Hi Alex,
we have another replication setup, i just checked that "Read_Master_Log_Pos"
and "exec_master_log_pos" has the same value.
regards
anandkl
On 7/9/07, Alex Arul Lurthu <alex.lurthu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You will be taking a chance if you use Read_Master_Log_Pos: 106683511. It > is not guaranteed that whatever is read from master is definitely > applied. The apply of the read sqls might have stopped somewhere and in that > case Read_Master_Log_Pos and exec_master_log_pos might be different. > > -- > Thanks > Alex > http://blog.360.yahoo.com/alex.lurthu > > On 7/9/07, Ananda Kumar <anandkl@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Alex, > > Thanks a lot, > > I missed on taking the "exe_master_log position" value. > > If i start from Read_Master_Log_Pos: 106683511, will it cause any harm. > > > > regards > > anandkl > > > > > > > > On 7/9/07, Alex Arul Lurthu <alex.lurthu@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > > > Anand, > > > > > > If the dump was taken from the slave then the binlog positions that > > > were dumped out are that of the slave. Now you might do 2 things : > > > > > > 1. Setup a slave of your master > > > > > > To do this use the binlog positions that you obtained using the > > > command show slave status on your slave. The master log file will be " > > > mysql-bin.000029" . But your show slave output status doesnt show the > > > exe_master_log position. You need to use that position for setting up a new > > > slave of your master. > > > > > > 2. Setup a slave of your slave > > > > > > To do this use the binglog positions in your mysqldump output. > > > > > > P.S: Make sure you setup the hostnames in the change master command > > > appropriately. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks > > > Alex > > > http://blog.360.yahoo.com/alex.lurthu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Received on Mon Jul 9 01:42:03 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Tue Jul 10 2007 - 21:34:33 EDT
|