RE: Sample files -- BadQuery w/Errnum patch part 4

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warren Young [mailto:mysqlpp@etr-usa.com]
>
> I think we don't want the example to succeed. It's
> intentionally demonstrating a programming bug, so it should fail.

Point taken.

> If we get rid of the loop and maybe add another pause point,
> is the only difference the order of lock acquisition? If so,
> you could just add an option to examples/cmdline.cpp to
> switch between the modes. It could be just a generic "mode
> switch" (-m?) taking an integer that means something only to
> some programs. To examples/deadlock, -m1 says to acquire
> lock1 first, and -m2 lock2. All other programs can ignore it
> for now. The value can go in a global variable, like dtest_mode.

That'll work. Want me to update the samples and resend them?

-- 
MySQL++ Mailing List
For list archives: 
http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus
To unsubscribe:    
http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus?unsub=lists@pantek.com