03 EDT
  • Re: [Users] tons of logs with ssh sentinal as roadwarrior Andreas Steffen 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 12:44:07 EDT
  • [Users] tunnel or transport Shane 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 09:17:48 EDT
  • Re: [Users] roadwarriors with x509 and preshared secret Andreas Steffen 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 09:24:35 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Stuck in STATE_MAIN_I1,...But no connection has been authorized Andreas Steffen 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 09:26:41 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Freeswan <-> Checkpoint FW1 Andreas Steffen 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 09:46:10 EDT
  • [Users] linux server to cisco router where cisco has dynamic ip? James Harper 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 08:43:40 EDT
  • [Users] SSH Sentinel Road Warriors with DHCP over IPSEC problem Matt Dainty 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 10:32:26 EDT
  • [Users] ip_masq_ipsec Sergio A Lima Jr 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 09:13:15 EDT
  • [Users] (no subject) ERIC WALKER 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 08:01:36 EDT
  • [Users] Policy based routing in _updown script? Andreas Haumer 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 09:19:00 EDT
  • [Users] tons of logs with ssh sentinal as roadwarrior Ingo Bruell 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 07:23:03 EDT
  • Re: [Users] More than one PSK Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 07:27:23 EDT
  • Re: [Users] What does PLUTO do for an eroute having %hold ?? Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 03:13:28 EDT
  • AW: [Users] More than one PSK Philipp Snizek 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 09:08:13 EDT
  • [Users] yŒƒˆÀzƒuƒ‰ƒ“ƒhŽžŒvEBagy1/100‚Ì“Á‰¿z brand 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 07:11:46 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Freeswan <-> Checkpoint FW1 Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 07:24:26 EDT
  • Re: [Users] radius auth against freeswan Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 07:12:54 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Documentation question Ken Bantoft 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 18:04:52 EDT
  • [Users] Re: Question about natting config. Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 05:03:31 EDT
  • Re: [Users] More than one PSK Sam Sgro 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 05:54:19 EDT
  • [Users] radius auth against freeswan Philipp Snizek 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 05:59:56 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Stuck in STATE_MAIN_I1,...But no connection has been authorized Prabhanjan.Gurumohan(at)asu.edu 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 04:38:30 EDT
  • Re: [Users] roadwarriors with x509 and preshared secret Sam Sgro 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 04:47:20 EDT
  • Re: [Users] route-client output: /usr/local/lib/ipsec/_updown: (incorrect or missing nexthop setting??) Sam Sgro 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 05:50:58 EDT
  • [Users] What does PLUTO do for an eroute having %hold ?? tom Lui 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 03:13:53 EDT
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)mail.freeswan.org 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 04:54:19 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Freeswan <-> Checkpoint FW1 Sam Sgro 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 03:30:43 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Stuck in STATE_MAIN_I1,...But no connection has been authorized Sam Sgro 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 03:13:29 EDT
  • Re: [Users] FreeS/WAN 1.99 installation Sam Sgro 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 02:47:37 EDT
  • AW: [Users] route-client output: /usr/local/lib/ipsec/_updown: (i ncorrect ormissing nexthop setting??) Berlinger Patrick 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 02:49:36 EDT
  • Re: [Users] client for freeswan John S. Denker 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 03:18:54 EDT
  • Re: [Users] client for freeswan Sam Sgro 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 03:33:56 EDT
  • Re: [Users] IP Tunnel in only one direction possible Sam Sgro 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 17:26:56 EDT
  • [Users] More than one PSK Francesco 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 02:37:05 EDT
  • [Users] test Yves Bertsch 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 01:23:39 EDT
  • [Users] More than one PSK Francesco 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 15:33:56 EDT
  • [Users] Documentation question Moncef Elaoud 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 19:02:26 EDT
  • [Users] RoadWarrior Setup between Win2K and Freeswan 1.91 with X509 Certi ficates Mark Smith 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 23:28:02 EDT
  • Re: R: R: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients Sam Sgro 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 12:54:48 EDT
  • [Users] In order to use certificates. Jean Marc AVE 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 13:10:00 EDT
  • [Users] Telephone number jrussi 
• Wed Apr 23 2003 - 01:07:03 EDT
  • [Users] ipsec_lifetimes Melkor Ainur 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 07:48:51 EDT
  • [Users] Freeswan <-> Checkpoint FW1 Kunze, Marcus 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 09:42:21 EDT
  • [Users] route-client output: /usr/local/lib/ipsec/_updown: (incorrect or missing nexthop setting??) Jens Huebel 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 04:51:07 EDT
  • [Users] Stuck in STATE_MAIN_I1,...But no connection has been authorized Prabhanjan.Gurumohan(at)asu.edu 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 10:17:42 EDT
  • [Users] client for freeswan Yves Bertsch 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 09:04:13 EDT
  • Re: R: R: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients Ken Bantoft 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 09:38:51 EDT
  • [Users] IP Tunnel in only one direction possible p.uebing(at)teleconnect-service.de 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 04:10:59 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Routing between several VPN networks Wijnand Wiersma 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 03:44:34 EDT
  • Re: [Users] strange connection problem Matthias Henze 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 04:18:33 EDT
  • [Users] Marcus Mueller ipsec tool Olivier JAVAUX 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 18:40:32 EDT
  • [Users] FreeS/WAN 1.99 installation jaykay(at)rgh.org 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 03:47:02 EDT
  • Re: [Users] strange connection problem Matthias Henze 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 02:55:01 EDT
  • R: R: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients Francesco 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 02:27:55 EDT
  • Re: [Users] ANNOUNCE: x509patch-0.9.28-freeswan-1.99 and x509-1.3.1-freeswan-2.00-rc2 released Andreas Steffen 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 02:43:51 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Stuck %hold eroutes after --down and --up Rene Mayrhofer 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 03:39:25 EDT
  • [Users] Re: Réf. : Re: [Users] Stuck %hold eroutes after --down and --up Rene Mayrhofer 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 03:35:24 EDT
  • [Users] Réf. : Re: [Users] Stuck %hold eroutes after --down and --up mlafon(at)arkoon.net 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 04:13:57 EDT
  • [Users] Still can't ping - please help stuart 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 02:36:22 EDT
  • [Users] roadwarriors with x509 and preshared secret Andreas Marbet 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 02:19:12 EDT
  • [Users] freeswan host behind alteon AD3 Ng Koon Book 
• Tue Apr 22 2003 - 00:12:29 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Trying RH 9 Alan Bunch 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 21:55:54 EDT
  • [Users] Sample pluto updown script Antonino Iannella 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 20:16:54 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Trying RH 9 Sam Sgro 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 19:03:59 EDT
