Re: Distro packaging decisions and the non-public Enterprise source

Jeremy Cole wrote:

Hi!

>> Yes, this has been brought up, and everything you've mentioned before 
>> has also been brought up. Our canned answer for this is that the 
>> internal server QA processes have improved tremendously, and there are 
>> many many test cases and an impressive test suite, hence MySQL has 
>> decided to try a "reverse Enterprise" model

As Joerg has mentioned before, not everyone agrees with this, and while I personally believe community QA is necessary, it seems that at the moment, the Enterprise team things otherwise

So no, I haven't written off community QA

</standard disclaimers apply, these are my opinions only>

-- 
Colin Charles, Community Relations Manager, APAC
MySQL AB, Melbourne, Australia, www.mysql.com
Mobile: +614 12 593 292 / Ekiga/Skype/Gizmo: colincharles
Web: 
http://www.bytebot.net/blog/

MySQL Forge: 
http://forge.mysql.com/

-- 
MySQL Packagers Mailing List
For list archives: 
http://lists.mysql.com/packagers
To unsubscribe:    
http://lists.mysql.com/packagers?unsub=lists@pantek.com