Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Nils Kassube wrote: > > >> Donald D Henson wrote: >> >>> 1. Does i686 always mean that the referenced processor/machine/platform >>> is 64-bit? >>> >> No, it is 32 bit. The CPUs which are referred to by "i686" are usually 32 >> bit CPUs. See <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I686>. >> >> >>> 2. Does i386 always mean 32-bit? >>> >> Yes. >> >> >>> 3. If the 'uname' command reports that the machine/processor is i686 >>> and that the platform is i386, does this mean that I am restricted to >>> 32-bit software? >>> >> Yes and no. If your CPU understands 64 bit instructions, they should work, >> but what you get as 64 bit software probably needs the libraries compiled >> for 64 bit Linux. If you want to have 64 bit Ubuntu, you need the AMD64 >> version. >> > > One way to check your processor's 32 vs 64-bit capability: > > - Try to boot or install a 64-bit version of an OS. If the OS sees a > 32-bit processor, it will complain and instruct you to install the 32-bit > version. > > Scott >
Kind of the sink or swim technique, eh? Actually, that's my strategy.
But as I was working on my upgrade plan, I realized that I have no idea
which processors are 32-bit and which are 64-bit. After the upgrade, I
guess I'll know. Thanks, everybody.
Don Henson
> >> Nils >> >> -- >> ubuntu-users mailing list >> ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users >> >> > >
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
Received on Tue Jul 31 16:04:38 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Mon Oct 15 2007 - 19:22:19 EDT
|