  • Re: [Users] ANNOUNCE: x509patch-0.9.28-freeswan-1.99 and x509-1.3.1-freeswan-2.00-rc2 released Ken Bantoft 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 17:26:06 EDT
  • Re: [Users] ANNOUNCE: x509patch-0.9.28-freeswan-1.99 and x509-1.3.1-freeswan-2.00-rc2 released Nels Lindquist 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 15:26:31 EDT
  • [Users] compiling kernel 2.4.18 doesn't let me create ipsec module Arturo Castro 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 15:41:41 EDT
  • [Users] router connectivity... Shane 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 15:05:19 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Can't ping through tunnel Andreas Steffen 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 14:29:19 EDT
  • [Users] Trying RH 9 Alan Bunch 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 14:22:34 EDT
  • [Users] Microsoft clients with NAT-T "in about 2 months" Jacco de Leeuw 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 12:38:51 EDT
  • [Users] Can't ping through tunnel bobn 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 12:02:00 EDT
  • [Users] router connectivity... Shane 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 07:41:58 EDT
  • Re: [Users] ANNOUNCE: x509-1.3.1-freeswan-2.00-rc4 released Andreas Steffen 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 07:05:20 EDT
  • Re: [Users] x509 cert and RW Andreas Steffen 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 07:13:15 EDT
  • Re: [Users] x509 cert and RW II Andreas Steffen 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 05:26:38 EDT
  • [Users] x509 cert and RW karthik 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 05:18:40 EDT
  • [Users] ipsec road warrior +NAT Marek Florianczyk 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 04:35:19 EDT
  • [Users] FAQ - test tunnels (ping) Zsiros Zsolt 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 02:17:29 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Problem with RSA digital signature Mathieu Bonnet 
• Mon Apr 21 2003 - 01:35:25 EDT
  • Re: [Users] free s/wan - windows 200 Andreas Steffen 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 22:31:47 EDT
  • [Users] Is it possible to use RSA for the authentication ? Hashida 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 22:55:01 EDT
  • [Users] free s/wan - windows 200 Joachim Böddeker 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 17:07:37 EDT
  • [Users] ANNOUNCE: x509patch-0.9.28-freeswan-1.99 and x509-1.3.1-freeswan-2.00-rc2 released Andreas Steffen 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 17:17:30 EDT
  • RE: [Users] compiling kernel 2.4.18 doesn't let me create ipsec module Greg Scott 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 15:55:17 EDT
  • [Users] compiling kernel 2.4.18 doesn't let me create ipsec module Arturo Castro 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 13:42:10 EDT
  • [Users] ¡´2002¦~«×DVD¼v¤ù²M­Ü100¤¸ dvd-dvd 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 11:15:53 EDT
  • Re: [Users] cannot access ipsec remote host on external interface anymore Andreas Unterkircher 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 10:24:30 EDT
  • Re: R: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients Ken Bantoft 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 07:15:12 EDT
  • Re: [Users] multihomed gateways: access by all IPs? Walter Haidinger 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 07:09:19 EDT
  • Re: [Users] multihomed gateways: access by all IPs? Walter Haidinger 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 06:47:49 EDT
  • R: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients Francesco 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 06:22:39 EDT
  • Re: [Users] cannot access ipsec remote host on external interface anymore Christoph Haas 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 06:12:49 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Could ipsec cause this Christoph Haas 
• Sun Apr 20 2003 - 01:46:10 EDT
  • [Users] cannot access ipsec remote host on external interface anymore Andi 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 18:06:24 EDT
  • [Users] state_main_r2 Shane 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 17:02:59 EDT
  • [Users] How to send multicast over GRE/IPSec? IPSec and GRE are working Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 16:57:59 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Windows 2000 and Frees/WAN without certificates Sam Sgro 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 00:32:25 EDT
  • [Users] Could ipsec cause this philt 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 12:55:40 EDT
  • [Users] ARP Christoph Pleger 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 23:11:45 EDT
  • Re: [Users] How to send multicast over GRE/IPSec? IPSec and GRE are working Ken Bantoft 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 17:06:21 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients Sam Sgro 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 13:10:31 EDT
  • [Users] Re: ARP William Stearns 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 15:12:29 EDT
  • [Users] X.509 certificate validation? LFC - Dwayne C. Litzenberger 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 17:21:09 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Good Tunnel Bad Route Sam Sgro 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 03:44:46 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Problem with RSA digital signature Sam Sgro 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 04:46:27 EDT
  • [Users] (no subject) haitham El-Genedi 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 19:36:42 EDT
  • [Users] general freeswan question Joachim Böddeker 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 02:47:36 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients Stephen J. Bevan 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 02:48:41 EDT
  • [Users] test hgenedy 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 08:25:15 EDT
  • [Users] (no subject) Haitham 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 18:34:17 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Historical messages Christoph Haas 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 07:41:47 EDT
  • [Users] 2nd (re)connection not possible Kock Andreas 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 08:39:51 EDT
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)mail.freeswan.org 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 09:47:31 EDT
  • RE: [Users] configuration of addresses on ipsec0. Gessler Gerhard 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 12:38:22 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Windows 2000 and Frees/WAN without certificates Siew Wing Loon 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 11:07:41 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Windows 2000 and Frees/WAN without certificates joseph beasley 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 20:41:48 EDT
  • RE: [Users] 128.0.0.0/1 and 0.0.0.0/1 routing kludge Chris Teachworth 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 09:44:21 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Who updates freeswan web pages??? Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 23:58:11 EDT
  • SCAM WAS: [Users] PayPal Security check Justin Kreger 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 09:45:37 EDT
  • [Users] (no subject) Roberto Barcellona 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 22:33:07 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Host to Host PSK with Freeswan and Windows 2000/XP joseph beasley 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 20:26:56 EDT
  • [Users] GRE configuration questions. IPSec already works. Please help(Second try) Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 16:18:28 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Stuck %hold eroutes after --down and --up Christoph Haas 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 07:36:05 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients John S. Denker 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 14:11:53 EDT
  • Re: [Users] patriot swan - no 3DES or AES allowed in US? Jamin W. Collins 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 14:14:29 EDT
  • [Users] SSH Sentinel sends traffic only from behind NAT Andrew Bell 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 15:34:25 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Stuck %hold eroutes after --down and --up Ken Bantoft 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 14:54:44 EDT
