[Hipsec-rg] feedback on draft-oliva-hiprg-reap4hip-00

Editorial comments as scanned pages (sorry guys for the format):

http://www.iki.fi/miika/temp/draft-oliva-reap4hip-00/

Non-editorial comments:

• We should think about merging with the nat draft when the approach has been finally decided: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hip-nat-traversal-02.txt
• I disagree on the probe message format. The probe should at least be a normal HIP parameter. Better yet, I would suggest splitting the huge probe blob into multiple small parameters (real parameters or subparameters). These will make handling the probe easier in existing HIP code.

-- 
Miika Komu                                       
http://www.iki.fi/miika/
_______________________________________________
Hipsec-rg mailing list
Hipsec-rg@listserv.cybertrust.com
https://listserv.cybertrust.com/mailman/listinfo/hipsec-rg