Re: SSQLSv2 design discussion

Joel Fielder wrote:
>
> Also, the ability to apply some transform as the result set goes into
> the SSQLS, e.g. localising a date.

I have zero personal interest in that. If one wants it, one will have to provide a patch.

Fortunately, I think SSQLSv2 should be unusually resistant to ABI breakage. Most changes to it should just change the generated code. This might break someone else's ABI, but that's their concern. :)

This means SSQLSv2 should be free to evolve in interesting ways after it's released. We don't have to boil the ocean today.

-- 
MySQL++ Mailing List
For list archives: 
http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus
To unsubscribe:    
http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus?unsub=lists@pantek.com