  • [Users] Shared keys and other Francesco 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 15:32:44 EDT
  • Re: [Users] PayPal Security check - FRAUD ALERT Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 08:21:28 EDT
  • [Users] how to compile to have config in /etc/freeswan/ipsec.d instead of /etc/ipsec.d Cressatti, Dominique 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 17:31:51 EDT
  • [Users] GRE configuration question. Please help Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 14:24:53 EDT
  • Re: [Users] PayPal Security check Jay Thorne 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 13:47:37 EDT
  • [Users] Historical messages Jamin W. Collins 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 07:30:04 EDT
  • [Users] test Haitham Genedy 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 16:55:31 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Pre-shared NAT traversal link configuration request Diego Rivera 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 15:38:25 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Pre-shared NAT traversal link configuration request Andreas Steffen 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 07:14:28 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients Ken Bantoft 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 11:20:05 EDT
  • Re: [Users] PayPal Security check Michael T. Babcock 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 16:10:29 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Stuck %hold eroutes after --down and --up Christoph Haas 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 16:52:10 EDT
  • [Users] patriot swan - no 3DES or AES allowed in US? Peter Mueller 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 07:07:45 EDT
  • Re: [Users] FreeS/WAN Compilation Hegedis, Ervin 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 08:08:31 EDT
  • [Users] vpn in only one direcion p.uebing(at)teleconnect-service.de 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 13:40:20 EDT
  • [Users] FreeSWAN communication problem Bertrand TACHAGO 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 16:00:37 EDT
  • Re: [Users] protocol not available [blocked] Sam Sgro 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 10:21:55 EDT
  • Re: [Users] FreeSWAN communication problem Ken Bantoft 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 14:43:19 EDT
  • RE: [Users] Pre-shared NAT traversal link configuration request Diego Rivera 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 13:37:05 EDT
  • [Users] X.509, Win2k howto Diego Rivera 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 13:18:16 EDT
  • [Users] how to compile to have config in /etc/freeswan/ipsec.d instead of /etc/ipsec.d Cressatti, Dominique 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 10:17:54 EDT
  • Re: [Users] X.509, Win2k howto Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 07:32:31 EDT
  • [Users] Need a help for [ ipchains: protocol not available ] Haitham Genedy 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 14:01:03 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Problems with P12 file joseph beasley 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 08:55:05 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients Ken Bantoft 
• Sat Apr 19 2003 - 07:31:47 EDT
  • [Users] state_main_r2 Shane 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 15:32:37 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Routing between several VPN networks Matthias Henze 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 06:10:58 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients John A. Sullivan III 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 12:15:15 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Problem with superfreeswan 1.99 kb1 in one direction Wim Ceulemans 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 10:55:01 EDT
  • [Users] Connect road warrior under windows95 to gateway freeswan 1.99 Jean-Pascal DEBIEVE 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 11:45:31 EDT
  • Re: [Users] FreeS/WAN 1.99, roadwarriors, x509 certs Nels Lindquist 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 15:47:21 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Routing between several VPN networks Sam Sgro 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 06:00:06 EDT
  • [Users] (no subject) bassem ahmed 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 20:35:07 EDT
  • [Users] dns issue with freeswan philt 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 04:06:49 EDT
  • [Users] Problem with RSA digital signature Mathieu Bonnet 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 14:09:47 EDT
  • [Users] comile SFS 1.99.6.1 under Mandrake 9 Philipp Snizek 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 06:51:07 EDT
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)routerix.de 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 04:14:39 EDT
  • [Users] 128.0.0.0/1 and 0.0.0.0/1 routing kludge Chris Teachworth 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 04:17:32 EDT
  • [Users] Fragmentation problems with Windows 98 Chris Jensen 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 13:54:16 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Routing between several VPN networks Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 19:18:12 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients abretten(at)kroger.com 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 05:47:59 EDT
  • [Users] Help Haitham Genedy 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 05:36:46 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients Igmar Palsenberg 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 15:38:37 EDT
  • Re: [Users] multihomed gateways: access by all IPs? Sam Sgro 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 07:17:09 EDT
  • Re: [Users] ANNOUNCE: x509patch-0.9.27-freeswan-1.99 and x509-1.3.0-freeswan-2.00-rc2 released Andreas Steffen 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 09:22:18 EDT
  • [Users] multihomed gateways: access by all IPs? Walter Haidinger 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 10:22:39 EDT
  • [Users] close_output_pbs(&reply) ??????? roberto 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 15:27:09 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Probably simple concept but I am not sure I understand. Sam Sgro 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 15:18:34 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Please help me Sam Sgro 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 15:03:20 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Routing between several VPN networks Christoph Haas 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 13:15:11 EDT
  • Re: [Users] multihomed gateways: access by all IPs? Andreas Steffen 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 08:11:17 EDT
  • Re: [Users] X.509 certificate validation? Andreas Steffen 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 07:57:53 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Win XP problem Freeswan Andreas Steffen 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 10:46:44 EDT
  • Re: [Users] pbm with Super Frees/wan & NAT-t Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 08:41:25 EDT
  • Re[2]: [Users] ANNOUNCE: x509patch-0.9.27-freeswan-1.99 and x509-1.3.0-freeswan-2.00-rc2 released Ingo Bruell 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 08:25:46 EDT
  • RE: [Users] NAT Traversal Patch James Shroads 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 10:50:27 EDT
  • [Users] multihomed gateways: access by all IPs? Walter Haidinger 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 08:20:27 EDT
  • [Users] Routing between several VPN networks Wijnand Wiersma 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 18:13:02 EDT
  • [Users] Probably simple concept but I am not sure I understand. philt 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 14:07:54 EDT
  • [Users] Host to Host PSK with Freeswan and Windows 2000/XP Ryan Babchishin 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 13:21:36 EDT
  • [Users] Please help me Bertrand TACHAGO 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 05:57:16 EDT
  • [Users] pbm with Super Frees/wan & NAT-t Gérard Corbehem 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 11:07:50 EDT
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)mail.freeswan.org 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 06:14:15 EDT
