|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Distro packaging decisions and the non-public Enterprise source
From: Michael Shigorin <mike(at)osdn.org.ua>
Date: Tue Sep 18 2007 - 13:16:02 EDT
So why persuade those who prefer to invest time to distribute "inferior" Community version? If they have time and expertise they're going to just hate your sales/marketing/management -- whoever gets mentioned as coming up with technically dumb ideas -- but not recommend paying company which took this vector. For clients, adding matters, not subtracting. > >- To state the obvious first, they fact that they don't pay "Maybe" is weak business case IMO. > >How about making paying customers get binaries and not There are different communities of community users probably. This might be not 100% solution but that's not "non-scalable". > We have Windows and OS X users to also worry about Maybe it's their part to worry about paying MySQL AB just as well as they're paying Microsoft and Apple if there's no-one else to prepare competent builds for them? There will always be people who would just cash out to any problem, whether it's solvable by cash or not, and people who would rather rely on themselves if at all possible. Trying to put them in one boat -- _that_ seems like no scalable solution to me. > And as a company selling support, we cannot tell people to take But they will. And distributors will often work as the first line support for no money. > 24/7 support, with an answer guaranteed in under 30 minutes - I don't need that, for example. And if I do, I would prefer sticking with distro binaries as long as possible (even if that means bugging or helping maintainer(s) to bring the build closer to what MySQL would consider OK). > >And with Kaj's blog post talking about making community So why should distro packagers *not* use and provide them? > Incidentally, MySQL has plans to have distribution This usually fails miserably: vendors just **** hard at providing distribution support. Much worse than distros at supporting whatever is getting packaged, usually. Would be much better to work with distro maintainers and not spend extra money (were you willing to increase income or spendings anyways?) for duplicating what they do for themselves. Our distribution glibc folks have helped with pulling some MySQL-related changes upstream several years ago IIRC (maybe Egor Egorov would remember, or I have that archived); MySQL AB probably isn't going to build packages for ALT Linux, and if they would, the result would have to comply with our quality policies which are rather strict in quite a few parts where e.g. RHEL would happily pass it. sanja@mysql could probably elaborate on that. We also were talking through considering certification of MySQL on ALT Linux as "proper build" but first the glibc issues were being solved (which were mostly attributed to broken MySQL threading design, and I think rightfully so), then everyone had enough business by themselves -- we just didn't return to this with Egor. It was back in 2002 or 2003 IIRC. --- You should have learned from other companies who were 100% proprietary but had to deal with Linux/FLOSS; and your sales seem to do much harm for not having done their homework on basic marketing. No time to hate, especially those who could recommend buying your support -- a year ago with lighter heart than today. -- ---- WBR, Michael ShigorinReceived on Tue Sep 18 13:16:12 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 07 2007 - 10:15:39 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||