|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Geographic math problem
From: David T. Ashley <dashley(at)gmail.com>
Date: Thu Jun 28 2007 - 18:25:16 EDT
The math of latitude and longitude ain't too bad. Consulting a globe would help. A degree of latitude is always the same size in terms of the distance along the earth's surface. However, a degree of longitude varies in size--longest at the equator and shortest (actually zero) at the poles. The defining equations come from that. Just a few notes: a)Whatever equations you derive for the corners may break down if the area includes either pole. You will need to guard against that. b)My gut tells me that you can come up with some very simple approximations (sine of this times cosine of that or dimension of the square) that will work so long as the dimensions of the square are much smaller than the diameter of the earth and you're not working too close to the poles. However, if you mark up a spherical surface (such as a basketball or beachball), I think you'll see that the relationships if either of those assumptions break down would have to go to higher-order equations and wouldn't be so simple, even if they can be represented in closed form. If you want the exact relationships (which I don't believe are in the URLs cited), you should probably post to sci.math. Dave. Received on Thu Jun 28 18:26:18 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 28 2007 - 18:30:03 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||