  • RE: [Users] NAT Traversal Patch Christoph Keppner 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 12:53:55 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Who updates freeswan web pages??? Sam Sgro 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 11:10:23 EDT
  • Re: [Users] ANNOUNCE: x509patch-0.9.27-freeswan-1.99 and x509-1.3.0-freeswan-2.00-rc2 released Ingo Bruell 
• Fri Apr 18 2003 - 05:15:30 EDT
  • Re: [Users] strange connection problem Christoph Haas 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 09:56:06 EDT
  • [Users] protocol not available [blocked] Haitham Genedy 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 04:36:49 EDT
  • [Users] Help Haitham Genedy 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 12:05:23 EDT
  • [Users] IPSec VPN is up, GRE won't tunnel, where am I wrong here? Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 10:56:53 EDT
  • [Users] bintec router's & freeswan/X509 howto Matthias Henze 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 03:56:26 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Manual keying setup problem Alberto Ferrante 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 13:56:36 EDT
  • Re: [Users] SUSE 8.0 Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 13:54:48 EDT
  • [Users] Re: IPSec VPN is up, GRE won't tunnel, where am I wrong here? Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 13:07:18 EDT
  • [Users] Win XP problem Freeswan Johnny Gonzalez Dominguez 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 03:37:26 EDT
  • [Users] strange connection problem Matthias Henze 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 02:45:21 EDT
  • Re: [Users] SUSE 8.0 Matthias Henze 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 04:01:48 EDT
  • Re: [Users] SUSE 8.0 list(at)fsenetwork.com 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 14:40:03 EDT
  • [Users] X.509 certificate validation? LFC - Dwayne C. Litzenberger 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 19:35:35 EDT
  • [Users] FreeS/WAN Compilation Adam W 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 22:59:37 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Manual keying setup problem Stephen J. Bevan 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 21:37:54 EDT
  • [Users] Re: Win XP problem Freeswan Mark van Proctor 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 20:47:58 EDT
  • [Users] FreeS/WAN Compilation Adam W 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 12:37:25 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Manual keying setup problem Alberto Ferrante 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 20:10:20 EDT
  • RE: [Users] NAT Traversal Patch John A. Sullivan III 
• Thu Apr 17 2003 - 00:58:24 EDT
  • [Users] How to bind GRE0 to a tunnel? Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 19:23:37 EDT
  • [Users] FreeS/WAN Compilation Adam W 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 19:10:32 EDT
  • RE: [Users] FreeS/WAN with Win2k Adam W 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 17:54:50 EDT
  • [Users] IPSec Compression With Cisco Colin Chester 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 18:28:16 EDT
  • [Users] Good Tunnel Bad Route David Colwell 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 18:08:59 EDT
  • [Users] difference between reply packet and rbody roberto 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 19:51:11 EDT
  • [Users] Who is using compression? Wolfgang Tolkien 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 17:36:48 EDT
  • [Users] NAT Traversal using Non-FreeS/WAN clients Diego Rivera 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 16:44:27 EDT
  • [Users] Windows 2000 and Frees/WAN without certificates Marcelo Rosa 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 17:31:52 EDT
  • Re: [Users] SUSE 8.0 Sam Sgro 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 12:02:35 EDT
  • Re: [Users] FreeS/WAN with Win2k Andreas Steffen 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 19:38:33 EDT
  • [Users] SUSE 8.0 David López 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 02:03:49 EDT
  • [Users] Who updates freeswan web pages??? Izzy Blacklock 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 02:47:30 EDT
  • [Users] Virtual IP addresses with FreeS/WAN Christoph Pleger 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 05:56:51 EDT
  • [Users] FreeS/WAN with Win2k Adam W 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 02:38:19 EDT
  • [Users] (re)connection not possible Stephen J. Bevan 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 23:25:52 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT Traversal Patch Daniel Djamaludin 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 09:11:02 EDT
  • [Users] IPSec without authentification Esteban 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 02:42:36 EDT
  • [Users] nat traversal Stephen J. Bevan 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 01:34:32 EDT
  • Re: [Users] 128.0.0.0/1 and 0.0.0.0/1 routing kludge Andreas Steffen 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 01:12:18 EDT
  • Re: [Users] (re)connection not possible Sam Sgro 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 00:10:07 EDT
  • [Users] Kaplan Colleges Home feedback 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 02:11:11 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT Traversal Patch John A. Sullivan III 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 02:57:33 EDT
  • [Users] Manual keying setup problem Stephen J. Bevan 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 02:21:29 EDT
  • Re: [Users] dhcp over ipsec John A. Sullivan III 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 04:21:21 EDT
  • [Users] Files required by freeswan frank.herzog(at)dhp-gmbh.de 
• Wed Apr 16 2003 - 03:19:46 EDT
  • [Users] Returned mail--"japanese lass' sexy pictures" postmaster 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 09:38:40 EDT
  • [Users] Re: Users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 126095 Christoph Pleger 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 08:59:36 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Multicast over VPN? How. Already have IPSec running between sites. Josdeyvi Russi 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 09:14:07 EDT
  • [Users] dhcp over ipsec Alexandra Navarro 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 09:36:18 EDT
  • Re: [Users] no RSA public key Andreas Steffen 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 08:46:05 EDT
  • [Users] NAT Traversal Patch Christoph Keppner 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 19:13:14 EDT
  • [Users] 128.0.0.0/1 and 0.0.0.0/1 routing kludge Chris Teachworth 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 09:20:53 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Multicast over VPN? How. Already have IPSec running between sites. Ken Bantoft 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 18:47:00 EDT
  • Re: [Users] problem about nat_t and leftnexthop Daniel Djamaludin 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 18:39:22 EDT
  • Re: [Users] retransmit in PLUTO... Daniel Djamaludin 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 08:33:29 EDT
  • [Users] (re)connection not possible Kock Andreas 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 06:38:36 EDT
  • [Users] no RSA public key Rota Szabolcs 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 06:01:34 EDT
  • [Users] no RSA public key Róta Szabolcs 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 05:01:00 EDT
  • [Users] Manual keying setup problem Alberto Ferrante 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 04:46:32 EDT
  • [Users] IP fragmentation problem... Izzy Blacklock 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 04:57:12 EDT
  • [Users] retransmit in PLUTO... Phil Joo 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 23:36:49 EDT
  • [Users] problem about nat_t and leftnexthop chejw 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 01:04:43 EDT
  • Re: [Users] FreeS/WAN 1.99, roadwarriors, x509 certs Andreas Steffen 
• Tue Apr 15 2003 - 03:47:30 EDT
  • [Users] Problem with superfreeswan 1.99 kb1 in one direction Wim Ceulemans 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 22:22:40 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Upgrading from 1.91 to 1.99 Ken Bantoft 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 21:48:42 EDT
