|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Distro packaging decisions and the non-public Enterprise source
From: Joerg Bruehe <joerg(at)mysql.com>
Date: Thu Sep 20 2007 - 05:04:16 EDT
Jeremy Cole wrote:
No, I cannot argue that, and I never tried to. But IMO there is no significant difference between giving a version with such an issue to any user, be s/he paying or not - it should not meet the paying customer, but equally it should not meet the non-paying community user. > If "you" means me personally, I will ignore that: I never said this is my personal preference. If "you" refers to MySQL AB, this is a way to put it which I cannot claim to be completely wrong, even though I am sure this is not the intention of the current scheme of operation.
A salesperson must always work by the assumption the product is
operating correct, and from that point it is ok to give paying users a
headstart with a new version.
(I belong to the technical side, but try to understand the other point of view; so I may present arguments even though I do not share them.)
Regards,
-- Joerg Bruehe, Senior Production Engineer MySQL AB, www.mysql.com Office: (+49 30) 417 01 487 VoIP: 4464@sip.mysql.com -- MySQL Packagers Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/packagers To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/packagers?unsub=lists@pantek.comReceived on Thu Sep 20 05:05:39 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 07 2007 - 10:15:40 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||