Re: Eyeballs needed on new reference counted pointer template

Better yet, why not just use boost's TR1 implementation?

http://www.boost.org/doc/html/boost_tr1.html

That way when the rest of the compilers come out with their TR1 implementations you aren't necessarily tied to boost.

Although, I think you should use boost to its fully extent, esp. the header only libraries.

Thanks,
Graham

On Aug 15, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Robert Mecklenburg wrote:

> Warren Young writes:
>> Smart pointers are tricky, and automatic memory management is even
>> trickier, and I just created a template that does both.
>
> Joel Fielder writes:
>> I'd like to see use of Boost.
>
> It's also worth mentioning that the shared_ptr classes have been
> accepted for C++ Technical Report 1 and will be included in all future
> C++ compiler suites. It is already in gcc 4.1.2.
>
> If you don't want to "rely" on boost (or the vendor compiler), you
> could probably just include the header in the mysql++ distro tarball.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Robert
>
> --
> MySQL++ Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus
> To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus?
> unsub=grahamreitz@mac.com
>

-- 
MySQL++ Mailing List
For list archives: 
http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus
To unsubscribe:    
http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus?unsub=lists@pantek.com