  • [Users] Upgrading from 1.91 to 1.99 Mark Smith 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 20:54:50 EDT
  • [Users] nat traversal Marcel Beltz 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 19:40:00 EDT
  • [Users] FreeS/WAN 1.99, roadwarriors, x509 certs Nels Lindquist 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 19:06:22 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Multicast over VPN? How. Already have IPSec running between sites. Ken Bantoft 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 15:01:01 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Connection between road warrior using freeswan and OpenBSD gatewa y Thorsten Wandersmann 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 17:01:07 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Possible problem? Christoph Haas 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 15:36:10 EDT
  • [Users] Multicast over VPN? How. Already have IPSec running between sites. Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 16:09:59 EDT
  • Re: [Users] FreeS/WAN 1.98b, Win2K, and X.509 certs Andreas Steffen 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 14:10:24 EDT
  • [Users] Pre-shared NAT traversal link configuration request tangovi(at)netscape.net 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 14:37:52 EDT
  • [Users] win xp behind nat? Marcel Beltz 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 14:17:26 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Multiple ipsec interface routing problem Sam Sgro 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 14:43:14 EDT
  • [Users] kbuild error coUnt3r(at)gmx.net 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 14:03:16 EDT
  • [Users] FreeS/WAN 1.98b, Win2K, and X.509 certs Diego Rivera 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 12:47:00 EDT
  • [Users] Data transferring problem. Bertrand TACHAGO 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 13:17:55 EDT
  • [Users] Re: X-AUTH patch? Ken Bantoft 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 12:01:04 EDT
  • [Users] Multiple ipsec interface routing problem Andy Loukes 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 09:05:15 EDT
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)mail.freeswan.org 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 10:09:02 EDT
  • Re: [Users] "preshared-key": cannot initiate connection without knowing peer IP address Christoph Haas 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 09:39:50 EDT
  • [Users] newbie help Tech info 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 07:57:06 EDT
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)mail.freeswan.org 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 07:38:19 EDT
  • [Users] Possible problem? Cristian Gabor 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 07:50:17 EDT
  • [Users] Connection between road warrior using freeswan and OpenBSD gatewa y André April 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 07:31:12 EDT
  • [Users] Freeswan + SSH Sentinel Alexandra Navarro 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 07:25:33 EDT
  • [Users] Re: Fragmentation problem Peter Osterberg 
• Sun Apr 13 2003 - 20:19:05 EDT
  • [Users] Authentication by public key encryption in frees/wan 1.99 Hashida 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 03:34:42 EDT
  • [Users] Look,my beautiful girl friend claudia 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 03:22:46 EDT
  • Re: [Users] 'ipsec' shell script problems EDV - WHW (Goesta Smekal) 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 05:40:41 EDT
  • [Users] Fragmentation problem Peter Osterberg 
• Sun Apr 13 2003 - 18:20:52 EDT
  • [Users] Query with Preshared Keys and Certificates Mark Smith 
• Mon Apr 14 2003 - 01:22:21 EDT
  • [Users] "preshared-key": cannot initiate connection without knowing peer IP address tian.xuenong.ZTE_LTD(at)zte.com.cn 
• Sun Apr 13 2003 - 17:33:43 EDT
  • [Users] ipsec conft fields defined Norris Ward 
• Sun Apr 13 2003 - 23:31:41 EDT
  • [Users] ESP go past output chain Andrey V. Glukhov 
• Sun Apr 13 2003 - 16:46:13 EDT
  • [Users] Removal Notice From Promo Daily Promo Daily 
• Sat Apr 12 2003 - 17:45:01 EDT
  • [Users] road warrior problem! Martin Radosta 
• Sat Apr 12 2003 - 17:44:59 EDT
  • [Users] road warrior problem! Martin Radosta 
• Sat Apr 12 2003 - 19:35:57 EDT
  • Re: [Users] help with roadwarrior from XP to freeswan 1.99 Michael Perry 
• Sat Apr 12 2003 - 05:56:06 EDT
  • Re: [Users] winXPpro and freeswan Alexandra Navarro 
• Sat Apr 12 2003 - 05:08:43 EDT
  • [Users] freeswan + ipsec.exe win2k julien Touche 
• Sat Apr 12 2003 - 05:29:21 EDT
  • Re: [Users] help with roadwarrior from XP to freeswan 1.99 Andreas Steffen 
• Sat Apr 12 2003 - 05:24:09 EDT
  • Re: [Users] winXPpro and freeswan Andreas Steffen 
• Sat Apr 12 2003 - 03:21:35 EDT
  • [Users] help with roadwarrior from XP to freeswan 1.99 Michael Perry 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:25:18 EDT
  • Re: [Users] IPSEC event shuts down interface Ralph Blach 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 18:15:16 EDT
  • [Users] NAT Linksys and XP how? James Miller 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 16:53:58 EDT
  • [Users] how to unsubscribe from this mailinglist ? Radijove Todorovic 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 14:02:02 EDT
  • [Users] Further RW problems (was: Win2K/XP to FreeS/WAN interoperability problems) Nels Lindquist 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 14:21:16 EDT
  • Re: [Users] 'ipsec' shell script problems Sam Sgro 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 13:44:03 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Trying to Upgrade my 1.98b to 1.99 Sam Sgro 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 13:32:42 EDT
  • [Users] (no subject) Chris Teachworth 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:41:24 EDT
  • [Users] winXPpro and freeswan Alexandra Navarro 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 13:51:42 EDT
  • Re: [Users] IPSEC event shuts down interface Sam Sgro 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 13:01:20 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Win2K/XP to FreeS/WAN interoperability problems Nels Lindquist 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:10:12 EDT
  • [Users] winXPpro and freeswan Alexandra Navarro 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 13:12:21 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Trying to Upgrade my 1.98b to 1.99 Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:49:33 EDT
  • [Users] New Version of the Windows 2000 IPSecTool (vpn.ebootis.de) !! Müller, Marcus 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:39:12 EDT
  • [Users] Re: Yet another Win2k question Jason McClean 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:07:30 EDT
  • [Users] NAT weirdness Rupert Weber-Henschel 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 11:41:07 EDT
  • [Users] Trying to Upgrade my 1.98b to 1.99 George Gallen 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 09:40:03 EDT
  • Re: [Users] DHCP over IPSEC Andreas Steffen 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 05:33:55 EDT
  • [Users] Yet another Win2k question Jason McClean 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 10:19:30 EDT
  • [Users] IPSEC event shuts down interface Ralph Blach 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 08:31:32 EDT
  • Re: [Users] confuse about the tcpdump result Andreas Steffen 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 09:43:07 EDT
  • [Users] yŒƒˆÀzƒuƒ‰ƒ“ƒhŽžŒvEBagy1/100‚Ì“Á‰¿z gekiyasu 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 08:11:34 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Stuck %hold eroutes after --down and --up Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 07:45:15 EDT
  • Re: [Users] confuse about the tcpdump result Christoph Haas 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 08:13:02 EDT
  • RE: [Users] Re: Updating Freeswan in Debian Linux Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 08:09:12 EDT
  • Re: [Users] NAT-Traversal patch: [disabled] Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 07:27:30 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Tunnel is stuck at STATE_MAIN_I1 after one peer bounced (solved!) Christoph Haas 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 08:45:06 EDT
  • [Users] DHCP over IPSEC Glatzel Tino 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 06:20:18 EDT
  • Re: [Users] confuse about the tcpdump result Andreas Steffen 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 06:09:36 EDT
  • [Users] 'ipsec' shell script problems EDV - WHW (Goesta Smekal) 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 05:29:41 EDT
  • RE: [Users] confuse about the tcpdump result Florian Maier 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 04:51:08 EDT
  • RE: [Users] Re: Updating Freeswan in Debian Linux Christoph Keppner 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 03:13:13 EDT
  • [Users] confuse about the tcpdump result Calvin 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 03:53:11 EDT
  • [Users] Réf. : [Users] NAT-Traversal patch: [disabled] mlafon(at)arkoon.net 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 02:47:54 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Stuck %hold eroutes after --down and --up Christoph Haas 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 01:03:59 EDT
  • [Users] NAT-Traversal patch: [disabled] Jarle Aase 
• Fri Apr 11 2003 - 00:29:50 EDT
  • [Users] ÍƼö£ºËÄÍò¶àÊ׸èÇúÃâ·ÑµÈÄãÀ´Ìý qp 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 22:00:34 EDT
  • [Users] Stuck %hold eroutes after --down and --up Stephen J. Bevan 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 21:53:58 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Stuck %hold eroutes after --down and --up Ken Bantoft 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 18:22:16 EDT
  • [Users] Inkjet & Laser Toner Cartridges ~ Save upto 89% Zoey 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 19:19:41 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Re: Updating Freeswan in Debian Linux Christoph Haas 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 19:27:39 EDT
  • [Users] Stuck %hold eroutes after --down and --up Christoph Haas 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 17:23:10 EDT
  • [Users] BrightPlanet's Deep Query Manager Bradley D. Melstad 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 16:30:46 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Help ! trying to run Freeswan and MPLS on the same box Ken Bantoft 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 15:23:24 EDT
  • [Users] Help ! trying to run Freeswan and MPLS on the same box Murthy S. Andukuri 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 13:15:53 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Win2K/XP to FreeS/WAN interoperability problems Nels Lindquist 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 12:17:32 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Win2K/XP to FreeS/WAN interoperability problems Nate Carlson 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 11:40:58 EDT
  • RE: [Users] Re: Updating Freeswan in Debian Linux Christoph Keppner 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 12:11:40 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Win2k + FreeSWAN interop joseph beasley 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 09:59:55 EDT
  • [Users] Re: Updating Freeswan in Debian Linux Andreas Steffen 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 08:37:19 EDT
  • [Users] RE: Movian to Freeswan Bruno Grossmann 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 07:54:26 EDT
  • [Users] Updating Freeswan in Debian Linux Christoph Keppner 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 07:38:23 EDT
  • Re: [Users] ANNOUNCE: x509patch-0.9.27-freeswan-1.99 and x509-1.3.0-freeswan-2.00-rc2 released John A. Sullivan III 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 09:11:42 EDT
  • [Users] Routing problem Esteban 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 07:35:55 EDT
  • [Users] $BL$>5Bz9-9p"(!!AGE($J=P2q$$(B B 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 05:33:04 EDT
  • Re: [Users] ANNOUNCE: x509patch-0.9.27-freeswan-1.99 and x509-1.3.0-freeswan-2.00-rc2 released Andreas Steffen 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 05:05:52 EDT
  • RE: [Users] configuration of addresses on ipsec0. Kaustubh Kumbhalkar 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 05:55:37 EDT
  • RE: [Users] addresses not being configured on eth0 Gessler Gerhard 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 05:19:27 EDT
  • RE: [Users] configuration of addresses on ipsec0. Gessler Gerhard 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 05:03:58 EDT
  • RE: [Users] addresses not being configured on eth0 Gessler Gerhard 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 04:39:17 EDT
  • [Users] unequal ip address on ppp0 and ipsec0 Nicolas Cedraschi 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 05:02:00 EDT
  • RE: [Users] configuration of addresses on ipsec0. Gessler Gerhard 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 05:09:46 EDT
  • [Users] Router as a Client for FreeS/Wan Berlinger Patrick 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 04:07:28 EDT
  • AW: [Users] use of 2 interfaces for ipsec Philipp Snizek 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 03:56:09 EDT
  • [Users] use of 2 interfaces for ipsec kibeki 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 03:32:57 EDT
  • [Users] use of 2 interfaces for ipsec kibeki 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 03:14:18 EDT
  • [Users] use of 2 interfaces for ipsec kibeki 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 02:12:50 EDT
  • [Users] addresses not being configured on eth0 Kaustubh Kumbhalkar 
• Thu Apr 10 2003 - 01:05:49 EDT
  • [Users] ÍƼö£¬ËÄÍò¶àÊ׸èÇúÃâ·ÑµÈÄãÀ´Ìý qp 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 20:58:46 EDT
  • [Users] about the connection between win2000 and freeswan tian.xuenong.ZTE_LTD(at)zte.com.cn 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 20:33:09 EDT
  • Re: [Users] security level Daniel Djamaludin 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 19:46:01 EDT
  • Re: [Users] security level Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 19:25:17 EDT
  • Re: [Users] ANNOUNCE: x509patch-0.9.27-freeswan-1.99 and x509-1.3.0-freeswan-2.00-rc2 released John A. Sullivan III 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 12:27:23 EDT
  • [Users] security level Santos Alvarez, Mauricio 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 17:34:52 EDT
  • [Users] ANNOUNCE: x509patch-0.9.27-freeswan-1.99 and x509-1.3.0-freeswan-2.00-rc2 released Andreas Steffen 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 11:44:30 EDT
  • [Users] Win2k + FreeSWAN interop Ollie Gallardo 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 12:47:03 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Win2K/XP to FreeS/WAN interoperability problems Nels Lindquist 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 12:02:18 EDT
  • [Users] Re: Grrr...sfs is %holding my packets! Ken Bantoft 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 10:57:29 EDT
  • Re: [Users] dhcp over ipsec John A. Sullivan III 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 07:53:41 EDT
  • Re: [Users] status 7 error on Gentoo using FreeS/WAN Jason McCormick 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 08:03:24 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Mail relaying from roadwarrior Ola Albertsson 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 07:32:50 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Making freeswan not encrypt? Giacomo Mulas 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 06:27:30 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Win2K/XP to FreeS/WAN interoperability problems Juergen R. Plasser 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 06:02:22 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Making freeswan not encrypt? John S. Denker 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 05:11:04 EDT
  • [Users] win2k/win xp clients Fred de Klein 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 05:00:59 EDT
  • [Users] incomplete ISAKMP SA Pierrick LE FOL 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 03:10:53 EDT
  • [Users] dhcp over ipsec John Sweeney 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 03:40:23 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Making freeswan not encrypt? Giacomo Mulas 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 01:54:29 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Win2K/XP to FreeS/WAN interoperability problems Claus Rosenberger 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 02:36:14 EDT
  • [Users] about the connection between win2000 and freeswan tian.xuenong.ZTE_LTD(at)zte.com.cn 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 01:03:26 EDT
  • [Users] configuration of addresses on ipsec0. Kaustubh Kumbhalkar 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 23:25:39 EDT
  • [Users] about the connection between win2000 and freeswan tian.xuenong.ZTE_LTD(at)zte.com.cn 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 01:04:53 EDT
  • [Users] ÍƼö£¬ËÄÍò¶àÊ׸èÇúÃâ·ÑµÈÄãÀ´Ìý qp 
• Wed Apr 09 2003 - 00:37:39 EDT
  • Re: [Users] status 7 error on Gentoo using FreeS/WAN Daniel Djamaludin 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 20:37:48 EDT
  • re: Re: [Users] about the connection between win2000 and freeswan tian.xuenong(at)zte.com.cn 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 22:09:29 EDT
  • [Users] status 7 error on Gentoo using FreeS/WAN Jason McCormick 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 21:15:23 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Allowing any ipsec client through my public hotspot router Daniel Djamaludin 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 20:28:46 EDT
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)mail.freeswan.org 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 20:15:20 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Certificate based dynamic tunnel configuration John A. Sullivan III 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 20:37:16 EDT
  • [Users] Problem with tunnels between FW-1 and FreeS/WAN John Neil 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 19:42:58 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Making freeswan not encrypt? Ken Bantoft 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 06:50:51 EDT
  • [Users] Authentication by public key encryption Hashida 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 10:11:37 EDT
  • [Users] Routing with FreeS/Wan Nicolas GRIMLER 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 17:52:24 EDT
  • [Users] Your password infolex 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 17:55:08 EDT
  • [Users] Certificate based dynamic tunnel configuration NAGY Andras 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 07:15:36 EDT
  • Re: [Users] how to make ipsec.o module (X.509 patch) Andreas Steffen 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 16:47:08 EDT
  • [Users] vpn + ip ALEXANDRE.FANZERES(at)blnet.com 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 20:23:36 EDT
  • [Users] how to make ipsec.o module (X.509 patch) arturo.castro(at)hostingpymes.net 
• Tue Apr 08 2003 - 15:02:31 EDT
  • [Users] Making freeswan not encrypt? Dan V 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 20:23:29 EDT
  • [Users] how to make ipsec.o module (X.509 patch) arturo.castro(at)hostingpymes.net 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 19:45:51 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Mail relaying from roadwarrior Nels Lindquist 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 19:27:24 EDT
  • [Users] Win2K/XP to FreeS/WAN interoperability problems Nels Lindquist 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 17:16:01 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Need some Help Sam Sgro 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 17:36:45 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Need some Help John S. Denker 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 13:57:37 EDT
  • [Users] Need some Help ALEXANDRE.FANZERES(at)blnet.com 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 12:18:18 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Help with FreeS/WAN and Windows XP Juergen R. Plasser 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 08:34:04 EDT
  • AW: AW: [Users] esp in udp Philipp Snizek 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 08:41:07 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Interoperability problem, 1.99 vs. Sonicwall - DH5/MODP1536 in IKE but not in ESP JuanJo Ciarlante 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 10:47:16 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Help with FreeS/WAN and Windows XP Andreas Steffen 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 08:29:32 EDT
  • Re: [Users] freeswan 2.00 - "eroute: pfkey write failed, returning -1 with errno=22" Ken Bantoft 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 08:40:00 EDT
  • [Users] Help with FreeS/WAN and Windows XP Marc Meessen 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 08:42:29 EDT
  • Re: AW: AW: [Users] esp in udp Ken Bantoft 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 07:29:56 EDT
  • AW: [Users] esp in udp Philipp Snizek 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 08:09:48 EDT
  • Re: AW: [Users] esp in udp Ken Bantoft 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 07:26:04 EDT
  • Re: [Users] esp in udp Ken Bantoft 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 05:37:11 EDT
  • [Users] esp in udp Philipp Snizek 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 05:11:34 EDT
  • Re: [Users] nat traversal problem mlafon(at)arkoon.net 
• Mon Apr 07 2003 - 02:24:48 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Problem with DLINK DI-804V System Administrator 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 21:03:26 EDT
  • RE: [Users] Re: Regarding your inquiry Charlie 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 22:50:53 EDT
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)mail.freeswan.org 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 21:19:28 EDT
  • [Users] ssh sentinel could not connect between linksys befsr41 to freeswan with nat-t Rifath Nawaz 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 21:18:34 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Contivity clent emulaton: Is that real? blanch9(at)attglobal.net 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 21:29:10 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Contivity clent emulaton: Is that real? Ken Bantoft 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 20:45:25 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Contivity clent emulaton: Is that real? Ken Bantoft 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 20:24:31 EDT
  • [Users] Topmargin madrerafols77 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 20:51:35 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Contivity clent emulaton: Is that real? Ken Bantoft 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 19:26:01 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Contivity clent emulaton: Is that real? blanch9(at)attglobal.net 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 19:57:55 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Contivity clent emulaton: Is that real? G. Georgiev 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 19:14:08 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Contivity clent emulaton: Is that real? Ken Bantoft 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 19:06:32 EDT
  • Re: [Users] freeswan 2.00 - "eroute: pfkey write failed, returning -1 with errno=22" Ken Bantoft 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 19:04:52 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Contivity clent emulaton: Is that real? Ken Bantoft 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 19:09:11 EDT
  • [Users] Re: Regarding your inquiry Franklin E. Leming 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 17:53:17 EDT
  • Re: [Users] site-to-site VPN with NAT on both sides HVE 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 17:09:51 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Contivity clent emulaton: Is that real? blanch9(at)attglobal.net 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 17:11:44 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Contivity clent emulaton: Is that real? Alex Pankratov 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 17:02:47 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Multiple keys Hegedus, Ervin 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 16:26:40 EDT
  • [Users] freeswan 2.00 - "eroute: pfkey write failed, returning -1 with errno=22" Thorsten Haas 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 15:20:00 EDT
  • Re: [Users] PC in the subnet must be Linux box? Sam Sgro 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 15:25:53 EDT
  • [Users] Contivity clent emulaton: Is that real? G. Georgiev 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 12:14:54 EDT
  • Re: [Users] ANNOUNCE: Patriot S/WAN 1.0 Released! Michael H. Warfield 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 10:08:30 EDT
  • Re: AW: [Users] road warrior & ipsec passthrough gateways Andreas Steffen 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 09:51:28 EDT
  • AW: [Users] road warrior & ipsec passthrough gateways Philipp Snizek 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 09:08:13 EDT
  • Re: [Users] road warrior & ipsec passthrough gateways Andreas Steffen 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 09:03:17 EDT
  • Re: [Users] northgate-southnet connection hardly works Andreas Steffen 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 09:21:59 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Multiple keys Andreas Steffen 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 09:16:44 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Road warrior negotiation Problem Andreas Steffen 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 08:45:39 EDT
  • [Users] Re: Freeswan "rightca" to interoperate with Cisco [X.509] Andreas Steffen 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 08:07:45 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Any particular router daemons best. Ken Bantoft 
• Tue Apr 01 2003 - 01:27:56 EST
  • [Users] AW: [sfs-dev] ANNOUNCE: Patriot S/WAN 1.0 Released! Pascal C. Kocher 
• Sat Apr 05 2003 - 15:22:44 EST
  • [Users] Mail relaying from roadwarrior David A. De Graaf 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 05:27:58 EDT
  • Re: [Users] ANNOUNCE: Patriot S/WAN 1.0 Released! Ralf G. R. Bergs 
• Tue Apr 01 2003 - 01:17:10 EST
  • [Users] road warrior & ipsec passthrough gateways Philipp Snizek 
• Tue Apr 01 2003 - 01:10:58 EST
  • [Users] Re: [sfs-dev] ANNOUNCE: Patriot S/WAN 1.0 Released! Andreas Steffen 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 03:40:06 EDT
  • Re: [Users] Interoperability problem, 1.99 vs. Sonicwall - DH5/MODP1536 in IKE but not in ESP John D. Hardin 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 04:40:07 EDT
  • [Users] Multiple keys Hegedus, Ervin 
• Tue Apr 01 2003 - 00:45:46 EST
  • [Users] Any particular router daemons best. Phil Troyer 
• Wed Apr 02 2003 - 17:01:28 EST
  • [Users] site-to-site VPN with NAT on both sides HVE 
• Tue Apr 01 2003 - 13:56:34 EST
  • [Users] Roadwarrior mail relaying David A. De Graaf 
• Tue Apr 01 2003 - 00:00:15 EST
  • [Users] ANNOUNCE: Patriot S/WAN 1.0 Released! Ken Bantoft 
• Tue Apr 01 2003 - 04:40:09 EST
  • [Users] Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator and Freeswan Himalay Gopu 
• Tue Apr 01 2003 - 04:59:48 EST
  • Re: [Users] northgate-southnet connection hardly works Christoph Haas 
• Wed Apr 02 2003 - 11:55:31 EST
  • [Users] Interoperability problem, 1.99 vs. Sonicwall - DH5/MODP1536 in IKE but not in ESP John D. Hardin 
• Sat Apr 05 2003 - 18:43:48 EST
  • Re: [Users] Interoperability problem, 1.99 vs. Sonicwall - DH5/MODP1536 in IKE but not in ESP Ken Bantoft 
• Sun Apr 06 2003 - 00:16:40 EST
  • [Users] ÕŹúÈÙ¾«Ñ¡µçÓ°ÏÂÔØ movie 
• Sat Apr 05 2003 - 19:19:45 EST
  • [Users] Road warrior negotiation Problem Martin Radosta 
• Sat Apr 05 2003 - 13:11:43 EST
  • Re: [Users] 1.99, Nortel Contivity, notify/discard patch Ken Bantoft 
• Thu Apr 03 2003 - 13:11:31 EST
  • [Users] Think ive slipped up with generating certificates.... Andy Welch 
• Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:44:59 EST
  • Re: [Users] win2k&freeswan Peter Dolloff 
• Thu Apr 03 2003 - 06:41:20 EST
  • [Users] test - please ignore Gessler Gerhard 
• Sat Apr 05 2003 - 11:18:36 EST
  • Re: [Users] Freeswan "rightca" to interoperate with Cisco [X.509] Edward Martinson 
• Thu Apr 03 2003 - 12:14:38 EST
  • [Users] nat traversal problem ³µ½¨ÎÄ 
• Tue Apr 01 2003 - 04:35:48 EST
  • [Users] What happend to the briefs list? Friedrich Lobenstock 
• Sat Apr 05 2003 - 04:29:58 EST
  • Re: [Users] Problems moving from 1.97 to 1.99 Andreas Steffen 
• Tue Apr 01 2003 - 06:25:21 EST
  • [Users] FreeS/WAN drops packets Piotr Nitkiewicz 
• Sat Apr 05 2003 - 02:55:14 EST
  • [Users] PC in the subnet must be Linux box? Chun Wai YIP 
• Sat Apr 05 2003 - 04:10:36 EST
  • [Users] now connection established - but I can't ping (was: Trouble with freeswan/x.509 and Safenet's SoftremoteLT) Thomas Koenig 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 21:27:34 EST
  • [Users] Win2K/XP & FreeS/WAN inconsistency Nels Lindquist 
• Sat Apr 05 2003 - 06:30:54 EST
  • [Users] Can I connect multiple subnets via one ipsec tunnel? Krause 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 22:57:00 EST
  • Re: [Users] Freeswan "rightca" to interoperate with Cisco [X.509] Edward Martinson 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 22:25:40 EST
  • Re: [Users] %hold/%trap problem Sam Sgro 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 20:33:15 EST
  • Re: [Users] help on getting connection up Sam Sgro 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 18:46:14 EST
  • Re: [Users] Problems moving from 1.97 to 1.99 Intelligent Dynamic 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 20:18:39 EST
  • Re: [Users] VPN good - internet routing bad Sam Sgro 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 20:04:05 EST
  • [Users] ÕŹúÈÙ¾«Ñ¡µçÓ°ÏÂÔØ movie 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 17:57:09 EST
  • [Users] Problems moving from 1.97 to 1.99 Michael Kraus 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 14:17:24 EST
  • Re: [Users] Troble with freeswan/x.509 and Safenet's SoftremoteLT Andreas Steffen 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 09:37:49 EST
  • Re: [Users] Problems moving from 1.97 to 1.99 Andreas Steffen 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 14:39:21 EST
  • [Users] Users list is ok, but other lists " design" and "bug" are not Haitham 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 14:57:07 EST
  • Re: [Users] Windows 98 Domain Login Behind VPN Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 10:54:04 EST
  • Re: [Users] WAR CRIME Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 11:26:32 EST
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)routerix.de 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 15:30:54 EST
  • [Users] Freeswan "rightca" to interoperate with Cisco [X.509] Pappas, Tony 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 02:25:06 EST
  • Re: [Users] help on getting connection up philt 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 17:54:51 EST
  • [Users] Re: FreeS/WAN compilation problem Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 16:00:26 EST
  • Re: [Users] Troble with freeswan/x.509 and Safenet's SoftremoteLT John A. Sullivan III 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 16:30:49 EST
  • [Users] site-to-site VPN with NAT on both sides HVE 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 12:00:04 EST
  • [Users] VPN good - internet routing bad Clay Stuckey 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 14:54:19 EST
  • Re: [Users] Troble with freeswan/x.509 and Safenet's SoftremoteLT Ken Bantoft 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 14:19:56 EST
  • [Users] a compiled updown Pawe³ Krawczyk 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 13:31:35 EST
  • [Users] VPN good - web surfing bad Clay Stuckey 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 12:08:18 EST
  • [Users] Windows 98 Domain Login Behind VPN Dave Waller 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 13:39:00 EST
  • [Users] Re: Troble with freeswan/x.509 and Safenet's SoftremoteLT thomas 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 13:11:29 EST
  • RE: [Users] WAR CRIME Simpson, Doug 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 12:29:17 EST
  • [Users] Troble with freeswan/x.509 and Safenet's SoftremoteLT thomas 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 08:14:06 EST
  • Re: [Users] trap 0 Andreas Steffen 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 09:11:13 EST
  • Re: [Users] WAR CRIME Ian Hunter 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 07:30:29 EST
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)mail.freeswan.org 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 07:57:21 EST
  • RE: [Users] WAR CRIME Chris Ehlers 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 07:16:45 EST
  • Re: [Users] client<->nw: conn establishes,packets vanish at vpn server Christian Kirbach 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 08:26:19 EST
  • [Users] Problems moving from 1.97 to 1.99 Michael Kraus 
• Tue Apr 01 2003 - 03:58:49 EST
  • [Users] IPSec Connection between to NATed Gateways Christoph Keppner 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 05:32:17 EST
  • [Users] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken. Administrator(at)mail.freeswan.org 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 05:50:45 EST
  • RE: [Users] WAR CRIME Phil 
• Fri Apr 04 2003 - 07:55:19